Analyses of hygrothermal conditions in low-energy houses is important because of their likely sensitivity for excessive moisture. The presented work deals with real-time measurement of temperature and relative humidity at multiple locations inside a low-energy house envelope. The measured data allows diagnosing approaches towards building design and understanding and evaluating the house performance. Suitability and accuracy of numerical computation was analysed. The Finnish mould growth model was used to monitor risk and extent of mould growth under measured and computed conditions. The measured conditions represent more favourable environment to avoid mould growth than the design values recommended by national and international guidelines. There was no mould growth indicated at any monitored points of the envelope. Monitoring the hygrothermal conditions provides valuable information about the performance of structural elements, building material and the house envelope and it helps to predict moisture related risks during the building’s service life.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004 (2004) Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
2.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 160-2016 (2016) Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis in Buildings. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Available at: www.ashrae.org.
3.
BergerJMeurHDutykhD, et al. (2018) Analysis and improvement of the VTT mold growth model: Application to bamboo fiberboard. Building and Environment138: 262–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.031.
4.
BoudreauxPPallinSAccawiG, et al. (2018) A rule-based expert system applied to moisture durability of building envelopes. Journal of Building Physics42(3): 416–437. DOI: 10.1177/1744259117750370.
5.
BrzyskiPGrudzinskaMMajerekD (2019) Analysis of the occurrence of thermal bridges in several variants of connections of the wall and the ground floor in construction technology with the use of a hemp–lime composite. Materials12(15): 2392. DOI: 10.3390/ma12152392.
6.
DerbyMMHamehkasiMEckelsS, et al. (2017) Update of the scientific evidence for specifying lower limit relative humidity levels for comfort, health, and indoor environmental quality in occupied spaces (RP-1630). Science and Technology for the Built Environment23(1): 30–45. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080%2F23744731.2016.1206430 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2016.1206430.
7.
Directive (EU) 2018/844 (2018) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018, amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency. OJEU.
8.
Finnish Ministry of Environment (FME) (2017) Decree of the Ministry of the Environment on the Energy Performance of New Buildings. The National Building Code of Finland. Available at: https://www.ym.fi/en-US.
9.
FuHDingYLiM, et al. (2020) Research and simulation analysis of thermal performance and hygrothermal behavior of timber-framed walls with different external thermal insulation layer: Cork board and anticorrosive pine plate. Journal of Building Physics1–29. DOI: 10.1177/1744259120936720.
10.
GevingSHolmeJ (2011) Mean and diurnal indoor air humidity loads in residential buildings. Journal of Building Physics35(4): 392–421. DOI: 10.1177/1744259111423084.
11.
GlassSVGatlandSUenoK, et al. (2017) Analysis of improved criteria for mold growth in ASHRAE standard 160 by comparison with field observations. In: MukhopadhyayaPFislerD (eds.) Advances in Hygrothermal Performance of Building Envelopes: Materials, Systems and Simulations, ASTM STP1599. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1–27. DOI: 10.1520/STP159920160106.
12.
GlassSVKochkinVDrumhellerSC, et al. (2015) Moisture performance of energy-efficient and conventional wood-frame wall assemblies in a mixed-humid climate. Buildings5(3): 759–782. DOI: 10.3390/buildings5030759.
13.
GradeciKBerardiU (2019) Application of probabilistic approaches to the performance evaluation of building envelopes to withstand mould growth, Journal of Building Physics43(3): 187–207. DOI: 10.1177/1744259119861784.
14.
GradeciKBerardiUTimeB, et al. (2018) Evaluating highly insulated walls to withstand biodeterioration: A probabilistic-based methodology. Energy & Buildings177: 112–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.059.
15.
ISO 10211:2017 (2017) Thermal bridges in building construction. Heat flows and surface temperatures. Detailed calculations.
16.
ISO 6946:2017 (2017) Building components and building elements – Thermal resistance and thermal transmittance calculation methods.
17.
ISO 7730:2005 (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
18.
JensenNFBjarløvSPJohnstonCJ, et al. (2019) Hygrothermal assessment of north-facing, cold attic spaces under the eaves with varying structural roof scenarios. Journal of Building Physics44(1): 3–36. DOI: 10.1177/1744259119891753.
19.
KalameesT (2007) Air tightness and air leakages of new lightweight single-family detached houses in Estonia. Building and Environment42: 2369–2377. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv. 2006.06.001.
20.
KalameesTVinhaJKurnitskiJ (2006) Indoor humidity loads and moisture production in lightweight timber-frame detached houses. Journal of Building Physics29(3): 219–246. DOI: 10.1177/1744259106060439.
21.
MjörnellKOlssonL (2019) Moisture safety of wooden buildings – Design, construction and operation. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering24(1): 29–35 DOI: 10.5755/j01.sace.24.1.23230.
22.
OjanenTPeuhkuriRViitanenH, et al. (2011) Classification of material sensitivity – New approach for mould growth modeling. In: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic symposium on building physics, NSB 2011, Tampere, Finland, 29 May–June 2, vol. 2, pp. 867–874.
23.
Passive House Institute (PHI) (2016) Criteria for the passive house, EnerPHit and PHI low energy building standard. Available at: https://passiv.de.
24.
PiheloPKikkasHKalameesT (2016) Hygrothermal performance of highly insulated timber-frame external wall. Energy Procedia96: 685-695, In: SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference; Build Green and Renovate Deep, 5–7 October 2016, Tallinn and Helsinki.
25.
RadonJWasKFlaga-MaryanczykA, et al. (2017) Experimental and theoretical study on hygrothermal long-term performance of outer assemblies in lightweight passive house. Journal of Building Physics41(4): 299–320. DOI: 10.1177/1744259116686959.
26.
Rakennusten energiatehokkuus (2011) Määräykset ja ohjeet 2012. D3 Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
27.
RiahinezhadMEveAArmstrongM, et al. (2019) Field temperature and moisture loads from a building envelope as the basis for accelerated aging of barrier membranes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering46(11): 969–978. DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2018-0757.
28.
RIL 107-2012 (2012) Water- and Moisture Proofing Guidelines of Buildings. RIL: Finnish Association of Civil Engineers.
29.
RouchierSWoloszynMKedowideY, et al. (2016) Identification of the hygrothermal properties of a building envelope material by the Covariance Matrix Adaptation evolution strategy. Journal of Building Performance Simulation9(1): 101–114. DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2014.996608.
30.
SedlbauerK (2002) Prediction of mould growth by hygrothermal calculation. Journal of Building Physics25(4): 321–336.
31.
SinghaputtangkulNLowSP (2015) Modeling a decision support tool for buildable and sustainable building envelope designs. Buildings5(2): 521–535. DOI: 10.3390/buildings 5020521.
32.
StarakiewiczAMiasikPKrasonJ, et al. (2020) Methods for determining mold development and condensation on the surface of building barriers. Buildings10(1): 4. DOI: 10.3390/buildings10010004.
33.
StraubeJOnyskoDSchumacherC (2002) Methodology and design of field experiments for monitoring the hygrothermal performance of wood frame enclosures. Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science26(2): 123–151. DOI: 10.1177/007 5424202026002098.
34.
TarikuFKwokHSimpsonY (2016) Experimental investigation of moisture transfer between concrete foundation and sill plate. Journal of Architectural Engineering22: B4016003. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000208.
35.
ThelanderssonSIsakssonT (2013) Mould resistance design (MRD) model for evaluation of risk for microbial growth under varying climate conditions. Building and Environment65: 18–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.016.
36.
VanpachtenbekeMLangmansJVan den BulckeJ, et al. (2020) Modelling moisture conditions behind brick veneer cladding: Verification of common approaches by field measurements. Journal of Building Physics44(2): 95–120. DOI: 10.1177/1744259120 908283.
37.
ViitanenHVinhaJPeuhkuriR, et al. (2008) Development of an improved model for mould growth: Modelling. In: Proceedings of the 8th symposium on building physics in the Nordic countries, NSB 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark, 16–18 June, vol. 2, pp. 927–934.
38.
VinhaJ (2012) Hygrothermal performance of timber-framed external walls in Finnish climatic conditions: A method for determining the sufficient water vapour resistance of the interior lining of a wall assembly. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Technology, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
39.
VinhaJLaukkarinenAMäkitaloM, et al. (2013) Ilmastonmuutoksen ja lämmöneristyksen lisäyksen vaikutukset vaipparakenteiden kosteusteknisessä toiminnassa ja rakennusten energiankulutuksessa. Research report 159, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
40.
VinhaJSalminenMSalminenK, et al. (2018) Internal moisture excess of residential buildings in Finland. Journal of Building Physics42(3): 239–258. DOI: 10.1177/17442 59117750369.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
