With the apparent increase in the number of alternative political media, political pluralists are again faced with the question: does the proliferation of subaltern counter-publics lead to a multiplication of forces? Fragmentation in political culture is fuelled by the rise of identity politics that focuses on consumption not production. Party allegiances and class alliances give way to more fluid and informal networks of action. Postmodern theorists celebrate fragmentation because it allows the recognition of diversity in political desires, acknowledges difference between individuals and debunks the myth of homogenous political units leading ultimately to liberation. But for political efficacy there must be more than the apparent freedom that comes with embracing difference and diversity. This article argues that if we accept the description of society as fragmented, in order to create a viable political community then solidarity is crucial. In a global economy, solidarity can be mediated through new communication technologies but the challenge is to articulate the politics online with actual movements and struggles on the ground.
Association for Progressive Communications (APC) (2006) URL (consulted March 2006): http://www.apc.org/english/about/index.shtml .
2.
Atton, C. (2004) An Alternative Internet: Radical Media, Politics and Creativity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
Bauman, Z. (1997) Postmodernity and its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity.
4.
Benkler, Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. London: Yale University Press.
5.
Bennett, W.L. (2004) `New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism' , in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
Bennett, W.L. (2005) `Social Movements Beyond Borders: Understanding Two Eras of Transnational Activism', in D. della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds) Transnational Protest and Global Activism, pp. 203—27. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
Bohman, J. (2004) `Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and the Prospects for Transnational Democracy', in N. Crossley and J.M. Roberts (eds) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, pp. 131—56. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Braidotti, R. (1991) `The Subject in Feminism', Hypatia6(2): 155—72.
9.
Breslow, H. (1997) `Civil Society, Political Economy and the Internet' , in S. Jones (ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety, pp. 236—57. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Vol. 1 of The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Cleaver, H. (1999) `Computer Linked Social Movements and the Global Threat to Capitalism', URL (consulted March 2006): http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Cleaver/polnet.html
12.
Crossley, N. (2002) `Global Anti-Corporate Struggle: A Preliminary Analysis', British Journal of Sociology53(4): 667—91.
13.
Della Porta D. (2005) `Multiple Belongings, Tolerant Identities and the Construction of “Another Politics”: Between the European Social Forum and the Local Social fora', in D. della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds) Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999) Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006) Social Movements: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell .
16.
Della Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (eds) (2005) Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
Diani, M. (2001) `Social Movement Networks. Virtual and Real', in F. WebsterCulture and Politics in the Information Age, pp. 117—27. London: Routledge.
18.
Downey, J. and Fenton, N. (2003) `Constructing a Counter-Public Sphere', New Media and Society (5)2: 185—202.
19.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999) Cyber-Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High Technology Capitalism. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
20.
Fenton, N. (2000) `The Problematics of Postmodernism for Feminist Media Studies', Media, Culture and Society22(6): 723—41.
21.
Fenton, N. and Downey, J. (2003) `Counter Public Spheres and Global Modernity', Javnost — The Public (X)1: 15—33.
22.
Gamson, W. (1990) The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge : Polity.
24.
Habermas, J. (1992) `Further Reflections on the Public Sphere', in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 421—61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Habermas, J. (1998) Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory . Cambridge: Polity.
26.
Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
28.
Hill, K. and Hughes, J. (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
Jordon, T. and Taylor, P. (2004) Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels without a Cause?London: Routledge.
30.
Kavada, A. (2005) `Civil Society Organizations and the Internet: The Case of Amnesty International, Oxfam and the World Development Movement ', in Wilma de Jong, Martin Shaw and Neil Stammers (eds) Global Activism, Global Media, pp. 208—23. London: Pluto.
31.
Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
32.
Klein, N. (2000) No Logo. New York: Flamingo.
33.
Klein, N. (2002) Fences and Windows: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate. London: Flamingo.
34.
Mansbridge, J. (2001) `Complicating Oppositional Consciousness', in J. Mansbridge and A. Morris (eds) Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, pp. 238—64. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Melucci, A. (1996) The Playing Self. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
36.
Mouffe, C. (ed.) (1992) Dimensions of Radical Democracy; Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso.
37.
Mouffe, C. (1993) The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
38.
Negt, O. and Kluge, A. (1972) Public Sphere and Experience: Towards an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
39.
Norris, P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rheingold, H. (2002) Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
42.
Salter, L. (2003) `Democracy, New Social Movements and the Internet: A Habermasian Analysis', in M. McCaughey and M.D. Ayers (eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
43.
Sassen, S. (2005) `Electronic Markets and Activist Networks: The Weight of Social Logics in Digital Formations', in R. Latham and S. Sassen (eds) Digital Formations: New Architectures for Global Order, pp. 54—88. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Schiller, Herbert (1989) Culture Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Spivak, G. (1992) `French Feminism Revisited: Ethics and Politics' , in J. Butler and J. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge.
46.
Sunstein, C. (2001) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
47.
Tarrow, S. (1998) Power in Movement — Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Tomlinson, J. (1999) Globalization and Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
49.
Van der Donk, W., Loader, B.D., Nixon, P.G. and Rucht, D. (eds) (2004) Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. London: Routledge.
50.
Waters, M. (1995) Globalization. London: Routledge.
51.
World Energy Outlook (2002) ` World Energy Outlook 2002: Executive Summary', URL (consulted June 2005): http://www.worldenergy.org/wecgeis/publications/statements/stat2002.asp
52.
Zhao, Y. (2003) `Falun Gong, Identity and the Struggle over Meaning Inside and Outside China', in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
