Perspectives of family members of people with an intellectual disability to a major reconfiguration of living arrangements for people with intellectual disability in Ireland
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2016
Perspectives of family members of people with an intellectual disability to a major reconfiguration of living arrangements for people with intellectual disability in Ireland
To document the views of family members of people with an intellectual disability regarding implementation of a personalized model of social support in Ireland.
Method:
Forty family members participated in six focus groups. Data were thematically analysed.
Results:
Family members’ preference for particular types of living arrangements were highly reflective of their lived experience. Facilitators to community living included timely information on proposed moves, adequate staffing, suitable properties and locations and consideration of the characteristics of individuals who share a property. Barriers included high support needs, advanced age, a fear of relinquishing current supports, a fear of the sustainability of newer models of residential support and concerns about community opposition.
Conclusion:
The family perspective to reform is characterized by fear and suspicion of the motivation behind these reforms, with cost efficiencies being perceived as a main driver. Greater information is required to empower families to make informed decisions.
BigbyCClementTMansellJ. (2009) It’s pretty hard with our ones, they can’t talk, the more able bodied can participate; staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research53(4): 363–376.
2.
ChadwickDMannanHGarciaEI. (2013) Family voices: life for family caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities26: 119–132.
3.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
4.
CreswellJ (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications: Sage Publication with multiple locations, propose London.
5.
Department of Health (2012) Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland. Dublin: Department of Health.
6.
DillenburgerKMcKerrL. (2011) ‘How long are we able to go on?’ Issues faced by older family caregivers of adults with disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities39(1): 29–38.
7.
DoodyO (2011) Families’ views on their relatives with intellectual disability moving from a long-stay psychiatric institution to a community-based intellectual disability service: an Irish context. British Journal of Learning Disabilities40: 46–54.
FreedmanR. I.BoyerN. C. (2000) The power to choose: Supports for families caring for individuals with developmental disabilities. Health & Social Work25(1): 59–68.
10.
Health Service Executive (HSE) (2011) Time to Move on from Congregated Settings: A Strategy for Community Inclusion. Report of the Working Group on Congregated Settings. Dublin: Health Service Executive.
KellyFKellyCO’DonohoeA (2013) Annual Report of the National Intellectual Disability Database Committee 2012. Dublin: Health Research Board.
13.
KitzingerJ (1995) Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal311(7000): 299.
14.
LinehanCO’DohertySTatlow-GoldenM. (2015) Moving Ahead: Factors Contributing to Successful Transition of People with Intellectual Disabilities from Congregated to Community-based Residential Options in Two Regions in Ireland. Dublin: School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin.
15.
MansellJBeadle-BrownJ (2009) Dispersed or clustered housing for adults with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability34(4): 313–323.
16.
MansellJEricssonK (1996) Deinstitutionalisation and Community Living: Intellectual Disability Services in Scandinavia, Britain and the US. London: Chapman & Hall.
17.
MansellJKnappMBeadle-BrownJ. (2007) Deinstitutionalisation and Community Living – outcomes and Costs: Report of a European Study. Vol. 2: Main Report. Canterbury: Tizard Centre, University of Kent.
18.
McConkeyRBuntingBFerryF. (2013) An Evaluation of Personalised Supports to Individuals with Disabilities and Mental Health Difficulties. Dublin: University of Ulster & Genio.
19.
McConkeyRKellyFCraigS. (2013) A longitudinal study of the intra-country variations in the provision of residential care for adult persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research57(10): 969–979.
20.
McConkeyRMcConaghieJBarrO. (2006) Views of family carers to the future accommodation and support needs of their relatives with intellectual disabilities. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine23(4): 140–144.
21.
McConkeyRMcConaghieJMezzaF. (2003) Moving from long-stay hospitals: the views of Northern Irish patients and relatives. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities7(1): 78–93.
22.
NieboerAPijpersVStratingMMH (2011) Implementing community care for people with intellectual disability: the role of organizational characteristics and the innovation’s attributes. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities24: 370–380.
23.
ParishSL (2005) Deinstitutionalization in two states: the impact of advocacy, policy, and other social forces on services for people with developmental disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities30(4): 1–13.
24.
PowerAKennyK (2011) When care is left to roam: carers’ experiences of grassroots nonprofit services in Ireland. Health & Place17: 422–429.
25.
RyanA (1999) Walls of Silence: Ireland’s Policy Towards People with a Mental Disability. Kilkenny: Red Lion Press.
26.
Tatlow-GoldenMLinehanCO’DohertyS. (2014) Living Arrangement Options for People with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
27.
TossebroJLundebyH (2006) Family attitudes to deinstitutionalisation: changes during and after reform years in a Scandinavian country. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability31(2): 115–119.
28.
WernerSEdwardsMBaumN (2009) Family quality of life before and after out-of-home placement of a family member with an intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities6(1): 32–39.
29.
WieselIBigbyC (2015) Movement on shifting sands: deinstitutionalisation and people with intellectual disability in Australia, 1974–2014. Urban Policy and Research33(2): 1–17.
30.
YinRK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
31.
YoungL (2006) Community and cluster centre residential services for adults with intellectual disability: long-term results from an Australian-matched sample. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research15(6): 419–431.
