ArblasterA.1984. The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism.New York: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
2.
AudiR.WoltersorffN.1997. Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate.Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
3.
BaderV.1999. ‘Religious Pluralism: Secularism or Priority for Democracy?’, Political Theory27(5): 597–633.
4.
BruceS.1992. ‘Introduction’, in BruceS. (ed.), Religion and Modernisation, Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularisation Thesis.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CleveJ.2005. ‘Why Coherence Is not Enough: A Defense of Moderate Foundationalism’, in SteupM.SosaE. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
6.
CohenJ.1999. ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in BohmanJ.RehgW. (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
DworkinR.1975. ‘The Original Position’, in DanielsN. (ed.), Reading Rawls, Critical Studies on Rawls' A Theory of Justice.California: Stanford University Press.
8.
EisenachE. J.1981. Two Worlds of Liberalism: Religion and Politics in Hobbes, Locke, and Mill.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
GalstonW. A.1995. ‘Two Concepts of Liberalism’, Ethics105(3): 516–34.
10.
GoodinR. E.PettitP. (eds). 1993. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
11.
GrayJ.1995. Liberalism, 2nd edn.Berkshire: Open University Press.
12.
GrayJ.1989. Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy.London: Routledge.
13.
HamptonJ.1989. ‘Should Political Philosophy be Done Without Metaphysics?’, Ethics99(4): 791–814.
14.
HolyoakeG. J.1896. English Secularism: A Confession of Belief.Chicago: Open Court.
15.
JoffeG.1997. ‘Democracy, Islam and the Culture of Modernism’, Democratization4(3): 133–51.
16.
JonesP.1995. ‘Two Conceptions of Liberalism, Two Conceptions of Justice’, British Journal of Political Science25(4): 515–50.
17.
LyonsD.1975. ‘Nature and Soundness of the Contract and Coherence Arguments’, in N. Daniels, Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls' A Theory of Justice.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18.
McLeanI. (ed.). 1996. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
McLeodH.1992. ‘Secular Cities? Berlin, London, and New York in the Later Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries’, in BruceS. (ed.), Religion and Modernisation: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularisation Thesis.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
MelandB. E.1966. The Secularisation of Modern Cultures.New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
MulhallS.SwiftA.2001. Liberals and Communitarians, 2nd edn.Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
22.
MunbyD. L.1963. The Idea of a Secular Society, and its Significance for Christians.London: Oxford University Press.
23.
NozickR.1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books Rawls, J. 1985. ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’, Philosophy and Public Affairs14(3): 223–51.
24.
RawlsJ.1987. ‘The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies7(1): 1–25.
25.
RawlsJ.1996. Political Liberalism.New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
RawlsJ.1999a. A Theory of Justice, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
RawlsJ.1999b. Collected Papers, FreemanS. (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
RawlsJ.1999c. The Law of Peoples.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
RawlsJ.2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, KellyE. (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
RortyR.1996. ‘Idealization, Foundations, and Social Practices’, in BenhabibS. (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31.
ScanlonT. M.2003. ‘Rawls and Justification’, in FreemanS. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
TawneyR.1992. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
33.
VernonR.1990. ‘J. S. Mill and the Religion of Humanity’, in CrimminsJ. E. (ed.), Religion, Secularisation and Political Thought: Thomas Hobbes to J. S. Mill.London: Routledge.