Hubris among corporate leaders has recently gained much academic attention, with strategy and corporate governance research focusing mainly on negative aspects, such as overreach by strategic leaders during acquisitions. However, adjacent disciplines including entrepreneurship and innovation identify positive consequences too. How comparable are these findings? Appraising the conceptual and methodological approaches, we find that while the hubris concept has many strengths, several challenges remain. We suggest conceptual and empirical research directions aimed at increasing construct clarity, validating the hubris construct and extending the scope of hubris research. We also propose that research with boards and top management teams can help clarify how they make decisions to cope with the ‘dark side’ of hubris without suppressing ‘bright side’ outcomes.
AckermanRAWittEADonnellanMB, et al. (2011)
What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure?Assessment18: 67–87.
2.
AktasNCrociESimsirSA (2016)
Corporate governance and takeover outcomes. Corporate Governance: An International Review24: 242–252.
3.
AktasNde BodtERollR (2009)
Learning, hubris and corporate serial acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance15: 543–561.
4.
AlonsoPLewisGB (2001)
Public service motivation and job performance – evidence from.The Federal Sector. American Review of Public Administration31: 363–380.
5.
AmernicJCraigR (2013)
Leadership discourse, culture, and corporate ethics: CEO-speak at News Corporation. Journal of Business Ethics118: 379.
6.
AmernicJCraigR (2017)
CEO speeches and safety culture: British Petroleum before the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Critical Perspectives on Accounting47: 61–80.
7.
AmesDRRosePAndersonCP (2006)
The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality40: 440–450.
8.
AndersonCAmesDRGoslingSD (2008)
Punishing hubris: the perils of overestimating one's status in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34: 90–101.
9.
APA (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5.
Washington:
American Psychological Association.
10.
AshforthBEAnandV (2003)
The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior25: 1–52.
11.
BaronRA (2000)
Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: cognitive and social factors in entrepreneurs’ success. Current Directions in Psychological Science9: 15–18.
12.
BebchukLAFriedJM (2004) Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
13.
BennettRJRobinsonSL (2000)
Development of a measure of workplace deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology85: 349–360.
14.
BerglasS (2014)
Rooting Out Hubris, Before a Fall. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles2–4.
15.
BerkovitchENarayananMP (1993)
Motives for takeovers: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis28: 347–362.
16.
BernardoAEWelchI (2001)
On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy10: 301–330.
17.
BethelJEHuGWangQH (2009)
The market for shareholder voting rights around mergers and acquisitions: evidence from institutional daily trading and voting. Journal of Corporate Finance15: 129–145.
18.
BillettMTQianY (2008)
Are overconfident CEOs born or made? Evidence of self-attribution bias from frequent acquirers. Management Science54: 1037–1051.
19.
BjørnskovCSønderskovKM (2013)
Is social capital a good concept?Social Indicators Research114: 1225–1242.
20.
BodolicaVSpraggonM (2011)
Behavioral governance and self-conscious emotions: unveiling governance implications of authentic and hubristic pride. Journal of Business Ethics100: 535–550.
21.
BoivieSBednarMKAguileraRV, et al. (2016)
Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals10: 319–407.
22.
BollaertHPetitV (2010)
Beyond the dark side of executive psychology: current research and new directions. European Management Journal28: 362–376.
23.
BrownRSarmaN (2007)
CEO overconfidence, CEO dominance and corporate acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business59: 358–379.
BusenitzLWBarneyJB (1997)
Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing12: 9–30.
27.
BuylTBooneCWadeJB (2017) CEO narcissism, risk-taking, and resilience: an empirical analysis in U.S. commercial banks. Journal of Management. Epub ahead of print 13 March 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0149206317699521.
28.
CamererCLovalloD (1999)
Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach. American Economic Review89: 306–318.
29.
CampbellWKHoffmanBJCampbellSM, et al. (2011)
Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review21: 268–284.
30.
CassarGGibsonB (2007)
Forecast rationality in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management45: 283–302.
31.
ChangCHFerrisDLJohnsonRE, et al. (2012)
Core self-evaluations: a review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management38: 81–128.
32.
ChatterjeeAHambrickDC (2007)
It’s all about me: narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly52: 351–386.
33.
ClaxtonGOwenDSadler-SmithE (2015)
Hubris in leadership: a peril of unbridled intuition.Leadership11: 57–78.
34.
ColquittJA (2001)
On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. The Journal of Applied Psychology86: 386–400.
35.
CormierDLapointe-AntunesPMagnanM (2016)
CEO power and CEO hubris: a prelude to financial misreporting?Management Decision54: 522–554.
36.
DaltonDRAguinisH (2013)
Measurement malaise in strategic management studies: the case of corporate governance research. Organizational Research Methods16: 88–99.
37.
de HaanE (2015)
The leadership shadow: how to recognise and avoid derailment, hubris and overdrive. Leadership12: 504–512.
38.
DeVellisRF (2011) Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
London, UK:
SAGE.
39.
DouglasHBoreMMunroD (2012)
Distinguishing the dark triad: evidence from the five-factor model and the Hogan development survey. Psychology3 : 237–242.
40.
EnglmaierF (2010)
Managerial optimism and investment choice. Managerial and Decision Economics31: 303–310.
41.
ErezAJudgeTA (2001)
Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology86: 1270–1279.
42.
FastNJSivanathanNMayerND, et al. (2012)
Power and overconfident decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes117: 249–260.
43.
FerrisSPJayaramanNSabherwalS (2013)
CEO overconfidence and international merger and acquisition activity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis48: 137–164.
44.
FordR (2006)
Why we fail: how hubris, hamartia, and anagnosis shape organizational behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly17: 481–489.
GalassoASimcoeTS (2011)
CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science57: 1469–1484.
47.
GavettiGLevinthalDOcasioW (2007)
Neo-Carnegie: the Carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science18: 523–536.
48.
GerringJ (1999)
What makes a concept good? A critical framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity31: 357–393.
49.
GervaisSGoldsteinI (2007)
The positive effects of biased self-perceptions in firms. Review of Finance11: 453–496.
50.
GoldmanA (2009) Destructive Leaders and Dysfunctional Organizations: A Therapeutic Approach.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
51.
GrantAM (2008)
Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. The Journal of Applied Psychology93: 48–58.
52.
HaidtJ (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.
New York, NY:
Pantheon Books.
53.
HaynesKTHittMACampbellJT (2015)
The dark side of leadership: towards a mid-range theory of hubris and greed in entrepreneurial contexts. Journal of Management Studies52: 479–505.
54.
HaywardMLAHambrickDC (1997)
Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 103–127.
55.
HaywardMLARindovaVPPollockTG (2004)
Believing one’s own press: the causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal25: 637–653.
56.
HaywardMLAShepherdDAGriffinD (2006)
A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science52: 160–172.
57.
HaywardMLAForsterWRSarasvathySD, et al. (2010)
Beyond hubris: how highly confident entrepreneurs rebound to venture again. Journal of Business Venturing25: 569–578.
58.
HillADKernDAWhiteMA (2012)
Building understanding in strategy research: the importance of employing consistent terminology and convergent measures. Strategic Organization10: 187–200.
59.
HillerNJHambrickDC (2005)
Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal26: 297–319.
60.
HillmanAJDalzielT (2003)
Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. The Academy of Management Review28: 383–396.
61.
HillmanAJKeimGDSchulerD (2004)
Corporate political activity: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management30: 837–857.
62.
HirshleiferDLowATeohSH (2012)
Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?The Journal of Finance67: 1457–1498.
63.
HmieleskiKMBaronRA (2009)
Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: a social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal52: 473–488.
JonasonPKSlomskiSPartykaJ (2012)
The Dark Triad at work: how toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences52: 449–453.
66.
JudgeTA (2009)
Core self-evaluations and work success. Current Directions in Psychological Science18: 58–62.
67.
JudgeTAKammeyer-MuellerJD (2011)
Implications of core self-evaluations for a changing organizational context. Human Resource Management Review21: 331–341.
68.
JudgeTAErezABonoJE, et al. (2003)
The core self-evaluations scale: development of a measure. Personnel Psychology56: 303–331.
69.
JudgeTAHellerDKlingerR (2008)
The dispositional sources of job satisfaction: a comparative test. Applied Psychology: An International Review57: 361–372.
70.
JudgeTALockeEADurhamCC (1997)
The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: a core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior19: 151–188.
71.
JudgeTAPiccoloRFKosalkaT (2009)
The bright and dark sides of leader traits: a review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly20: 855–875.
72.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979)
Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263–291.
73.
Kets de VriesM (1990)
The organizational fool: balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations43: 751–770.
74.
KrollMJToombsLAWrightP (2000)
Napoleon’s tragic march home from Moscow: lessons in hubris. Academy of Management Perspectives14: 117–128.
75.
LawrenceDYPazzagliaFSonparK (2011)
The introduction of a non-traditional and aggressive approach to banking: the risks of hubris. Journal of Business Ethics102: 401–420.
76.
LeHSchmidtFLHarterJK, et al. (2010)
The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: an empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes112: 112–125.
77.
LeHSchmidtFLPutkaDJ (2009)
The multifaceted nature of measurement artifacts and its implications for estimating construct-level relationships. Organizational Research Methods12: 165–200.
78.
LewellynKBMuller-KahleMI (2012)
CEO power and risk taking: evidence from the subprime lending industry. Corporate Governance: An International Review20: 289–307.
79.
LiJTTangY (2010)
CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal53: 45–68.
80.
LiJTTangY (2013)
The social influence of executive hubris: cross-cultural comparison and indigenous factors. Management International Review53: 83–107.
81.
LubitR (2002)
The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers. Academy of Management Perspectives16: 127–138.
82.
MalmendierUTateG (2005a)
CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance60: 2661–2700.
83.
MalmendierUTateG (2005b)
Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management11: 649–659.
84.
MalmendierUTateG (2008)
Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics89: 20–43.
85.
MauleAJHodgkinsonGP (2003)
Re-appraising managers’ perceptual errors: a behavioural decision-making perspective. British Journal of Management14: 33–37.
86.
McAdamsDPPalsJL (2006)
A new Big Five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American Psychologist61: 204–217.
87.
McNultyTNordbergD (2016)
Ownership, activism and engagement: institutional investors as active owners. Corporate Governance: An International Review24: 346–358.
88.
MeziasJMStarbuckWH (2003)
Studying the accuracy of managers’ perceptions: a research odyssey. British Journal of Management14: 3–17.
89.
MishinaYDykesBJBlockES, et al. (2010)
Why “good” firms do bad things: the effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal53: 701–722.
90.
NogataDUchidaKGotoN (2011)
Is corporate governance important for regulated firms’ shareholders? Evidence from Japanese mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business63: 46–68.
91.
OwenD (2016) Hubris Syndrome. Enterprise Risk.
London:
Institute of Risk Management, pp.20–24.
92.
OwenDDavidsonJ (2009)
Hubris syndrome: an acquired personality disorder. A study of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers over the last 100 years. Brain : a Journal of Neurology132: 1396–1406.
93.
PadillaAHoganRKaiserRB (2007)
The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly18: 176–194.
94.
PetersonSJGalvinBMLangeD (2012)
CEO servant leadership: exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology65: 565–596.
95.
PetitVBollaertH (2012)
Flying too close to the sun? Hubris among CEOs and how to prevent it. Journal of Business Ethics108: 265–283.
96.
PiconePMDagninoGBMinaA (2014)
The origin of failure: a multidisciplinary appraisal of the hubris hypothesis and proposed research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives28: 447–468.
97.
PincusALLukowitskyMR (2010)
Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology6: 421–446.
98.
PirsonMTurnbullS (2011)
Corporate governance, risk management, and the financial crisis: an information processing view. Corporate Governance: An International Review19: 459–470.
99.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2016)
Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences. Organizational Research Methods19: 159–203.
RajMForsythM (2003)
Hubris amongst UK bidders and losses to shareholders. International Journal of Business8: 1–16.
102.
RehbeinKLogsdonJMVan BurenHJ (2013)
Corporate responses to shareholder activists: considering the dialogue alternative. Journal of Business Ethics112: 137–154.
103.
ResickCJWhitmanDSWeingardenSA, et al. (2009)
The bright-side and the dark-side of CEO personality: examining core self-evaluations, narcissism, transformational leadership, and strategic influence. Journal of Applied Psychology94: 1365–1381.
104.
RijsenbiltACommandeurH (2013)
Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics117: 413–429.
105.
RollR (1986)
The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journal of Business59: 197–216.
106.
RostKOsterlohM (2010)
Opening the black box of upper echelons: expertise and gender as drivers of poor information processing during the financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review18: 212–233.
107.
RusDvan KnippenbergDWisseB (2012)
Leader power and self-serving behavior: the moderating role of accountability. Leadership Quarterly23: 13–26.
108.
RussoEJSchoemakerPJH (1990) Decision Traps.
New York, NY:
Simon and Schuster.
109.
Sadler-SmithEAkstinaiteVRobinsonG, et al. (2017)
Hubristic leadership: a review. Leadership13: 525–548.
110.
ScheierMFCarverCSBridgesMW (1994)
Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67: 1063–1078.
111.
SchererAGRascheAPalazzoG, et al. (2016)
Managing for political corporate social responsibility: new challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies53: 273–298.
112.
SeeKEMorrisonEWRothmanNB, et al. (2011)
The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes116: 272–285.
113.
SethASongKPPettitRR (2000)
Synergy, managerialism or hubris? An empirical examination of motives for foreign acquisitions of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies31: 387–405.
114.
SethASongKPPettitRR (2002)
Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: an empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of US firms. Strategic Management Journal23: 921–940.
115.
ShefrinH (2002) Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
116.
ShipmanASMumfordMD (2011)
When confidence is detrimental: influence of overconfidence on leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly22: 649–665.
117.
ShuP-GYehY-HChiangT-L, et al. (2013)
Managerial overconfidence and share repurchases. International Review of Finance13: 39–65.
118.
SimonMShraderRC (2012)
Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: the role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions. Journal of Business Venturing27: 291–309.
119.
StanovichKEWestRF (2000)
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences23: 645–665.
120.
StumppTMuckPMHulshegerUR, et al. (2010)
Core self-evaluations in Germany: validation of a German measure and its relationships with career success. Applied Psychology59: 674–700.
121.
SuddabyR (2010)
Editor’s comments: construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review35: 346–357.
122.
TangYLiJTYangHY (2015a)
What I see, what I do: how executive hubris affects firm innovation. Journal of Management41: 1698–1723.
123.
TangYQianCLChenGL, et al. (2015b)
How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility? Strategic Management Journal36: 1338–1357.
124.
ThoroughgoodCNSawyerKBPadillaA, et al. (2018)
Destructive leadership: a critique of leader-centric perspectives and toward a more holistic definition. Journal of Business Ethics151: 627–649.
125.
TracyJLRobinsRW (2007)
The psychological structure of pride: a tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology92: 506–525.
126.
TrevelyanR (2008)
Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity. Management Decision46: 986–1001.
VecchioRP (2003)
Entrepreneurship and leadership: common trends and common threads. Human Resource Management Review13: 303–327.
129.
WangLHinrichsKTPrietoL, et al. (2010)
The effect of followers’ behavior on leader efficacy. Journal of Business and Management16: 139–151.
130.
WickhamPA (2006)
Overconfidence in new start-up success probability judgment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research12: 210–227.
131.
WrightBEChristensenRKPandeySK (2013)
Measuring public service motivation: exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal16: 197–223.
132.
ZahraSASapienzaHJDavidssonP (2006)
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies43: 917–955.
133.
ZhangTSabherwalSJayaramanN, et al. (2016)
The young and the restless: a study of age and acquisition propensity of CEOs of UK firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting43: 1385–1419.
134.
ZhuDH (2013)
Group polarization on corporate boards: theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums. Strategic Management Journal34: 800–822.
135.
ZhuDHChenGL (2015)
Narcissism, director selection, and risk-taking spending. Strategic Management Journal36: 2075–2098.
