The 2016 US Presidential Campaign was followed worldwide due to the dynamic nature of the candidates and the controversy surrounding them. This study takes a unique look at the candidacy of Donald Trump through the eyes of his followers. Using both qualitative data collected from campaign speeches and quantitative data collected from followers, our study examines (1) the positive/negative valence of the rhetoric used by both presidential candidates and (2) the relationship between follower characteristics, perceived threat of social groups, and attributions of charisma and effectiveness to Donald Trump. The results of this study suggest that Trump’s rhetoric was significantly more negative, hostile, and aggressive than Clinton’s. In addition, quantitative analyses show a direct relationship between followers’ attitudes toward gender and attributions of charisma and effectiveness to Trump. Finally, followers’ perceived threat of social groups mediated relationships between follower self-esteem, romance of leadership, gender attitudes, and attributions of charisma and effectiveness to Trump. Our results shed further light on the important role that follower characteristics and perceptions play in predicting social constructions of leadership and attributions of charisma. Implications for both organizations and scholars of leadership are discussed.
AhmadianSAzarshahiSPaulhusDL (2017)
Explaining Donald Trump via communication style: Grandiosity, informality, and dynamism. Personality and Individual Differences107: 49–53.
2.
AltemeyerB (1998)
The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology30: 47–92.
3.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988)
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411.
4.
AshkanasyNMDasboroughMT (2003)
Emotional awareness and emotional intelligence in leadership teaching. Journal of Education for Business79(1): 18–22.
5.
AshmoreRDDel BocaFKBilderSM (1995)
Construction and validation of the Gender Attitude Inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles32(11–12): 753–785.
6.
AvolioBJBassBMJungDI (1999)
Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology72(4): 441–462.
7.
AwamlehRGardnerWL (1999)
Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly10: 345–373.
8.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986)
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173.
9.
Baumeister RF (1997) Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of General Psychology 1(2): 145.
10.
BassBAvolioB (1995) MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, Ca: Mind Garden.
BlighMCKohlesJCMeindlJR (2004)
Charisma under crisis: Presidential leadership, rhetoric, and media responses before and after the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Leadership Quarterly15(2): 211–239.
13.
BlighMCKohlesJCPillaiR (2005)
Crisis and charisma in the California recall election. Leadership1(3): 323–352.
14.
BlighMCRobinsonJL (2010)
Was Gandhi “Charismatic”? Exploring the rhetorical leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. The Leadership Quarterly21: 844–855.
15.
BoalKBBrysonJM (1988) Charismatic Leadership: A Phenomenological and Structural Approach. In: Hunt JG, Baliga BR, Dachler HP and Schriesheim CA (eds) International leadership symposia series. Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 11-28). Lexington, MA, England: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com
16.
Boin A, Hart PT, McConnell A, et al. (2010) Leadership style, crisis response and blame management: The case of Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration 88(3): 706–723.
17.
CampbellJD (1990)
Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(3): 538.
18.
CampbellJDTrapnellPDHeineSJet al. (1996)
Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(1): 141.
19.
CongerJA (1991)
Inspiring others: The language of leadership. Academy of Management Perspectives5(1): 31–45.
20.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1987)
Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review12: 637–647.
ConnollyWE (2017)
Trump, the working class, and fascist rhetoric. Theory & Event20: 23–37.
23.
CoombsWTHolladayS (1994) Speaking of visions and visions being spoken. Management Communication Quarterly 8(2): 165–189.
24.
CoxDLieneschRJonesR (2017) Beyond economics: fears of cultural displacement pushed the white working class to trump. PRRI, May, 9.
25.
DamenFVan KnippenbergDVan KnippenbergB (2008)
Leader affective displays and attributions of charisma: The role of arousal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology38(10): 2594–2614.
26.
DavisE (2017) Post-truth: Why We have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We can do about It.
London:
Little Brown Book.
27.
DavisKMGardnerWL (2012)
Charisma under crisis revisited: Presidential leadership, perceived leader effectiveness, and contextual influences. The Leadership Quarterly23(5): 918–933.
28.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002)
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573.
29.
EmrichCGBrowerHHFeldmanJMet al. (2001)
Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Administrative Science Quarterly46(3): 527–557.
30.
FelfeJSchynsB (2006)
Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology36(3): 708–741.
31.
GabrielSParavatiEGreenMCet al. (2018) From apprentice to president: The role of parasocial connection in the election of Donald Trump. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 1948550617722835
32.
GalvinBMWaldmanDABalthazardP (2010)
Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology63(3): 509–537.
33.
GardnerWLAvolioBJ (1998)
The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review23(1): 32–58.
34.
Goldhill O (2017) The world is relying on a flawed psychological test to fight racism. Web blog post Retrieved October 23rd.
35.
Halverson SK, Holladay CL, Kazama SM, et al. (2004) Self-sacrificial behavior in crisis situations: The competing roles of behavioral and situational factors. The Leadership Quarterly 15(2): 263–275.
36.
Hamblin RL (1958) Leadership and crises. Sociometry 21(4): 322–335.
37.
HarmsPDWoodDLandayKet al. (2017) Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly 29(1): 105–122.
38.
HartRP (1984) Verbal Style and the Presidency: A Computer-based Analysis.
Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.
39.
HartRP (1987) The Sound of Leadership: Presidential Communication in the Modern Age.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
HartRP (2000b) Campaign Talk: Why Elections are Good for Us.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
42.
HartRP (2001) Redeveloping DICTION: Theoretical considerations. In: WestM (ed.) Theory, Method, and Practice of Computer Content Analysis.
New York, NY:
Ablex, pp.26–55.
43.
HatfieldECacioppoJTRapsonRL (1993)
Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science2(3): 96–100.
44.
HelgesonVSPalladinoDK (2012)
Agentic and communal traits and health: Adolescents with and without diabetes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38(4): 415–428.
45.
HoggMAvan KnippenbergDRastDE, III (2012)
The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology23(1): 258–304.
46.
Holladay SJ and Coombs WT (1993) Communicating visions: An exploration of the role of delivery in the creation of leader charisma. Management Communication Quarterly 6(4): 405–427.
47.
HowellJMShamirB (2005)
The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review30(1): 96–112.
48.
ItkowitzC (2016) This election has divided the country. Getting Clinton and Trump voters talking is one way to heal. The Washington Post, 14 November. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ (accessed 24 April 2018).
49.
JudgeTAErezABonoJEet al. (2002)
Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(3): 693.
50.
Kark R, Shamir B and Chen G (2003) The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of applied psychology 88(2): 246–255.
51.
KathleneL (1989)
Uncovering the political impacts of gender: An exploratory study. Western Political Quarterly42(2): 397–421.
52.
KluckhohnC (1951) Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In Parsons T and Shils E (eds) Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
LadkinDM (2017) How did that happen? Making sense of the 2016 US presidential election through the lens of the leadership moment. Leadership 13(4): 313–412.
54.
LockeKD (2003)
Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(3): 619.
55.
MeindlJR (1990)
On leadership-an alternative to the conventional wisdom. Research in Organizational Behavior12: 159–203.
56.
MeindlJR (1995)
The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly6(3): 329–341.
57.
MeindlJREhrlichSB (1987)
The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal30(1): 91–109.
58.
MeindlJREhrlichSB (1988)
Developing a Romance of Leadership Scale. Proceedings of the Eastern Academy of Management30: 133–135.
59.
MeindlJREhrlichSBDukerichJM (1985)
The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly30: 78–102.
60.
NeuendorfKA (2017) The Content Analysis Guidebook. 2nd ed.
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
61.
PastorJCMayoMShamirB (2007)
Adding fuel to fire: the impact of followers' arousal on ratings of charisma. Journal of Applied Psychology92(6): 1584.
62.
PillaiRMeindlJR (1998)
Context and charisma: A “meso” level examination of the relationship of organic structure, collectivism, and crisis to charismatic leadership. Journal of Management24(5): 643–671.
63.
Popper M and Mayseless O (2007) The building blocks of leader development: A psychological conceptual framework. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28(7): 664–684.
64.
Preacher KJ and Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods 40(3): 879–891.
65.
QuillianL (1995)
Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review 60(4): 586–611.
66.
RichardsonHASimmeringMJSturmanMC (2009)
A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods12(4): 762–800.
67.
RuckerDDPreacherKJTormalaZLet al. (2011)
Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass5(6): 359–371.
68.
SchildkrautDJ (2018)
Young people in the American electorate. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics1: 4.
69.
SchwartzSHBilskyW (1987)
Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53(3): 550.
70.
SchynsBFelfeJBlankH (2007)
Is charisma hyper-romanticism? Empirical evidence from new data and a meta-analysis. Applied Psychology56(4): 505–527.
71.
Shamir B, House RJ and Arthur MB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization science 4(4): 577–594.
72.
Shamir B (1995) Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly 6(1): 19–47.
73.
ShortJCPalmerTB (2008)
The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods11: 727–752.
74.
Steinmetz K (2017) The dictionary is adding an entry for ‘fake news.’ Time Magazine Online, September 27, 2017.
75.
SydserffRWeetmanP (2002)
Developments in content analysis: A transitivity index and DICTION scores. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal15(4): 523–545.
76.
TeeEYPaulsenNAshkanasyNM (2013)
Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: The role of collective follower emotion and action. The Leadership Quarterly24(6): 902–918.
77.
Thoroughgood CN, Padilla A, Hunter ST, et al. (2012) The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 23(5): 897–917.
78.
TrapnellPDPaulhusDL (2012)
Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment94(1): 39–52.
79.
Uhl-Bien M and Pillai R (2007) The romance of leadership and the social construction of followership. In: Shamir B, Pillai R, Bligh MC and Uhl-Bien M (eds) Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 187–210.
WangYLuoJNiemiRet al. (2016) Catching fire via “Likes”: Inferring topic preferences of Trump followers on Twitter. Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2016), pp.719–722. May 17-20, 2016, Cologne Germany
82.
WeberM (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Henderson AM and Parsons T, Trans.).
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
83.
WhiskerD (2012)
Apocalyptic rhetoric on the American religious right: Quasi-charisma and anti-charisma. Max Weber Studies12: 159–184.
84.
WilliamsEAPillaiRDeptulaBet al. (2012)
The effects of crisis, cynicism about change, and value congruence on perceptions of authentic leadership and attributed charisma in the 2008 presidential election. The Leadership Quarterly23(3): 324–341.
85.
WilliamsEAPillaiRLoweKBet al. (2009)
Crisis, charisma, values, and voting behavior in the 2004 presidential election. The Leadership Quarterly20: 70–86.
86.
Wojciszke B, Baryla W, Parzuchowski M, et al. (2011) Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology 41(5): 617–627.
87.
YagilD (1998)
Charismatic leadership and organizational hierarchy: Attribution of charisma to close and distant leaders. The Leadership Quarterly9(2): 161–176.
88.
Yukl G (1999) An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 8(1): 33–48.
89.
Yuthas K, Rogers R and Dillard JF (2002) Communicative action and corporate annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics 41(1–2): 141–157
90.
ZarefskyD (2004)
Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly34(3): 607–619.
