A review of research on direct-care staff data collection regarding the severity and function of challenging behavior in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2016
A review of research on direct-care staff data collection regarding the severity and function of challenging behavior in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities
In working with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs), it is direct care staff who are often required to collect data on individuals’ behavior which is used as the basis for implementation of empirically based approaches for intervention and treatment. Due to limited resources, indirect and descriptive measures of challenging behaviors are employed to analyze the function of individuals’ behaviors in place of the preferred method of multimodal assessment, which includes experimental functional analysis. To ensure the most effective services and support to individuals with IDDs, accurate and consistent data collection is critical. In this article, we highlight the importance of accurate data collection practices, conduct a comparison of data collection methods, and discuss limitations .… and barriers for staff. The article concludes with recommendations for best practices and future research.
AitkenCJSchlossJA (1994) Occupational stress and burnout amongst staff working with people with an intellectual disability. Behavioral Interventions9: 225–234.
2.
AlterPJConroyMAMancilG. (2008) A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: descriptive methods and functional analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education17(2): 200–219.
3.
AmanMGBurrowWHWolfordPL (1995) The aberrant behavior checklist—community: factor validity and effect of subject variables for adults in group homes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency100: 283–292.
4.
BeaversGAIwataBALermanDC (2013) Thirty years of research on functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis46: 1–21.
5.
CataniaCAlmeidaDLiu-ConstantB. (2009) Video modeling to train staff to implement discrete-trial instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis42(2): 387–392.
6.
CollinsSHigbeeTSalzbergC. (2009) The effects of video modeling on staff implementation of a problem-solving intervention with adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis42(4): 849–854.
7.
DunlapGFoxL (2011) Function-based interventions for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Early Intervention33(4): 333–343.
8.
DevineSLRappJTTestaJR. (2011) Detecting changes in simulated events using partial-interval recording and momentary time sampling III: evaluating sensitivity as a function of session length. Behavioral Interventions26: 103–124.
9.
FahrenholzAR (2004) Multiple-respondent anecdotal assessments for behavior disorders: an analysis of interrater agreement and correspondence with functional analysis outcomes, Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, USA.
10.
FiskeKDelmolinoL (2012) Use of discontinuous methods of data collection in behavioral intervention: guidelines for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice5(2): 77–81.
11.
GreeneBWillisBLevyR. (1978) Measuring client gains from staff-implemented programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis11: 395–412.
12.
GrodenGLantzS (2001) The reliability of the detailed behavior report (DBR) in documenting functional assessment observations. Behavioral Interventions16: 15–25.
13.
HallSS (2005) Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal26(6): 514–526.
14.
HanleyGP (2012) Functional assessment of problem behavior: dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice5(1): 54–72.
15.
HanleyGIwataBMcCordB (2003) Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis36(2): 147–185.
16.
HastingsRPHorneSMitchellG (2004) Burnout in direct care staff in intellectual services: a factor analytic study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research48(3): 268–273.
17.
HealyOBrettDLeaderG (2013) A comparison of experimental functional analysis and the questions about behavioral function (QABF) in the assessment of challenging behavior of individuals with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders7(1): 66–81.
18.
HerzingerCCampbellJ (2006) Comparing functional assessment methodologies: a quantitative synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37: 1430–1445.
19.
InghamBRileyJNevinH. (2013) An initial evaluation of direct care staff resilience workshops in intellectual disabilities services. Journal of Intellectual Dissabilities17(3): 214–222.
20.
IwataBADorseyMFSliferKE. (1982) Towards a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities2: 3–20.
21.
KearneyAJ (2008) Understanding Applied Behavior Analysis: An Introduction to ABA for Parents, Teachers, and other Professionals. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
22.
KurtzPFodstadJHueteJ. (2013) Caregiver- and staff-conducted functional analysis outcomes: a summary of 52 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis46(4): 738–749.
23.
LambertJBloomSClayC. (2014) Training residential staff and supervisors to conduct traditional functional analyses. Research in Developmental Disabilities35: 1757–1765.
24.
MortensonBPRushKSWebsterJ. (2008) Early career teachers accuracy in predicting behavior functioning: a pilot study of teacher skills. International Journal of Behavior Consultation and Therapy4(4): 311–318.
25.
McCahillJHealyOLydonS (2014) Training educational staff in functional behavior assessment: a systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities26(4): 479–505.
26.
MillerJATansyMHughesTL (1998) Functional behavioral assessment: the link between problem behavior and effective intervention in schools. Current Issues in Education1(5): 1–18.
27.
MooreJWEdwardsRPSterling-TurnerHE. (2002) Teacher acquisition of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis35: 73–77.
28.
MooreJFisherWIwataB (2007) The effects of videotape modeling on staff acquisition of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis40(1): 197–202.
29.
MozingoDBSmithTRiordanMRReissMLBaileyJS (2006) Enhancing frequency recording by developmental disabilities treatment staff. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis39(2): 253–256.
30.
NathanWA (1992) Integrated multimodal therapy of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic56: 283–312.
31.
NewcomerLLLewisTJ (2004) Functional behavior assessment: an investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders13: 168–181.
32.
NockMK (2009) Why do people hurt themselves? New insights into the nature and functions of self-injury. Current Directions In Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell)18(2): 78–83.
33.
OliverMNISkillmanGD (2012) Optimizing direct-care paraprofessionals’ adherence to behavioral support programs. NADD Bulletin5(1): 3–6.
34.
O’NeillREHornerRHAlbinRW. (1997) Functional Assessment and Program Development for Problem Behavior. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
35.
PaclawskyjTRMatsonJLRushKS. (2000) Questions about behavioral function (QABF): a behavioral checklist for functional assessment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities21: 223–229.
36.
RappJTColby-DirksenAMMichalskiDN. (2008) Detecting changes in simulated events using partial-interval recording and momentary time sampling. Behavioral Interventions23: 237–269.
37.
RappaportNMinahanJ (2012) Cracking the behavior code. Educational Leadership70(2): 18–25.
38.
ReisMHWineBBrutzmanB (2013) Enhancing the accuracy of low-frequency behavior data collection by direct-care staff. Behavioral Interventions28: 344–352.
39.
RoscoeEFisherWDeleonI (2008) Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis41: 249–254.
40.
SandallSSchwartzILacroixB (2004) Interventionists’ perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention26: 161–174.
41.
TarboxJWilkeAENajdowskiAC. (2009) Comparing indirect, descriptive, and experimental functional assessments of challenging behavior in children with autism. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities21(6): 493–514.
42.
ValdovinosMGNapolitanoDAZarconeJR. (2002) Multimodal evaluation of risperidone for destructive behavior: functional analysis, direct observations, rating scales, and psychiatric impressions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology10(
3): 268–275.
43.
Virgues-OrtegaJSegui-DuranDDescalzo-QueroA. (2010) Caregivers’ agreement and validity of indirect functional analysis: a cross cultural evaluation across multiple problem behavior topographies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders41(1): 82–91.
44.
WackerDPLeeJFDalmauYC. (2013) Conducting functional analyses of problem behavior via telehealth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis46: 31–46.
45.
WightmanJJulioFVirgués-OrtegaJ (2013) Advances in the indirect, descriptive, and experimental approaches to the functional analysis of problem behavior. Psicotherma26(2): 186–192.
