HAM models have proven their value for analyzing moisture-related pathologies by assessing hygrothermal responses to environmental exposure. In this study, a coupling between CFD and HAM is developed to capture spatial wetting and drying effects, which allows to identify façade degradation patterns. Wind-driven rain (WDR) and evaporation significantly influence the hygrothermal performance and durability of façades, particularly in heritage and renovation. In traditional HAM modeling, WDR and convective heat transfer coefficients (CHTC) are often simplified by applying generic, uniform values across the façade. However, this approximation fails to account for the spatial and temporal variations in WDR and neglects the significant variations in CHTC due to the surrounding velocity flow field. These oversimplifications can limit the validity and accuracy of hygrothermal predictions. This study presents a novel approach by externally coupling CFD simulations with HAM modeling to capture the spatial distribution of WDR and CHTC on building façades. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and Eulerian-multiphase simulations are performed to calculate the wind flow and the rain trajectories with turbulent dispersion of raindrops. Using a cubic low-rise building as a case, the coupled model evaluates the effects of wind and rain exposure on façade deterioration, including frost degradation, salt crystallization, and algae growth. Results indicate that conventional approaches tend to underestimate critical rain loads, while drying potential is overestimated. It highlights how spatial variations in WDR and drying influence degradation mechanisms, emphasizing the need for more detailed spatial analyses. This integrated method provides valuable insights into risks posed by moisture exposure and drying dynamics, offering practical applications for targeted renovation strategies and improved preservation of building materials.
ASHRAE Task Group (1975) Procedure for Determining Heating and Cooling Loads for Computerising Energy Calculations. Algorithms for Building Heat Transfer Subroutines. ASHRAE.
2.
BalkstenKStrandberg-de BruijnP (2021) Understanding deterioration due to salt and ice crystallization in Scandinavian Massive Brick Masonry. Heritage4(1): 349–370.
BestAC (1950) The size distribution of raindrops. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society76: 16–36.
5.
BlockenBCarmelietJ (2002) Spatial and temporal distribution of driving rain on a low-rise building. Wind and Structures5(5): 441–462.
6.
BlockenBCarmelietJ (2004) A review of wind-driven rain research in building science. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics92(13): 1079–1130.
7.
BlockenBCarmelietJ (2007) Validation of CFD simulations of wind-driven rain on a low-rise building facade. Building and Environment42: 2530–2548.
8.
BlockenBCarmelietJ (2010) Overview of three state-of-the-art wind-driven rain assessment models and comparison based on model theory. Building and Environment45(3): 691–703.
9.
BlockenBDefraeyeTDeromeD, et al. (2009) High-resolution CFD simulations for forced convective heat transfer coefficients at the facade of a low-rise building. Building and Environment44: 2396–2412.
10.
BlockenBDezsöGvan BeeckJ, et al. (2010) Comparison of calculation models for wind-driven rain deposition on building facades. Atmospheric Environment44: 1714–1725.
11.
ChenXTermoniaPHamdiR, et al. (2025) Modeling algae growth on masonry in hygrothermal simulations: developing a new response indicator. Building and Environment269: 112437.
12.
ChoiECC (1991) Numerical simulation of wind-driven rain falling onto a 2-D building. In: Asia Pacific conference on computational mechanics, Hong Kong.
13.
ChoiECC (1993) Simulation of wind-driven-rain around a building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics46–47: 721–729.
14.
ChoiECC (1994) Determination of wind-driven-rain intensity on building faces. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics51(1): 55–69.
15.
ChoiECC (2002) Modelling of wind-driven rain and its soil detachment effect on hill slopes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics90(9): 1081–1097.
16.
DakalTCCameotraSS (2012) Microbially induced deterioration of architectural heritages: Routes and mechanisms involved. Environmental Sciences Europe24: 36.
17.
DefraeyeTBlockenBCarmelietJ (2011) Convective heat transfer coefficients for exterior building surfaces: Existing correlations and CFD modelling. Energy Conversion and Management52: 512–522.
18.
DefraeyeTBlockenBDeromeD, et al. (2012) Convective heat and mass transfer modelling at air–porous material interfaces: overview of existing methods and relevance. Chemical Engineering Science74: 49–58.
19.
De VosJBlommaertAVan Den BosscheN (2020) Statistical analysis on Belgian building defects. In: SerratCCasasJRGibertV (eds) Current Topics and Trends on Durability of Building Materials and Components. pp.1751–1758. DOI: 10.23967/dbmc.2020.130.
20.
EN 12371:2010 (2010) Natural stone test methods - Determination of frost resistance.
21.
EN 15026 (2023) Hygrothermal performance of building components and building elements - Assessment of moisture transfer by numerical simulation.
22.
EN 15927 (2009) Hygrothermal performance of buildings - Calculation and presentation of climatic data - Part 3: Calculation of a driving rain index for vertical surfaces from hourly wind and rain data.
23.
EN 6964 (2007) Building components and building elements-Thermal resistance and thermal transmittance-Calculation method.
24.
FengCRoelsSJanssenH (2019) Towards a more representative assessment of frost damage to porous building materials. Building and Environment164: 106343.
25.
FerreiraAALDelgadoPParautaH, et al. (2023) Influence of wetting-drying cycles on wood behaviour of coastal pedestrian walkways. Recent Progress in Materials05: 1–11.
26.
FrankeJHellstenASchlünzenKH, et al. (2007) Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment-A summary. In: 11th conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes.
27.
GrossiCMBrimblecombePMenéndezB, et al. (2011) Climatology of salt transitions and implications for stone weathering. Science of the Total Environment409: 2577–2585.
28.
GunnRKinzerGD (1949) The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. Journal of Meteorology6: 243–248.
29.
HensHSL (2017) Building Physics-Heat, Air and Moisture: Fundamentals and Engineering Methods with Examples and Exercises. John Wiley & Sons.
30.
HuangSHLiQS (2010) Numerical simulations of wind-driven rain on building envelopes based on Eulerian multiphase model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics98(12): 843–857.
31.
JanssensKFengCMarincioniV, et al. (2024) Comparison of different frost models with hygrothermal simulations to better understand frost damage in porous building materials. Building and Environment255: 111399.
32.
JanssensKGodtsSOrrSA, et al. (2025) Assessing salt mixture-induced degradation in masonry facades using hygrothermal simulations. Journal of Building Physics 0(0). DOI: 10.1177/17442591251344835.
33.
KhalilzadehAGeHNgHD (2019) Effect of turbulence modeling schemes on wind-driven rain deposition on a mid-rise building: CFD modeling and validation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics184: 362–377.
34.
KubilayADeromeDBlockenB, et al. (2013) CFD simulation and validation of wind-driven rain on a building facade with an Eulerian multiphase model. Building and Environment61: 69–81.
35.
KubilayADeromeDBlockenB, et al. (2014a) High-resolution field measurements of wind-driven rain on an array of low-rise cubic buildings. Building and Environment78: 1–13.
36.
KubilayADeromeDBlockenB, et al. (2014b) Numerical simulations of wind-driven rain on an array of low-rise cubic buildings and validation by field measurements. Building and Environment81: 283–295.
37.
KubilayADeromeDBlockenB, et al. (2015a) Numerical modeling of turbulent dispersion for wind-driven rain on building facades. Environmental Fluid Mechanics15(1): 109–133.
38.
KubilayADeromeDBlockenB, et al. (2015b) Wind-driven rain on two parallel wide buildings: Field measurements and CFD simulations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics146: 11–28.
39.
LaunderBESharmaBI (1974) Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer1: 131–137.
40.
Le NoirL (2017) Materialen en technieken in historische metselwerkconstructies tussen 1830 en 1945. Master Thesis, University of Ghent, Belgium.
41.
LovedayDLTakiAH (1996) Convective heat transfer coefficients at a plane surface on a full-scale building facade. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer39(8): 1729–1742.
42.
MandinecJSasic KalagasidisAJohanssonP (2025) Predicting facade deterioration: A machine learning approach using drone imagery and microclimate data. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5113432 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5113432.
43.
MensingaPStraubePSchumacherC (2010) Assessing the freeze-thaw resistance of clay brick for interior insulation retrofit projects. In: Proceedings of the XI international conference thermal performance of the exterior envelopes of whole buildings, Clearwater, FL, USA, 5–9 December, pp.1–8.
44.
MiyauchiMHokoiSUnoT, et al. (2008) Effects of algae on monuments in hot and humid climates. Journal of Environmental Engineering73: 15.
45.
MontazeriHBlockenB (2017) New generalized expressions for forced convective heat transfer coefficients at building facades and roofs. Building and Environment119: 153–168.
46.
MontazeriHBlockenB (2018) Extension of generalized forced convective heat transfer coefficient expressions for isolated buildings taking into account oblique wind directions. Building and Environment140: 194–208.
47.
MontazeriHBlockenBDeromeD, et al. (2015) CFD analysis of forced convective heat transfer coefficients at windward building: Facades: Influence of building geometry. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics146: 102–116.
QuagliariniEGregoriniBD’OrazioM (2021) An empirical failure model to predict biofouling growth on fired bricks due to microalgae. Journal of Building Engineering44: 102965.
50.
RichardsPJHoxeyRP (1993) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ϵ turbulence model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics46–47: 145–153.
51.
SharplesS (1984) Full-scale measurements of convective energy losses from exterior building surfaces. Building and Environment19: 31–39.
52.
SteskensPWMHJanssenHRodeC (2009) Influence of the convective surface transfer coefficients on the heat, air, and moisture (HAM) building performance. Indoor and Built Environment18(3): 245–256.
53.
VandemeulebrouckeICaluwaertsSVan Den BosscheN (2022) Decision framework to select moisture reference years for hygrothermal simulations. Building and Environment218: 109080.
54.
VanderscheldenBLacasseMMooreT, et al. (2022) Methodological framework for HAM-simulations: The litigation case of a CLT-balcony subjected to rain loads during construction. In: Buildings XV conference. Presented at the buildings XV conference, Clearwater Beach, FL.
55.
VanderscheldenBVandemeulebrouckeIDe KockT, et al. (2025) SAMIRA: Balancing accuracy and cost in hygrothermal simulations. Journal of Building Physics 0(0).
56.
ZhouXKubilayADeromeD, et al. (2023) Comparison of wind-driven rain load on building facades in the urban environment and open field: A case study on two buildings in Zurich, Switzerland. Building and Environment233: 110038.
