This paper outlines the reported discrepancies between the aims of the welfare services in Iceland and the experiences of parents raising young children with intellectual disabilities. Prevailing views on disability and service delivery were also considered. A multi case study design was employed to reflect the situation in different parts of the country. Families of eight children with intellectual disabilities and professionals in three different municipalities formed the cases. The findings reveal a high convergence between the three cases with variations based on individual experiences rather than geographical location. Overall, parents praised the preschools but experienced support services often as fragmented and uncompromising. Particular components of the services were consistently regarded as hard to reach and not in accordance with the needs of the family. Cultural-historical activity theory is introduced as a beneficial framework for further study and system improvement.
ArnadottirUEgilsonST (2012) Evaluation of therapy services with the measure of processes of care (MPOC-20): the perspectives of Icelandic parents of children with physical disability. Journal of Child Health Care16(1): 62–74. DOI: 10.1177/1367493511423769.
2.
BaileyDBRaspaMFoxLC (2011) What is the future of family outcomes and family-centered services?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education31(4): 216–223. DOI: 10.1177/0271121411427077.
3.
BammELRosenbaumP (2008) Family-centered theory: origins, development, barriers, and supports to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation89(8): 1618–1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr. 12.034.
4.
BarnesC (2012) The social model of disability: valuable or irrelevant? In: WatsonNRoulstoneA and ThomasC (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 12–29.
5.
BarnesCMercerGShakespeareT (1999) Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Malden: Polity Press.
6.
BjarnasonDS (2009) Parents and professionals: an uneasy partnership? In: AllanJOzgaJSmythG (eds) Social Capital, Professionalism and Diversity. Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 123–139.
7.
BjarnasonDS (2010) Social Policy and Social Capital: Parents and Exceptionality, 1974–2007. New York: Nova Science.
8.
BjörnsdóttirKStefánsdóttirGVStefánsdóttirA (2015) ‘It’s my life’ Autonomy and people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities19(1): 5–21.
9.
BlacklerF (2009) Cultural-historical activity theory and organisational studies. In: SanninoADanielsH andGutierrezKD (eds) Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–40.
10.
BruderMBDunstCJ (2014) Parental judgments of early childhood intervention personnel practices: applying a consumer science perspective. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education34(4): 200–210. DOI: 10.1177/0271121414522527.
11.
CarullaLSReedGMVaez-AziziLM (2011) Intellectual developmental disorders: towards a new name, definition and framework for mental retardation/intellectual disability in ICD-11. World Psychiatry10(3): 175–180.
12.
CaseS (2010) Learning to partner, disabling conflict: early indications of an improving relationship between parents and professionals with regard to service provision for children with learning disabilities. Disability and Society16(6): 837–854. DOI: 10.1080/09687590120083985.
13.
CreswellJW (2008) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
14.
De ChenuLDæhlenDTahJ (2016) A critical comparison of welfare states and their relevance to people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities20(4): 397–415. DOI: 10.1177/1744629515624613.
15.
DempseyIKeenD (2008) A review of processes and outcomes in family-centered services for children with a disability. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education28(1): 42–52. DOI: 10.1177/0271121408316699.
16.
DunstCJ (2002) Family-centered practices: birth through high school. The Journal of Special Education36(3): 141–149. DOI: 10.1177/00224669020360030401.
17.
DunstCJTrivetteCM (1987) Enabling and empowering families: conceptual and intervention issues. School Psychology Review16(4): 443–456.
18.
EgilsonST (2011) Parent perspectives of therapy services for their children with physical disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences25(2): 277–284. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00823.x.
19.
EgilsonST (2015) User perspectives on support services to disabled children and their families. In: TraustadóttirRYtterhusBEgilsonST, et al. (eds) Childhood and Disability in the Nordic Countries: Being, Becoming, Belonging. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 231–247.
20.
EgilsonSTStefánsdóttirS (2014) Velferðarþjónusta og fötluð börn: Reynsla foreldra af starfi fjölskyldudeildar Akureyrarbæjar[Welfare services and disabled children: Perspectives from parents in the municipality of Akureyri]. Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla [Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration]10(2): 589–612.
21.
EmersonE (2003) Mothers of children and adolescents with intellectual disability: social and economic situation, mental health status, and the self-assessed social and psychological impact of the child’s difficulties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research47: 385–399.
22.
EngeströmY (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
23.
EngeströmY (2001) Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work14(1): 133–156. DOI: 10.1080/13639080123238.
24.
EngeströmY (2008) From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Espe-SherwindtM (2008) Family-centred practice: collaboration, competency and evidence. Support for Learning23(3): 136–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00384.x.
26.
FergusonPM (2001) Mapping the family. Disability studies and the exploration of parental responses to disability. In: AlbrechtGLSeelmanKDBuryM (eds) Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 373–396.
27.
GoodleyD (2001) ‘Learning difficulties’, the social model of disability and impairment: challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society16(2): 207–231.
28.
GuralnickMJ (2005) An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In: GuralnickMJ (ed) The Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, pp. 1–23.
29.
GustavssonATøssebroJTraustadóttirR (2005) Introduction: approaches and perspectives in nordic disability research. In: GustavssonATøssebroJTraustadóttirR et al. (eds) Resistance, Reflection and Change: Nordic Disability Research. Lund: Studentlitteratur, pp. 23–45.
Kruijsen-TerpstraAJVerschurenOKetelaarM. (2016) Parents’ experiences and needs regarding physical and occupational therapy for their young children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities53–54: 314–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.02.012.
32.
LundebyHTøssebroJ (2008) Exploring the experiences of “not being listened to” from the perspective of parents with disabled children. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research10(4): 258–274. DOI: 10.1080/15017410802469700.
33.
McLauchlinJGoodleyDClaveringE. (2008) Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (2008) The Preschool Act, No. 90/2008. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture Regulation on Expert Advisory Service for Municipalities’ Preschools and Compulsory Schools and Pupil Welfare Committees in Compulsory Schools, No. 584/2010. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
35.
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (2012) The Icelandic National Curriculum Guide for Preschools. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
36.
Ministry of Welfare (2003) Lög um Greiningar- og ráðgjafarstöð ríkisins [Law on the State Diagnostic- and Counselling Centre] No. 80/2003.
NachshenJS (2015) Empowerment and families: building bridges between parents and professionals, theory and research. Journal on Developmental Disabilites11(1): 67–76.
39.
NummijokiJEngeströmY (2010) Towards co-configuration in home care of elderly: cultivating agency by designing and implementing the mobility agreement. In: DanielsHEdwardsAEngeströmY et al. (eds) Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting Learning Across Boundaries and Agencies. London: Routledge, pp. 49–72.
40.
OliverM (1990) The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan Education.
41.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
42.
RosenbaumPKingSLawM. (1998) Family-centred service: a conceptual framework and research review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Paediatrics18(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/j006v18n01_01.
43.
SchalockRLSharonABorthwick-DuffyS (2010) Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 11th ed. Washington: American Association on Intellectualand Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD).
44.
ShakespeareT (2014) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
45.
SimonsH (2009) Case Study Research in Practice, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
StefánsdóttirSEgilsonST (2016) Diverging on Children’s rehabilitation services: a mixed-methods study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy23(5): 374–382. DOI 10.3109/11038128.2015.1105292
48.
TøssebroJ (2004) Introduction to the special issue: understanding disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research6(1): 3–7. DOI: 10.1080/15017410409512635.
49.
TøssebroJ (2015) Disabled children and welfare policy in the Nordic countries. In: TraustadóttirRYtterhusBEgilsonST (eds) Childhood and Disability in the Nordic Countries: Being, Becoming, Belonging. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–50.
50.
TøssebroJWendelborgC (2015) Ordinary or not? Families of children growing up with disabilities. In: TraustadóttirRYtterhusBEgilsonST et al. (eds) Childhood and Disability in the Nordic Countries: Being, Becoming, Belonging. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 199–214.
51.
TraustadóttirR (2009) Disability studies, the social model and legal developments. In: ArnardottirOMQuinnG (eds) The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 3–16.
YtterhusBEgilsonSTTraustadóttirR. (2015) Perspectives on childhood and disability. In: TraustadóttirRYtterhusB andEgilsonST (eds) Childhood and Disability in the Nordic Countries: Being, Becoming, Belonging. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–33.
54.
YtterhusBWendelborgCLundebyH (2008) Managing turning points and transitions in childhood and parenthood – insights from families with disabled children in Norway. Disability and Society23(6): 625–636. DOI: 10.1080/09687590802328535.
