This article discusses the effects of instability on the promotion of Brazilian audio-visual production during the rule of the Bolsonaro government. The research was guided by the following question: How did independent producers and Ancine executives perceive Bolsonaro’s role in implementing the policy for audio-visual production? Responses to questionnaires were analysed using a multilevel mixed-methods approach, based on historical institutionalism and the policy dismantling model. The investigation indicated a widespread perception that government actions were detrimental to the sector, weakening Ancine and financial mechanisms via budget cuts and instability. However, Ancine’s foundations and producers’ resilience enabled them to resist these pressures.
APRO (Associação Brasileira da Produção de Obras Audiovisuais) and SEBRAE (Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas) (2016) Mapeamento e impacto econômico do setor audiovisual no Brasil. APRO and SEBRAE. Available at: https://bit.ly/30vHZPl
3.
AzevedoMLN deRobertsonSL (2021) Authoritarian populism in Brazil: Bolsonaro’s Caesarism, ‘counter-trasformismo’ and reactionary education politics. Globalisation, Societies and Education20(2): 151–162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1955663
4.
BardinL (2016) Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
5.
BauerMWGaskellG (2017) Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: Um manual prático. São Paulo: Editora Vozes.
6.
BauerMWKnillC (2014a) Understanding policy dismantling: An analytical framework. In: BauerMWJordanAGreen-PedersenCHéritierA. (eds) Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford University Press, pp. 30–56.
7.
BauerMWKnillC (2014b) A conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of policy change: measurement, explanation and strategies of policy dismantling. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice16(1): 28–44.
8.
BauerMWGreen-PedersenCHéritierA, et al. (eds) (2014) Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CaillierJG (2020) Bureaucratic bashing and praising: What effect does it have on the performance citizens assign agencies?Public Organization Review20: 685–701.
11.
CamargoBVJustoAM (2013) IRAMUTEQ: Um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas em Psicologia21(2): 513–518.
12.
FerreiraTGreenJN (2023) Introduction: Brazil under Bolsonaro. Latin American Perspectives50(1): 3–13. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X231157700.
13.
Fonseca JúniorWC (2005) Análise de conteúdo. In: DuarteJ (org) Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em comunicação. Atlas, pp. 280–315.
14.
GomideAAMichelleMSMariaAL (2023) Desmonte e reconfiguração de políticas públicas (2016-2022). IPEA; INCT/PPED.
15.
HallPATaylorCR (2003) As três versões do neo-institucionalismo. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política58: 193–223.
16.
HunterWPowerT (2019) Bolsonaro and Brazil's illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy30(1): 68–82. DOI: 10.1353/JOD.2019.0005.
17.
IkedaM (2015) Cinema brasileiro a partir da retomada. Summus.
18.
ImmergutEM (1998) The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics & Society26(1): 5–34.
19.
Jambeiro BarbosaOFde MoraisKSCanessoNS, et al. (2023) Audio-visual production in Brazil: Will its public support survive the new political scenario?Media, Culture & Society45(6): 1258–1274.
20.
KatznelsonIWeingastBR (2005) Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1153426
21.
KingGKeohaneROVerbaS (1994) Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821211
22.
LottaGSLimaIAFernandezM, et al. (2023) A resposta da burocracia ao contexto de retrocesso democrático: uma análise da atuação de servidores federais durante o Governo Bolsonaro. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política40: 1–36.
23.
MahoneyJ (2021) The Logic of Social Science. Princeton University Press.
24.
MarchJGOlsenJP (2006) Elaborating the ‘new institutionalism’. In: RhodesRAWBinderSARockmanBA. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.
25.
MilhoranceC (2022) Policy dismantling and democratic regression in Brazil under Bolsonaro: Coalition politics, ideas, and underlying discourses. Review of Policy Research39(6): 752–770. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12485.
26.
MoraisK (2016) A política de fomento ao audio-visual no Brasil e o lugar da TV. Eptic On-Line (UFS)18(1): 65–85. Política audio-visual em tempos de COVID-19: Arte e indústria em confinamento https://periodicos.ufs.br/eptic/article/view/5216
27.
MoraisK (2020) Audiovisual independente: Política de fomento e organização das produtoras no Brasil. EDUNEB.
RatinaudP (2009) IRAMUTEQ: Interface de R pour les analyses Multidimensionnelles de textes et de questionnaires. Available at: http://www.iramuteq.org
30.
ReinertM (1990) Alceste: une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique26(1): 24–54.
SteinmoSThelenKLongstrethF, et al. (eds) (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
37.
TashakkoriATeddlieC (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. Advances in Mixed Methods Research53(7): 101–119.
38.
ThelenKSteinmoS (1998) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In: SteinmoSThelenKLongstrethF. (eds) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.
