This study examines in which interactions and why followers’ behaviors can be perceived as stressful by leaders. Therefore, leaders were interviewed about particularly stressful interactions with a follower in face-to-face, virtual and written interactions. We find leaders’ stressors at work to fit three categories: leader’s loss of control, (potential) loss of the leader’s valuable resources, and threats to leader’s role. Moreover, we identify diverse daily as well as prototypical patterns of how leaders deal with some of them. Additionally, we identify undesirable work-life events and find a prototypical resilient leader characterized by feeling nearly no stress. Our study reduces the current research gap of mostly considering only leader behavior to be stressful (for followers).
AldwinCM (2007) Stress, Coping, and Development: An Integrative Perspective. 2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press.
2.
AlmeidaTRamalhoNCEstevesF (2021) Can you be a follower even when you do not follow the leader? Yes, you can. Leadership17(3): 336–364.
3.
AvolioBJKahaiSS (2003) Adding the “E” to e-leadership: how it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics31(4): 325–338.
4.
BanksGCGootyJRossRL, et al. (2018) Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: a review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly29(1): 236–251.
5.
BanksGCDionneSDMastMS, et al. (2022) Leadership in the digital era: a review of who, what, when, where, and why. The Leadership Quarterly33(5): 101634.
6.
BarleySRMeyersonDEGrodalS (2011) E-Mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science22(4): 887–906.
7.
BarsadeSG (2002) The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly47(4): 644–675.
8.
BastardozNVan VugtM (2019) The nature of followership: evolutionary analysis and review. The Leadership Quarterly30(1): 81–95.
9.
BlomMLundgrenM (2020) The (in) voluntary follower. Leadership16(2): 163–179.
10.
BowlingNAAlarconGMBraggCB, et al. (2015) A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload. Work & Stress29(2): 95–113.
11.
BrownRDuckJJimmiesonN (2014) E-mail in the workplace: the role of stress appraisals and normative response pressure in the relationship between e-mail stressors and employee strain. International Journal of Stress Management21(4): 325–347.
12.
BrymanAStephensM‘a CampoC (1996) The importance of context: qualitative research and the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly7(3): 353–370.
13.
CarstenMKUhl-BienMHuangL (2018) Leader perceptions and motivation as outcomes of followership role orientation and behavior. Leadership14(6): 731–756.
CheXXZhouZEKesslerSR, et al. (2017) Stressors beget stressors: the effect of passive leadership on employee health through workload and work–family conflict. Work & Stress31(4): 338–354.
16.
CohenS (1980) Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: a review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin88(1): 82–108.
17.
CoyleA (2016) Introduction to qualitative psychological research. In: LyonsECoyleA (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data in Psycholog. London: Sage, 9–30.
18.
DanielsKGuppyA (1994) Occupational stress, social support, job control, and psychological well-being. Human Relations47(12): 1523–1544.
19.
DayDVLordRG (1988) Executive leadership and organizational performance: suggestions for a new theory and methodology. Journal of Management14(3): 453–464.
20.
DayAScottNKellowayKE (2010) Information and communication technology: implications for job stress and employee well-being. In: PerrewePLGansterDC (eds) New Developments in Theoretical and Conceptual Approaches to Job Stress: Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being. London, UK: Emerald, 317–350.
21.
De WitteHPienaarJDe CuyperN (2016) Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies on the association between job insecurity and health and well‐being: is there causal evidence?Australian Psychologist51(1): 18–31.
22.
DeLongisACoyneJCDakofG, et al. (1982) Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status. Health Psychology1(2): 119–136.
23.
DelugaRJ (1991) The relationship of subordinate upward‐influencing behavior, health care manager interpersonal stress, and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology21(1): 78–88.
24.
DonaldITaylorPJohnsonS, et al. (2005) Work environments, stress, and productivity: an examination using Asset. International Journal of Stress Management12(4): 409–423.
25.
EinolaKAlvessonM (2021) When ‘good’leadership backfires: dynamics of the leader/follower relation. Organization Studies42(6): 845–865.
26.
FolkmanSMoskowitzJT (2004) Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology55: 745–774.
27.
FordJHardingN (2018) Followers in leadership theory: fiction, fantasy and illusion. Leadership14(1): 3–24.
28.
FrankenhaeuserMGardellB (1976) Underload and overload in working life: outline of a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Human Stress2(3): 35–46.
29.
FrenchJRPRavenB (1959) The bases of social power. In: ShafritzJMOttJSJangYS (eds) Classics of Organization Theory. 8th ed.Wadsworth: Cengage Learning Emea, 251–260.
30.
FriedmanRACurrallSC (2003) Conflict escalation: dispute exacerbating elements of e-mail communication. Human Relations56(11): 1325–1347.
31.
GauntRBenjaminO (2007) Job insecurity, stress and gender: the moderating role of gender ideology. Community, Work & Family10(3): 341–355.
32.
GerstenJLangnerJEisenbergL, et al. (1974) Child behavior and life events: undesirable life events or change per se? In: DohrenwendBSDohrenwendBP (eds) Stressful Life Events: Their Nature and Effects. New York: Wiley.
33.
GesangESüßS (2021) A shift in perspective: examining the impact of perceived follower behavior on leaders. Scandinavian Journal of Management37(2): 101156.
34.
GioiaDACorleyKGHamiltonAL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods16(1): 15–31.
35.
GraenGBHuiC (2001) Approaches to leadership: toward a complete contingency model of face-to-face leadership. In: ErezMKleinbeckUThierryH (eds) Work Motivation in the Context of a Globalizing Economy. New York: Psychology Press, 215–229.
36.
HackmanJRWagemanR (2007) Asking the right questions about leadership: discussion and conclusions. American Psychologist62(1): 43–47.
37.
HalbeslebenJRNeveuJPPaustian-UnderdahlSC, et al. (2014) Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management40(5): 1334–1364.
38.
HanGHHarmsPDBaiY (2017) Nightmare bosses: the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ sleep, emotions, and creativity. Journal of Business Ethics145(1): 21–31.
39.
HarmsPDCredéMTynanM, et al. (2017) Leadership and stress: a meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly28(1): 178–194.
40.
HeroldDM (1977) Two-way influence processes in leader-follower dyads. Academy of Management Journal20(2): 224–237.
41.
HobfollSE (1989) Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist44(3): 513–524.
42.
HoganRKaiserRB (2005) What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology9(2): 169–180.
43.
HunterLWThatcherSM (2007) Feeling the heat: effects of stress, commitment, and job experience on job performance. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 953–968.
44.
IliesRJohnsonMDJudgeTA, et al. (2011) A within‐individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: dispositional and situational moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior32(1): 44–64.
45.
IrmerBEChangABordiaP (2000) The development of social and task cohesion in computer-mediated and face-to-face task groups. Academy of Management Proceedings2000(1): A1–A6.
46.
JacksonSESchulerRS (1985) A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes36(1): 16–78.
47.
JohnsonSK (2008) I second that emotion: effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly19(1): 1–19.
48.
KannerADCoyneJCSchaeferC, et al. (1981) Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine4(1): 1–39.
49.
KatzDKahnRL (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
50.
KelleyRE (1988) In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review66(6): 1–8.
51.
KelleyRE (2008) Rethinking followership. In: RiggioREChaleffILipman-BlumenJ (eds) The Art of Followership: How Great Followers Create Great Leaders and Organizations. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 5–15.
52.
KerstingADorschMKreulichC, et al. (2005) Trauma and grief 2–7 years after termination of pregnancy because of fetal anomalies–a pilot study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology26(1): 9–14.
53.
KinmanGJonesF (2005) Lay representations of workplace stress: what do people really mean when they say they are stressed?Work & Stress19(2): 101–120.
54.
KivimäkiMJokelaMNybergST, et al. (2015) Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603 838 individuals. The Lancet386(10005): 1739–1746.
55.
LamJFanWMoenP (2014) Is insecurity worse for well-being in turbulent times? Mental health in context. Society and Mental Health4(1): 55–73.
56.
LePineJAPodsakoffNPLePineMA (2005) A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: an explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal48(5): 764–775.
57.
MastenAS (2011) Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy. Development and Psychopathology23(2): 493–506.
58.
MatthewsMJMatthewsSHWangDD, et al. (2022) Tweet, like, subscribe! Understanding leadership through social media use. The Leadership Quarterly33(1): 101580.
59.
MazzolaJJSchonfeldISSpectorPE (2011) What qualitative research has taught us about occupational stress. Stress and Health27(2): 93–110.
60.
McKee‐RyanFMVirickMPrussiaGE, et al. (2009) Life after the layoff: getting a job worth keeping. Journal of Organizational Behavior30(4): 561–580.
61.
McLeanPD (1976) Depression as a specific response to stress. In: SarasonIGSpielbergerCD (eds). Stress and Anxiety. Hemisphere.
62.
MohrATPuckJF (2007) Role conflict, general manager job satisfaction and stress and the performance of IJVs. European Management Journal25(1): 25–35.
63.
NeumannRStrackF (2000) “Mood contagion”: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(2): 211–223.
64.
NixonAEMazzolaJJBauerJ, et al. (2011) Can work make you sick? A meta-analysis of the relationships between job stressors and physical symptoms. Work & Stress25(1): 1–22.
65.
OcB (2018) Contextual leadership: a systematic review of how con-textual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly29(1): 218–235.
66.
OcBBashshurMR (2013) Followership, leadership and social influence. The Leadership Quarterly24(6): 919–934.
67.
OtisNPelletierLG (2005) A motivational model of daily hassles, physical symptoms, and future work intentions among police officers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35(10): 2193–2214.
68.
PearlinLI (1989) The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior30(3): 241–256.
69.
PettigrewAM (1972) Information control as a power resource. Sociology6(2): 187–204.
70.
PodsakoffNPLePineJALePineMA (2007) Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology92(2): 438–454.
71.
PrattMGKaplanSWhittingtonR (2019) Editorial essay: the tumult over transparency: decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Administrative Science Quarterly65(1): 1–19.
72.
PurvanovaRKBonoJE (2009) Transformational leadership in context: face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly20(3): 343–357.
73.
RabkinJGStrueningEL (1976) Live events, stress, and illness. Science194(4269): 1013–1020.
74.
ReinkeKChamorro-PremuzicT (2014) When email use gets out of control: understanding the relationship between personality and email overload and their impact on burnout and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior36: 502–509.
75.
RobinsonOC (2014) Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology11(1): 25–41.
76.
RosenCCSimonLSGajendranRS, et al. (2019) Boxed in by your inbox: implications of daily e-mail demands for managers’ leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology104(1): 19–33.
77.
SchmidtSRoeslerUKusserowT, et al. (2014) Uncertainty in the workplace: examining role ambiguity and role conflict, and their link to depression—a meta-analysis. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology23(1): 91–106.
78.
ShamirB (2007) From passive recipients to active co-producers: the roles of followers in the leadership process. In: ShamirBPillaiRBlighM, et al. (eds) Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl. Stamford: IAP.
79.
SiangchokyooNKlingerRLCampion (eds) (2020) Follower transformation as the linchpin of transformational leadership theory: a systematic review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly31(1): 101341.
80.
SmithBWDalenJWigginsK, et al. (2008) The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine15(3): 194–200.
81.
StansfeldSCandyB (2006) Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health32(6): 443–462.
82.
SzaboEReberGWeiblerJ, et al. (2001) Values and behavior orientation in leadership studies: reflections based on findings in three German-speaking countries. The Leadership Quarterly12(2): 219–244.
83.
ThackerRAWayneSJ (1995) An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management21(4): 739–756.
84.
ThompsonHL (2010) The Stress Effect: Why Smart Leaders Make Dumb Decisions--and what to Do about it. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
85.
Uhl-BienMRiggioRELoweKB, et al. (2014) Followership theory: a review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly25(1): 83–104.
86.
Van den BroeckAVansteenkisteMDe WitteH, et al. (2010) Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology83(4): 981–1002.
87.
VeronaEKilmerA (2007) Stress exposure and affective modulation of aggressive behavior in men and women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology116(2): 410–421.
88.
VolmerJ (2015) Followers’ daily reactions to social conflicts with supervisors: the moderating role of core self-evaluations and procedural justice perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly26(5): 719–731.
89.
WayneSJShoreLMLidenRC (1997) Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal40(1): 82–111.
90.
WebsterJRBeehrTALoveK (2011) Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: the role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior79(2): 505–516.
91.
WilliamsMJ (2014) Serving the self from the seat of power: goals and threats predict leaders’ self-interested behavior. Journal of Management40(5): 1365–1395.
92.
YuklG (2008) How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly19(6): 708–722.
93.
YuklGFalbeCM (1991) Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology76(3): 416–423.
94.
ZaleznikA (1965) The dynamics of subordinacy. Harvard Business Review43(3): 119–131.
95.
ZimmermannPWitAGillR (2008) The relative importance of leadership behaviours in virtual and face-to-face communication settings. Leadership4(3): 321–337.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
