Abstract
Every law tells a story and some of the stories we tell become the law. Conceptualizing law as literature and taking a social science approach, we examine the dynamics of a storytelling contest between the National Network to End Domestic Violence and a coalition of law enforcement professional organizations regarding the most stringent federal gun control legislation in the United States — the 1997 Lautenberg Amendment. Relying upon qualitative content analysis, we discovered that contestants drew upon the same elements of classic tragedy to compose different stories. Our analysis compares the resources and experiences available to each coalition and examines how differences between them affected the stories told. We discuss the role that dueling tragedies play in public policy controversies and evaluate the implications our case study has for understanding the competition for legislation, storytelling research and the conceptualization of law as literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.