This study examines leadership emergence in self-managed leisure sports groups, revealing how micro-cultural practices facilitate follower-to-leader transitions in truly flat, voluntary contexts. Drawing on qualitative data from four French groups, we demonstrate that conviviality functions as a dual mechanism: enabling emergence through convivial rituals whilst exercising concertive control via relational exclusion. We extend Badura et al.’s distal-proximal framework (2022) by operationalising micro-cultural mediation as a critical filter shaping who emerges, and advance leadership-in-interaction scholarship by revealing how direction, alignment, and commitment are accomplished through mundane practices rather than formal authority. Our findings identify three hybrid leadership configurations (coordinated sharing, follower-initiated co-leadership, substitutive leadership), four follower pathways, and a distinctive ‘ripple effect’ wherein accumulated helping prompts gradual identity transitions. This reconceptualises leadership as collectively accomplished through culturally embedded practices, advancing post-heroic, relational understandings of influence in low-stakes settings where formal authority is minimal and influence purely relational.
ActonBPFotiRJLordRG, et al. (2019) Putting emergence back in leadership emergence: a dynamic, multilevel, process-oriented framework. The Leadership Quarterly30(1): 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.002
2.
AghoA (2009) Perspectives of senior-level executives on effective followership and leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies16(2): 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809335360
3.
ArvedsenLDHassertLO (2020) Accomplishing leadership-in-interaction by mobilizing available information and communication technology objects in a virtual context. Leadership16(5): 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020917819
BaduraKLGrijalvaEGalvinBM, et al. (2020) Motivation to lead: a meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology105(4): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000439
6.
BaduraKLGalvinBMLeeMY (2022) Leadership emergence: an integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology107(11): 2069–2100. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000997
7.
BarkerJR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 408–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393374
CarsonJBTeslukPEMarroneJA (2007) Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal50(5): 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159921
11.
CarstenMUhl-BienMWestB, et al. (2010) Exploring social constructions of followership: a qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly21: 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.015
12.
CliftonJLarssonMSchnurrS (2020) Leadership in interaction. An introduction to the special issue. Leadership16(5): 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020954790
13.
CoylePTGoswamiAFotiRJ (2023) Using a role-based approach to develop a comprehensive typology of follower characteristics and behaviors. Group & Organization Management48(2): 468–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231162725
De DreuCKWVan VianenAEM (2001) Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior22(3): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.71
16.
DeciELRyanRM (2012) Self-determination theory. In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Sage Publications Ltd, Vol. 1, pp. 416–436.
DeRueSAshfordS (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review35(4): 627–647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.53503267
19.
DrathWHMcCauleyCDPalusCJ, et al. (2008) Direction, alignment, commitment: toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly19(6): 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.003
20.
FairhurstGT (2008) Discursive leadership: a communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly21(4): 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907313714
21.
GadelshinaG (2020) Shared leadership: struggles over meaning in daily instances of uncertainty. Leadership16(5): 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020935748
22.
GarfinkelH (2023) Studies in ethnomethodology. In: Social Theory Re-Wired. 3rd edition. Routledge.
23.
GioiaDACorleyKGHamiltonAL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods16(1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
24.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
25.
HannaAASmithTAKirkmanBL, et al. (2021) The emergence of emergent leadership: a comprehensive framework and directions for future research. Journal of Management47(1): 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320965683
26.
HeylerSGArmenakisAAWalkerAG, et al. (2016) A qualitative study investigating the ethical decision-making process: a proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly27(5): 788–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003
HollanderE (1992b) The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science1: 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509752
29.
JiangXSnyderKLiJ, et al. (2021) How followers create leaders: the impact of effective followership on leader emergence in self-managing teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice25(4): 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000159
30.
KellermanB (2008) Followership: How Followers are Creating Change and Changing Leaders. Harvard Business School Publishing.
31.
KingN (1998) Template analysis. In: SymonGCassellC (eds) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, pp. 118–134.
32.
KlasmeierKNRowoldJ (2020) A multilevel investigation of predictors and outcomes of shared leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior41(9): 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2477
33.
KwokNHanigSBrownDJ, et al. (2018) How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: a social network analysis. The Leadership Quarterly29(6): 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.003
34.
LarssonMBarfodJRCliftonJ, et al. (2025) Exploring the realization of moments of leadership: a methodological approach. Organization Studies46(9): 1307–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406251336017
35.
LockeK (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. Sage Publications.
36.
ManzCCSimsHP (1987) Leading workers to lead themselves: the external leadership of Self- managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly32(1): 106–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392745
37.
MathieuJEKukenbergerMRD'innocenzoL, et al. (2015) Modeling reciprocal team cohesion–performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. Journal of Applied Psychology100(3): 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038898
38.
MaznevskiMLChudobaKM (2000) Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science11(5): 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
MehraASmithBDixonA, et al. (2006) Distributed leadership in teams: the network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly17(3): 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003
42.
MondadaL (2016) Challenges of multimodality: language and the body in social interaction. Journal of SocioLinguistics20(3): 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
43.
NgJYYNtoumanisNThøgersen-NtoumaniC, et al. (2012) Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science7(4): 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
44.
OspinaSMFoldyEGFairhurstGT, et al. (2020) Collective dimensions of leadership: connecting theory and method. Human Relations73(4): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719899714
45.
PearceCLCongerJA (2003) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage Publications.
46.
RomelaerP (2005), L’entretien de recherche. In: RousselPWacheuxF (eed.) Management des Ressources Humaines. De Boeck, p. 101–137.
47.
RybnicekRBergnerSGutschelhoferA (2019) How individual needs influence motivation effects: a neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory. Review of Managerial Science13(2): 443–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0252-1
48.
SilvermanD (1998) Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford University.
49.
StraussACorbinJM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage.
50.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care19(6): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
UlhøiJPMüllerS (2014) Mapping the landscape of shared leadership: a review and synthesis. International Journal of Leadership Studies8(2): 66–87.
53.
Van De MieroopD (2020) A deontic perspective on the collaborative, multimodal accomplishment of leadership. Leadership16(5): 592–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019893824
54.
VandergriffD (2019) Adopting Mission Command: Developing Leaders to Operate in a Superior Command Culture. Naval Institute Press.
55.
WangDWaldmanDAZhangZ (2014) A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology99(2): 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034531
56.
WeinbergRMcDermottM (2002) A comparative analysis of sport and business organizations: factors perceived critical for organizational success. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology14(4): 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200290103563
57.
Wolfram CoxJMadisonKEvaN (2022) Revisiting emergence in emergent leadership: an integrative, multi-perspective review. The Leadership Quarterly33(1): 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101579
58.
WuQCormicanKChenG (2020) A meta-analysis of shared leadership: antecedents, consequences, and moderators. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies27(1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818820862
59.
YinRK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd edition. Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
