This study delves into the intricate relationship between leadership and followership within the context of online social movements, aligning with the Critical Leadership Studies (CLS) framework. In an era dominated by digital communication, social media platforms offer a unique vantage point to re-examine the pivotal, yet often overlooked, role of power in shaping leader-follower interactions. Through meticulous textual analysis, the research uncovers key themes such as the co-construction of leadership and the emergence of partnership relationships, both of which are facilitated by emotional engagement and projection. The findings illuminate a dialectical perspective on how leadership is collectively enacted in virtual spaces, challenging traditional notions of hierarchical authority. This work not only enriches the discourse on the meaning-making processes inherent in leadership but also highlights the broader implications for followership empowerment in the social media landscape.
AlmeidaTRamalhoNCEstevesF (2021) Can you be a follower even when you do not follow the leader? Yes, you can. Leadership17(3): 336–364.
2.
AlvaresCDahlgrenP (2016) Populism, extremism and media: mapping an uncertain terrain. European Journal of Communication31(1): 46–57.
3.
AlvarezJLSvejenovaS (2005) Sharing Executive Power: Roles and Relationships at the Top. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AlvessonMSveningssonS (2003) The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing “leadership” “leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly14(3): 359–381.
5.
Attride-StirlingJ (2001) Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research1(3): 385–405.
6.
AvolioBGardnerW (2005) Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly16: 315–338.
7.
AvolioBSosikJJKahaiSS, et al. (2014) E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly25(1): 105–131.
8.
BarkerR (1997) How can we train leaders if we do not know what leadership is?Human Relations50(4): 343–362.
9.
BarkerR (2001) The nature of leadership. Human Relations54(4): 469–494.
10.
BassB (1985) Rethinking leadership: a way forward for teaching leadership?Leadership and Organization Development27(2): 144–158.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2015) The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BraccialeRMassimilianoAAntonioM (2021) Does populism go viral? How Italian leaders engage citizens through social media. Information. Communications Society24: 1–18.
14.
BucherTHelmondA (2018) The affordances of social media platforms. In: BurgessJPoellTMarwickA (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Media. London and New York: Sage Publications Ltd.
15.
BurnsJ (1978) Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
16.
CaianiMGrazianoPR (2016) Varieties of populism: insights from the Italian case. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica46(02): 243–267.
17.
CoeL (1993) The Telegraph: A History of Morse’s Invention and its Predecessors in the United States. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company.
18.
CollinsonD (2011) Critical leadership studies. In: BrymanACollinsonDGrintK, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Leadership. London: Sage, 179–192.
19.
CollinsonDCollinsonM (2009) `Blended leadership’: employee perspectives on effective leadership in the UK further education sector. Leadership5(3): 365–380.
20.
CrevaniLLindgrenMPackendorffJ (2010) Leadership, not leaders: on the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management26: 77–86.
21.
DachlerHHoskingD (1995) The primacy of relations in socially constructing organisational realities. In: HoskingDDachlerHGergenK (eds) Management and Organisation: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot: Avebury.
22.
DavisF (1979) Yearning for Yesterday: A Sociology of Nostalgia. New York: Free Press.
23.
DeRueDSAshfordSJ (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review35: 627–647.
24.
EmpsonLLangleyASergiV (2023) When Everyone and No One is a Leader: constructing individual leadership identities while sustaining an organizational narrative of collective leadership. Organization Studies44(2): 201–227.
25.
FairhurstGT (2007) Discursive Leadership: In Conversation with Leadership Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
FiedlerF (1996) Research on leadership selection and training: one view of the future. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 241–250.
27.
FiedlerFChemersMMaharL (1975) Improving Leadership Effectiveness: The Leader Match Concept. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
28.
FletcherJ (2004) The paradox of post-heroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly15(5): 647–661.
29.
ForsterJBrowneM (1996) Principles of Strategic Management. South Melbourne: Macmillan.
30.
FotakiMForoughiH (2022) Extinction Rebellion: green activism and the fantasy of leaderlessness in a decentralized movement. Leadership18(2): 224–246.
31.
FrisinaM (2005) Learn to lead by following. Nursing Management36(3): 12.
32.
GemmillGOakleyJ (1992) Leadership: an alienating social myth?Human Relations45(2): 113–129.
33.
GerbaudoP (2012) Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.
34.
GibsonJJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: ShawRBransfordJ (eds) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 67–82.
35.
GilaniPBolatENordbergD, et al. (2020) Mirror, mirror on the wall: shifting leader-follower power dynamics in a social media context. Leadership16(3): 343–363.
36.
GoodwinN (2006) Leadership in Health Care – A European Perspective. London: Routledge.
37.
GrintK (2010) The sacred in leadership: separation, sacrifice and silence. Organization Studies31: 89–107.
38.
GronnP (2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly13: 423–451.
39.
HameleersMBosLde VreeseCH (2016) “They did it”: the effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research44(6): 870–900.
40.
HoskingDM (1988) ORGANIZING, leadership and skilful PROCESS[1]. Journal of Management Studies25: 147–166.
41.
HouseRAdityaR (1997) The social scientific study of leadership: quo vadis?Journal of Management23(3): 409–473.
42.
JamesonJ (2007) Investigating collaborative leadership for communities of practice in learning and skills. In: Practitioner Study Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
43.
JosephT (2016) Developing the leader-follower relationship: perceptions of leaders and followers. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics13(1): 118-130.
44.
KellermanB (2012) The End of Leadership. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
45.
LewinKLippittRWhiteRK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. The Journal of Social Psychology10: 269–299.
46.
LievrouwL (2011) Alternative and Activist New Media. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
47.
LobbedezE (2024) Absorptive Resisting Work: how the yellow vests deployed resistance to and through violence. Organization Studies45(3): 433–456.
48.
LordRBrownD (2004) Leadership Processes and Follower Self-Identity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
49.
MaroosisJ (2008). Leadership: a partnership in reciprocal fol- lowing. In RiggioRChaleffILipman-BlumenJ(eds), The Art of Followership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 17–24.
50.
McCarthyJZaldM (1973) The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalism and Resource Mobilisation. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
51.
MeindlJ (1995) The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: a social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly6(3): 329–341.
52.
MeindlJREhrlichSDukerichJM (1985) The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly30: 78–102.
53.
NielsenJS (2011) The Myth of Leadership: Creating Leaderless Organizations. London: Hachette.
54.
NorthousePG (2007) Leadership: Theory and Practice. 4th editionThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
OberschallA (1973) Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
56.
O’ReillyDReedM (2011) The grit in the oyster: professionalism, managerialism and leaderism as discourses of UK public services modernization. Organization Studies32: 1079–1101.
57.
PearceCCongerJ (2003) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows & Whys of Leadership. London: Sage.
58.
PearceCSimsH (2000) Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: an examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviours. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice6(2): 172–197.
59.
PrasadS (2017) Effective leadership in democracy. Open Journal of Political Science07: 345–352.
60.
RaelinJA (2016) Imagine there are no leaders: reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership12: 131–158.
61.
RickettsKGLadewigH (2008) A path analysis of community leadership within viable rural communities in Florida. Leadership4(2): 137–157.
62.
RopoASauerESalovaaraP (2013) Embodiment of leadership through material place. Leadership9(3): 378–395.
63.
SchmidtGB (2014) Virtual leadership: an important leadership context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology7(2): 182–187.
64.
SchmidtGBVan DellenSA (2022) Leadership of place in virtual environments. Leadership18(1): 186–202.
65.
SmircichLMorganG (1982) Leadership: the management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science18: 257–273.
66.
StauthGTurnerBS (1988) Nietzsche’s Dance: Resentment, Reciprocity and Resistance in Social Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
67.
SutherlandNLandCBöhmS (2014) Anti-leaders(hip) in social movement organizations: the case of autonomous grassroots groups. Organization21(6): 759–781.
VivianiL (2017) A political sociology of populism and leadership. SocietàMutamentoPolitica8(15): 279–303.
70.
WeberM (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
71.
WesternS (2014) Autonomist leadership in leaderless movements: anarchists leading the way. Ephemera14(4): 673–698.
72.
WildschutTBruderMRobertsonS, et al. (2014) Collective nostalgia: a group-level emotion that confers unique benefits on the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology107(5): 844–863.
73.
WilsonS (2020) Pandemic leadership: lessons from New Zealand’s approach to COVID-19. Leadership16(3): 279–293.
74.
WirzDS (2018) Persuasion through emotion? An experimental test of the emotion-eliciting nature of populist communication. International Journal of Communication12: 1114–1138.
75.
WoodM (2005) The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1101–1121.
76.
YoungsR (2019) Civic activism unleashed. In: New Hope or False Dawn for Democracy?New York: Oxford University Press.
77.
YuklG (1989) Managerial leadership: a review of theory and research. Journal of Management15(3): 251–289.
78.
YuklG (2010) Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddler River, NJ: Person Education.
79.
ZaldMAshR (1966) Social movement organizations: growth, decay and change. Social Forces44(3): 327–340.
80.
ZoonenL (2005) Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
