This article focuses on the situation of persons with intellectual disabilities in the developing post-Soviet countries and aims to review the extent to which services offered to them promote values of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and empower these persons to lead fulfilling lives. Interviews with experts revealed that post-Soviet countries form a peculiar cluster among other developing countries, which has specific attributes. First of all, there prevails a strong stigmatization, which consequently leads to the predominant silent mandate to isolate those with intellectual disabilities in big residential care institutions. Second, the governments’ lack political will to start the reforms and initiatives of nongovernmental organizations which they do not sustain (or, assumingly, are even suppressed). As a result, persons with intellectual disabilities find themselves stuck between the Soviet tradition of exclusion and simulated superficial reforms.
All-Ukrainian NGO “Coalition for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities” (2012) Shadow Report. Implementation in Ukraine of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Report for the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Kyiv: All-Ukrainian NGO “Coalition for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities”.
2.
BurchelG (2015) Community-based rehabilitation in a post-Soviet environment in Azerbaijan – where society meets ideology. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development26(3): 123–130.
3.
CrawfordBLijphartA (1997) Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Transitions. Research Series: 96, Global, Area, and International Archive.
4.
European Expert Group (2014) Toolkit on the Use of European Union Funds for the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care. EEG Report for Eurochild. Brussels: European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care.
5.
GelmanV (2003) Post-soviet transitions and democratization: towards theory building. Democratization10(2): 87–104.
6.
Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly and Vanadzor (2014) Shadow Report On the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Armenia). Report for the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Yerevan: Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly and Vanadzor.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2000) Tajikistan: Humanitarian Assistance. Situation Report no 02. Dushanbe: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
9.
LaneDMyantM (eds) (2007) Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
MakharadzeT (2010) Social integration of adults with intellectual disabilities in Georgia: lessons from Poland and the USA. International Social Work53(1): 47–59.
11.
MakharadzeTKitiashviliABricoutJC (2010) Community-based day-care services for PWID in Georgia: a step towards their social integration. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities14(4) 1–13.
12.
MeuserMNagelU (2009) The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In: BognerALittigBMenzW (eds) Interviewing Experts. Palgrave: Macmillan, pp. 17–43.
13.
MizunoyaSMitraSYamasakiI (2016) Towards Inclusive Education. The Impact of Disability on School Attendance in Developing Countries. Innocenti Working Paper. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
14.
ParmenterT (2008) The Present, Past and Future of the Study of Intellectual Disability: Challenges in Developing Countries. Salud Publica: Mex.
15.
PhillipsSD (2009) “There are no invalids in the USSR!”: A missing Soviet chapter in the new disability history. Disability Studies Quarterly29(3): 1–35.
16.
PhillipsSD (2010) Disability and Mobile Citizenship in Postsocialist Ukraine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17.
PūrasDSumskieneEAdomaityte – SubacieneI (2013) Challenges of prolonged transition from totalitarian system to liberal democracy: a case of care for persons with mental disabilities. Social Policy and Social Work in Transition1: 31–54.
18.
RubinBRSnyderJL (eds) (1998) Post-Soviet Political Order: Conflict and State Building. London: Psychology Press.
19.
SammonE (2001) Children and Disability in the Context of Family Breakdown in Central and South Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Every Child.
20.
SidaniusJPrattoF (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
SumskieneE (2013) Giving a voice to individuals with psychosocial disabilities: services of patients’ trust person in lithuanian psychiatric hospitals. Revista de Asistenţă Socială12(4): 73–84.
22.
SumskieneEOrlovaL (2015) Forbidden sexuality of women with intellectual disabilities residing in closed residential care institutions in post-soviet countries. Sexuality and Culture19(2): 369–387.
23.
TakalaTPiattoevaN (2012) Changing conceptions of development assistance to education in the international discourse on post-Soviet countries. International Journal of Educational Development32(1): 3–10.
24.
The UN Partnership on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, WHO, UNICEF, UNDP, MDAC (2015) The Human Rights of People with Mental or Intellectual Impairments in the Republic of Moldova. UNPRPD Fund: Chisinau.
25.
TobisD (2000) Moving From Residential Institutions to Community-Based Social Services in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington: World Bank.
26.
UNICEF (2008) Поощрение прав детей с ограниченными возможностями [Promoting the Rights of Children with Disabilities]. Report for Digest Innocenti: 13. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
27.
United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations.
28.
WhitakerS (2013) Intellectual Disability. An Inability to Cope with an Intellectually Demanding World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
