This project ethnographically explores how individuals in a small Japanese town negotiate the changes brought about by the increased omnipresence of digital technologies in their everyday lives. It delves into the affective dimensions of individuals’ imagination of a global digital order, of the impact of digital media on social organization, and of their own sense of place in a globalized world. It demonstrates that while digital media’s connective affordances help reduce the sense of isolation stemming from the community’s geographic position, conflicting feelings of disconnection, alienation and loss simultaneously arise in its members’ broader relationship to the digital world.
AbeK (2009) The myth of media interactivity: Technology, communications and surveillance in Japan. Theory Culture & Society26(2–3): 73–88.
2.
AbeK (2018) Japanese youth and SNS use: Peer surveillance and the conditions governingTomodachi. In: Darling-Wolf F (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Japanese Media. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.275–291.
3.
AckerleyCR (2015) Public event: Global to village: Grounding communication research in rural China. Journal of International Communication7(2): 4396–4422.
4.
AndrejevicMB (2010) Surveillance and alienation in the online economy. Surveillance & Society8(3): 278–287.
5.
AppaduraiA (1996) Modernity at Large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
AppaduraiA (2013) The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition. New York, NY: Verso.
7.
AuldGSnyderIHendersonM (2012) Using mobile phones as placed resources for literacy learning in a remote indigenous community in Australia. Language and Education26(4): 279–296.
8.
BaskaranAMuchieM (eds) (2007) Bridging the Digital Divide: Innovation Systems for ICT in Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and Southern Africa (ProQuest Ebook Central). Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
9.
BaymN (2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
10.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
BernierB (2011) Dispossession and changes in class relations in Japan since 1980. Critique of Anthropology31(2): 108–120.
12.
BessantJWattsR (2017) Indigenous digital art as politics in Australia. Culture Theory and Critique58(3): 306–319.
13.
BorelS (2016) Le Panoptisme Horizontal ou le Panoptisme Inversé [The Horizonal Panoptism or the Inversed Panoptism]. Tic & Société10(1): 1–21.
14.
BrennenB (2012) Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
CastellsM (2004) Informationalism, networks, and the network society: A theoretical blueprint. In: CastellsM (ed.) The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp.3–45.
17.
CastellsM (2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
CastellsM (2012) Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
19.
ChitananaT (2019) From global to local, metropolitan to village: A case for a definitional and context-oriented approach to the “digital divide”. In: RagneddaMMustvairoB (eds) Mapping the Digital Divide: A Mediated Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.45–64.
20.
CollinsJLWellmanB (2010) Small town in the internet society: Chapleau is no longer an island. American Behavioral Scientist53(9): 1344–1366.
21.
DainowB (2016) Digital alienation as the foundation of online privacy concerns. SIGCAS Computers & Society45(3): 109–117.
22.
Darling-WolfF (2015) Imagining the Global: Transnational Media and Popular Culture Beyond East and West. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Darling-WolfF (2021) In the city they go “pit pit pit”: Digital media’s affordances and imagined (dis)connections in a rural Japanese community. New Media and Society23(7): 1862–1881.
24.
EllisonNLampeCSteinfieldC, et al. (2010) With a little help from my friend: How social network sites affect social capital processes. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.124–145.
25.
EtoAHoshinoSOnitsukaK, et al. (2014) Diffusion of “Real Name” local SNS in rural communities: Approach to potential users based on segmentation. Journal of Rural Planning Association32(4): 499–506. [衛藤彬史・星野敏・鬼塚健一郎・橋本禅 (2014) 農山村地域における地域活性化を目指した実名SNS の普及, 農村計画学会誌 32(4): 499–506].
26.
EtoAHoshinoSOnitsukaK, et al. (2015) A behavioral science perspective on external support to encourage internet use. Social Informatics4(1): 31–41.[衛藤彬史・星野敏・鬼塚健一郎・橋本禅 (2015) 行動科学的観点からみたインターネット利用を促すための外的支援, 社会情報学 4(1): 31–41].
27.
EvansSKPearceKEVitakJ, et al. (2017) Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22: 35–52.
28.
FisherE (2010) Contemporary technology discourse and the legitimation of capitalism. European Journal of Communication13(2): 229–252.
29.
FuchsC (2014a) Social media and public sphere. TripleC12(1): 57–101.
30.
FuchsC (2014b) Digital Labor and Karl Marx. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
FuchsC (2014c) Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
32.
García-CancliniN (2014) Imagined Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
GergenK (2002) The challenge of absence presence. In: KatzJEAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.227–241.
35.
GibsonJJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
GranjonF (2011) Amitiés 2.0. Le Lien Social sur les Sites De Réseaux Sociaux. [Social Link on social networking sites]. Hermès, La Revue59(1): 99–104.
37.
GyabakKGodinaH (2011) Digital storytelling in Bhutan: A qualitative examination of new media tools used to bridge the digital divide in a rural community school. Computers & Education57(4): 2236–2243.
38.
JenkinsHFordSGreenJ (2013) Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Society. New York, NY: New York University Press.
39.
JohnsonTZhangWBichardS, et al. (2010) United we stand? Online social network sites and civic engagement. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.185–207.
40.
KadobayashiT (2017) The media theory and media strategy of Azuma Hiroki, 1997–2003. In: SteinbergMZahltenA (eds) Media Theory in Japan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.80–100.
41.
KimuraKBaiH (2004) Performance and steps of collective information use in agriculture: A case study of agricultural corporation M in Akehama Town, Ehime Prefecture. J-Global49: 27–36. [木村公輔・胡柏 (2004) 集団情報化による農業情報化推進の可能性と方策の考察-愛媛県明浜町のM法人を事例として, J-Global 49: 27–36].
42.
KitadaA (2017) An assault on “meaning”: On Nakai masakazus concept of “mediation”. In: SteinbergMZahltenA (eds) Media Theory in Japan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.285–304.
43.
McVeigh-SchultzJBaymNK (2015) Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, couple. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–13.
44.
Murakami WoodDLyonDAbeK (2007) Surveillance in urban Japan: A critical introduction. Urban Studies44(3): 551–568.
45.
MutsvairoBRagneddaM (2019) Mapping the Digital Divide: A Mediated Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
46.
NagyPNeffG (2015) Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–9.
47.
NegroponteN (1995) Being Digital. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
48.
OnitsukaKBaoS (2016) Current discussions and future visions of rural community development in information society. Journal of Rural Planning Association35(2): 111–116. [鬼塚健一郎包・薩日娜 (2016) 情報化社会における新たなむらづくりに関する研究動向と今後の展望, 農村計画学会誌 35(2): 111–116].
49.
OnitsukaKEtoAHoshinoS, et al. (2014) Attempt at a workshop incorporating video creation using a tablet PC. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Engineering Society83(2): 19–22.[鬼塚健一郎・衛藤彬史・星野敏・柳瀬顕 (2014) タブレットPC による映像作成を取り入れたワークショップの試み, 農業農村工学学会誌 83(2): 19–22].
50.
OnitsukaKHoshinoSHashimotoS (2013) A study on sense of region of SNS users in urban and rural areas. Papers on Environmental Science Information (The 27th Conference on Environmental Information Science)27: 335–340. [鬼塚健一郎・星野敏 ・橋本禅 (2013) 都市と農村におけるSNS利用者の地域意識に関する研究, 環境情報科学 (学術研究論文集) 27: 335–340].
51.
OnitsukaKHoshinoSNakatsukaM (2011) The current situation of the usage of websites to vitalize knowledge sharing in depopulated rural areas. Journal of Rural Planning Association30: 321–326. [鬼塚健一郎・星野敏・中塚雅也 (2011) 過疎地域における知識共有Web サイトの利用実態，農村計画学会誌 30: 321–326].
52.
PapacharissiZ (2015) Affective Publics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
ParksM (2011) Social networking sites as virtual communities. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp.105–123.
54.
PearceKEVitakJ (2016) Performing honor online: The affordances of social media for surveillance and impression management in an honor culture. New Media & Society18(11): 2595–2612.
55.
PrinslooMRowsellJ (2012) Introduction: Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education26(4): 271–277.
56.
RheingoldH (2012) Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
57.
ShawA (2017) Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart hall and interactive media technologies. Media Culture & Society39(4): 592–602.
58.
ShirkyC (2010) Cognitive Surplus: How Technology Makes Consumers into Collaborators. New York: Penguin.
SrinivasanR (2017) Whose Global Village? Rethinking How Technology Shapes Our World. New York, NY: New York University Press.
61.
TiidenbergKSiibakA (2018) Affordances, affect and audiences – Making sense of networked publics, introduction to AoIR 2017 special issue on networked publics. Studies of Transition States and Societies10(2): 1–9.
62.
ToshikiS (2001) Is Japan and classless society?Japan Quarterly48(2): 25–30.
63.
TurkleS (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
64.
van DijkJ (2020) The Digital Divide. Medford, MA: Polity Press.
65.
WilliamsonA (2009) Revitalising politics from the ground up: The role of digital media in promoting citizen-led democratic renewal. Representation45(3): 301–311.
66.
ZhaoY (2017) Global to village: Grounding communication research in rural China: Introduction. International Journal of Communication11(27): 4396-4422.
67.
ZuckermanE (2015) Digital Cosmopolitanism: Why We Think the Internet Connects Us, Why It Doesn’t, and How to Rewire It. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
