This article re-examines the Habermas-Rawls debate. It contends that what is at issue in this dispute has largely been missed. The standard view that principle (U) and the original position form a useful point of comparison between their respective theories and that the dispute between them can be fruitfully understood on this basis is rejected. I show how this view has arisen and why it is wrong. The real issue between them lies in their respective accounts of the justification of political norms, and in their competing conceptions of legitimacy. I show how these two concepts connect. I distinguish between methodological disputes arising from the differences in approach that each takes to the questions of political legitimacy and political justification, and substantive issues about whether, and if so how moral (and ethical) reasons are germane to the justification of political norms.
BaynesK.1992. The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls and Habermas.Albany: SUNY Press.
2.
BenhabibS.1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics.London: Routledge.
3.
BeethamD.1998. ‘Legitimacy’, in CraigE. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.London: Routledge. Available at http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/S034. Accessed on 11 March 2007.
4.
CohenG. A.2000. If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
FreemanS. (ed.). 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FinlaysonJ. G.2000. ‘Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discourse Ethics’, Inquiry43(3): 319–40.
8.
FinlaysonJ. G.2005. ‘Habermas's Moral Cognitivism and the Frege-Geach Challenge’, European Journal of Philosophy13(3): 319–45.
9.
GadamerH-G. 1979. Truth and Method.London: Sheed and Ward.
10.
GutmannA.ThompsonD.1996. Democracy and Disagreement.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
HabermasJ.1992a. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.Cambridge: Polity.
12.
HabermasJ.1992b. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats.Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
13.
HabermasJ.1993. Justification and Application.Cambridge: Polity.
14.
HabermasJ.1995. ‘Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism’, The Journal of Philosophy XCII(3): 109–31.
15.
HabermasJ.1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Cambridge: Polity.
16.
HabermasJ.1998. The Inclusion of the Other.Cambridge: Polity.
17.
KantI.1992. Political Writings.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KohlbergL.1981. Essays on Moral Development vol. 1. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice.San Francisco: Harper and Row.
19.
LessingG. E.1972 [1779]. Nathan der Weise: Ein dramatisches Gedicht in fünf Aufzügen.Ditzingen: Reclam
20.
McMahonC.2002. ‘Why There is No Issue Between Habermas and Rawls’, The Journal of Philosophy XCIX (3): 111–29.
21.
MoonD. J.2003. ‘Practical Discourse and Communicative Ethics’, in WhiteS. K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–67.
22.
NagelT.1996. Equality and Partiality.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
NussbaumM.2003. ‘Rawls and Feminism’, in FreemanS. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 488–521.
SandelM.1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
ScanlonT. M.2003. ‘Rawls on Justification’, in FreemanS. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–68.
30.
SimmonsJ.1999. ‘Justification and Legitimacy’, Ethics109: 739–71.
31.
TaylorC.1993. ‘Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity, and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada’, in DalyM. (ed.), Communitarianism: A New Public Ethics.Belmont: Wadsworth.
32.
von WrightG. H.1963. Varieties of Goodness.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33.
WeberM.1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation.London: Macmillan.
34.
WeberM.2003. Political Writings.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
WhiteS. K.1988. The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
