Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonakis
J
Atwater
L
(2002 ) Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory . The Leadership Quarterly 13 (6 ): 673 –704 .
2.
Carsten
MK
Uhl-Bien
M
West
BJ
, et al. (2010 ) Exploring social constructions of followership: a qualitative study . The Leadership Quarterly 21 : 543 –562 .
3.
Collinson
D
(2005 ) Questions of distance . Leadership 1 (2 ): 235 –250 .
4.
Collinson
DL
(2006 ) Rethinking followership: a post-structuralist analysis of follower identities . The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2 ): 172 –189 .
5.
Collinson
DL
(2011 ) Critical leadership studies . In:
Bryman
A
Collinson
D
Grint
K
, et al. (eds), The SAGE handbook of leadership . London : SAGE , pp. 179 –192 .
6.
Cooper
R
(2010 ) The generalized social body: distance and technology . Organization 17 (2 ): 242 –256 .
7.
Napier
BJ
Ferris
GR
(1993 ) Distance in organizations . Human Resource Management Review 3 (4 ): 321 –357 .
8.
McCabe
D
(2015 ) The tyranny of distance: Kafka and the problem of distance in bureaucratic organizations . Organization 22 (1 ): 58 –77 .
9.
Olson
GM
Olson
J
(2000 ) Distance matters . Human-Computer Interaction 15 (2/3 ): 139 –179 .
10.
Sy
T
(2010 ) What do you think of followers? examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 113 (2 ): 73 –84 .
11.
Wilson
JM
O’Leary
MB
Metiu
A
, et al. (2008 ) Perceived proximity in virtual work: explaining the paradox of far-but-close . Organization Studies 29 (07 ): 979 –1002 .