How are claims of environmental degradation and health risk and hazard socially constructed in mediated arenas? This article examines frames, sources and claims in articles from Ecuadorian news regarding the lawsuit against Chevron brought by thousands of indigenous peoples living in the Amazonian region, who claimed their health was at risk and ancestral lands destroyed by petroleum contamination. Findings indicated that the risk discussion at the heart of events and conflicts was subsumed by coverage that focused largely on the legal conflict as well as was indexed to the claims denying the hazard. The case has significance for understanding mediated claims of risk and responsibility through a lens of news production.
AdamB (2000) The media timescapes of BSE news. In: AllanSAdamBCarterC (eds) Environmental Risks and the Media. London: Routledge, pp.117–129.
2.
AdamBVan LoonJ (2000) Introduction: Repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory. In: AdamBBeckUvan LoonJ (eds) The Risk Society and beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: Sage, pp.1–32.
3.
AlvarezSDagninoEEscobarA (1998) Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.
AndersonA (1997) Media, Culture and the Environment. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5.
Associated Press (AP) (2007) Chevron Texaco Dice que Juicio en Ecuador Está Viciado [Chevron Texaco says the judgment in Ecuador is corrupted], 3September. Available at: eluniverso.com (accessed 28 September 2012).
6.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.
7.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–125.
8.
BennettWLPickardVWIozziDP. (2004) Managing the public sphere: Construction of the great globalization debate. Journal of Communication54(3): 437–455.
9.
BlumerH (1971) Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems18(3): 298–306.
10.
BoykoffM (2007) Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area39(2): 470–481.
11.
BoykoffMBoykoffJ (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the US Prestige Press. Global Environmental Change14: 125–136.
12.
CepekM (2012) The loss of oil: Constituting disaster in Amazonian Ecuador. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology17(3): 393–412.
13.
CherryMSneirsonJ (2012) Chevron, greenwashing, and the myth of ‘green oil companies’. Journal of Energy, Climate and Environment3: 133–154.
14.
DemerittD (2006) Science studies, climate change and the prospects for constructivist critique. Economy and Society35(3): 453–479.
15.
DesslerAParsonE (2010) The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
El Comercio (2003) El impacto de Texaco aún se siente en la Amazonia [Texaco’s impact is still felt in the Amazon], 17June. Available at: elcomercio.com (accessed 5 May 2011).
17.
El Comercio (2008) USD 8 300 millones en daños en Amazonia por petrolera Texaco [$8.3 billion in damages in the Amazon for Texaco], 1April. Available at: elcomercio.com (accessed 28 September 2012).
18.
El Universo (2006) Denuncian contaminación de Texaco en selvas de Ecuador [They denounce Texaco’s contamination in the Ecuadorian jungles], 8March. Available at: eluniverso.com (accessed 28 September 2012).
19.
El Universo (2007) Correa acusa a Texaco y respalda demanda [Correa accuses Texaco and backs lawsuit], 27April. Available at: eluniverso.com (accessed 28 September 2012).
20.
El Universo (2009) Ecuador anuncia fallo a favor en demanda Chevron [Ecuador announces ruling in favor of the Chevron demand], 1July. Available at: eluniverso.com (accessed 28 September 2012).
21.
FinerMJenkinsCPimmS. (2008) Oil and gas projects in the western Amazon: Threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PLoS ONE3(8): 1–9.
22.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
HansenA (1993) The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
24.
HansenA (2000) Claims-making and framing in British newspaper coverage of the ‘Brent Spar’ controversy. In: AllanSAdamBCarterC (eds) Environmental Risks and the Media. London: Routledge, pp.55–72.
25.
HilgersT (ed.) (2012) Clientelism in Everyday Latin American Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
27.
Jordan-TobarRPanchana-MacayA (2009) The media in Ecuador. In: AlbarranA (ed.) Handbook of Spanish Language Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 103–124.
28.
JosephS (2012) Protracted lawfare: The tale of Chevron Texaco in the Amazon. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment3(1): 70–91.
29.
KaspersonRERennOSlovicP. (1988) The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis8(2): 177–187.
30.
KimerlingJ (2006) Transnational operations, bi-national injustice: Chevron Texaco and indigenous Huaorani and Kichwa in the Amazon rainforest in Ecuador. American Indian Law Review31: 445–509.
31.
KimerlingJ (2012) Huaorani land rights in Ecuador: Oil, contact and conservation. Environmental Justice5(5): 236–251.
32.
McAteerEPulverS (2009) The Corporate Boomerang: Shareholder transnational advocacy networks targeting oil companies in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global Environmental Politics9(1): 1–30.
33.
MajorAAtwoodLE (2004) Environmental risks in the news: Issues, sources, problems and values. Public Understanding of Science13: 295–308.
34.
MazurA (2009) American generation of environmental warnings: Avian influenza and global warming. Research in Human Ecology16(1): 17–26.
35.
MurdockGPettsJHorlick-JonesT (2003) After amplification: Rethinking the role of the media in risk communication. In: PidgeonNKaspersonRSlovicP (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.156–178.
36.
NisbetMC (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development51(2): 12–23.
37.
QuandtT (2008) (No) news on the World Wide Web?Journalism Studies9(5): 717–738.
RobinsonEE (2002) Community frame analysis in Love Canal: Understanding messages in a contaminated community. Sociological Spectrum22: 139–169.
40.
SandmanPSachsmanDGreenbergM. (1987) Environmental Risk and the Press. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
41.
SawyerS (2004) Crude Chronicles: Indigenous Politics, Multinational Oil, and Neoliberalism in Ecuador. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
SawyerS (2007) Empire/multitude—state/civil society: Rethinking topographies of power through transnational connectivity in Ecuador and beyond. Social Analysis51(2): 64–85.
43.
SouthgateDWasserstromR (2009) Oil development, deforestation, and indigenous populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Paper presented at the 2009 Latin American studies association meeting, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June.
44.
WaisbordS (2002) Journalism, risk and patriotism. In: ZelizerBAllenS (eds) Journalism after September 11. London: Routledge, pp.201–220.
45.
WaisbordSPeruzzottiE (2009) The environmental story that wasn’t: Advocacy, journalism, and the asembleísmo movement in Argentina. Media, Culture & Society31(5): 691–709.
