The most prominent theory in leadership studies is transformational leadership. Ironically, however, scholars who subscribe to transformational leadership have left the concept of transformation itself, unexamined and lying dormant in the background. In response to this neglect, I propose a Meadian framework of leadership that is centered on the nature of transformation in both leaders and leadership trans-actions. I present a framework that is Meadian, and not exclusively from Mead, by integrating contemporary scholarship from a range of disciplines that corroborate and complement Mead’s work and provides transformational leadership scholars a new way forward. I use Mead’s I/Me distinction to answer who transformational leaders are in their embodied social selves and Mead’s role-taking notion in the social act to answer what transformational leaders do in relation with followers. In doing so, I provide leadership scholars a “third way” between dichotomous conceptions of singularly influential leaders on the one hand and leaderless leadership processes on the other.
AlvessonMBridgmanTWillmottH (2009) Introduction. In: AlvessonMBridgmanTWillmottH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28.
2.
ArcherMS (2007) Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
3.
AthensL (2007)
Radical interactionism: going beyond Mead. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour37(2): 137–165.
4.
AthensL (2009)
The roots of “radical interactionism”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour39(4): 387–414.
5.
AthensL (2010)
Human subordination from a radical interactionist’s perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour40(3): 339–368.
6.
AvolioBJWalumbwaFOWeberTJ (2009)
Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology60: 421–449.
7.
BanksGCMcCauleyKDGardnerWL, et al. (2016)
A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly27(4): 634–652.
8.
BanksGCEngemannKNWilliamsCE, et al. (2017)
A meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 28(4): 508–529.
9.
BarresiJ (2012)
On seeing our selves and others as persons. New Ideas in Psychology30(1): 120–130.
10.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations.
New York:
Collier Macmillan.
11.
BassBMSteidlmeierP (1999)
Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly10(2): 181–217.
12.
BenzecryCE (2009)
Becoming a fan: On the seductions of opera. Qualitative Sociology32(2): 131–151.
13.
BickhardMH (2004) The social ontology of persons. In: CarpendaleJIMMullerU (eds) Social Interaction and the Development of Knowledge.
Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 111–132.
14.
BourdieuP (1987) Legitimation and Structured Interests in Weber’s Sociology of Religion. In: WhimsterSLashS (eds) Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity.
London:
Allen Unwin, pp. 119–136.
15.
BourdieuP (1991)
Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research13(1): 1–44.
16.
BourdieuPWacquantLJ (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
17.
BurnsJM (1978) Leadership, 1978.
New York:
Harper & Row.
18.
CalleroPL (2003)
The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology29(1): 115–133.
19.
CarriganMMA (2014) Becoming Who We Are: Personal Morphogenesis and Social Change. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Warwick, UK.
20.
CarrollBLevyLRichmondD (2008)
Leadership as practice: Challenging the competency paradigm. Leadership4(4): 363–379.
21.
CarrollBSimpsonB (2012)
Capturing sociality in the movement between frames: An illustration from leadership development. Human Relations65(10): 1283–1309.
22.
ColeMSBruchHShamirB (2009)
Social distance as a moderator of the effects of transformational leadership: Both neutralizer and enhancer. Human Relations62(11): 1697–1733.
23.
CollinsonD (2012)
Prozac leadership and the limits of positive thinking.Leadership8(2): 87–107.
24.
CornelissenS (2016)
Turning distaste into taste: Context-specific habitus and the practical congruity of culture. Theory and Society45(6): 501–529.
25.
CrevaniLLindgrenMPackendorffJ (2010)
Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management26(1): 77–86.
26.
CrevaniLEndrissatN (2016) Mapping the leadership-as-practice terrain. In: Raelin JA (ed)Leadership-as-Practice: Theory and Application. New York: Routledge, pp. 21–49.
27.
CuddyAJFiskeSTGlickP (2008)
Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology40: 61–149.
28.
Da SilvaFC (2007) GH Mead: A Critical Introduction.
Cambridge:
Polity.
29.
DanielJ (2016) Conscience as ecological participation and the maintenance of moral perplexity. In: The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p. 276.
30.
DinhJELordRGGardnerWL, et al. (2014)
Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly25(1): 36–62.
31.
DittrichKSeidlD (2017)
Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal 61(1): 111–138.
32.
EberlyMBJohnsonMDHernandezM, et al. (2013)
An integrative process model of leadership: Examining loci, mechanisms, and event cycles. American Psychologist68(6): 427.
33.
ElkjaerBSimpsonB (2011) Pragmatism: A lived and living philosophy. What can it offer to contemporary organization theory? In: Philosophy and Organization Theory. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 55–84.
34.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998)
What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023.
35.
EriksonEH (1968) Identity: Youth and Crisis.
New York:
Norton.
36.
FisherKRobbinsCR (2015)
Embodied leadership: Moving from leader competencies to leaderful practices. Leadership11(3): 281–299.
37.
FletcherJK (2004)
The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly15(5): 647–661.
38.
FarjounMAnsellCBoinA (2015)
PERSPECTIVE—Pragmatism in organization studies: Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and complex world. Organization Science26(6): 1787–1804.
39.
FontrodonaJ (2002) Pragmatism and Management Inquiry: Insights from the Thought of Charles S. Peirce.
Westport, CN:
Greenwood Publishing Group.
40.
FrankDJMeyerJW (2002)
The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory20(1): 86–105.
41.
GalvinBMBalkundiPWaldmanDA (2010)
Spreading the word: The role of surrogates in charismatic leadership processes. Academy of Management Review35(3): 477–494.
42.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.
Palo Alto, CA:
Stanford University Press.
43.
GillespieA (2005)
GH Mead: Theorist of the social act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour35(1): 19–39.
44.
GillespieARichardsonB (2011)
Exchanging social positions: Enhancing perspective taking within a cooperative problem solving task. European Journal of Social Psychology41(5): 608–616.
45.
GillespieA (2012)
Position exchange: The social development of agency. New Ideas in Psychology30(1): 32–46.
46.
GillespieAMartinJ (2014)
Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology32: 73–79.
47.
GroszE (2011) Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
48.
GuignonC (2012)
Becoming a person: Hermeneutic phenomenology’s contribution. New Ideas in Psychology30(1): 97–106.
49.
HermansHJ (2002)
The dialogical self as a society of mind: Introduction. Theory & Psychology12(2): 147–160.
50.
HermansHJ (2012)
Dialogical Self Theory and the increasing multiplicity of I-positions in a globalizing society: An introduction. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development2012(137): 1–21.
51.
HorowitzMCStamACEllisCM (2015) Why Leaders Fight.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
52.
HoggMA (2001)
A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review5(3): 184–200.
53.
IngoldTPalssonG (2013) Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
54.
JoasHHuebnerDR (2016) The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
55.
KüpersWM (2013)
Embodied inter-practices of leadership–Phenomenological perspectives on relational and responsive leading and following. Leadership9(3): 335–357.
56.
ManneK (2016)
Humanism: A critique. Social Theory and Practice42: 389–415.
57.
MartinJ (2005)
Perspectival selves in interaction with others: Re-reading GH Mead's Social Psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour35(3): 231–253.
58.
MartinJSokolBWElfersT (2008)
Taking and coordinating perspectives: From prereflective interactivity, through reflective intersubjectivity, to metareflective sociality. Human Development51(5–6): 294–317.
59.
MartinJGillespieA (2010)
A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science44(3): 252–272.
60.
McCloudSP (2012)
The possibilities of change in a world of constraint: Individual and social transformation in the work of Pierre Bourdieu. Bulletin for the Study of Religion41(1): 2–8.
61.
MeadGH (1932) The philosophy of the present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
62.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, Self and Society (
Vol.111).
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
63.
MeadGH (1938) The philosophy of the act. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
MeadGH (1964) On social psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
MeindlJREhrlichSBDukerichJM (1985)
The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly30: 78–102.
66.
MeloniMWilliamsSJMartinPA (2016) Biosocial Matters: Rethinking Sociology-Biology Relations in the Twenty-First Century.
New York:
John Wiley.
67.
NungesserF (2016) Mead meets Tomasello: Pragmatism, the cognitive sciences, and the origins of human communication and sociality. In: Joas H and Huebner D R (eds) The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 252-275.
68.
ParmarBLPhillipsRFreemanRE (2016)
Pragmatism and organization studies. In: MirRWillmottHGreenwoodM (eds) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies.
London:
Taylor and Francis, pp. 199–211.
PizzatoM (2006) Ghosts of Theatre and Cinema in the Brain.
New York:
Springer.
71.
PopperMMayselessO (2003)
Back to basics: Applying a parenting perspective to transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly14(1): 41–65.
72.
PriceTL (2003)
The ethics of authentic transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly14(1): 67–81.
73.
ProiettoRJamesNP (1996)
Socrates: A sociological understanding of the production of an outcast. Economy and Society25(1): 1–35.
74.
RaelinJ (2011)
From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership7(2): 195–211.
75.
RaelinJA (2016)
Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership12(2): 131–158.
76.
RaelinJA. (2016) Leadership-as-Practice: Theory and Application.
London:
Routledge.
77.
RafieianSDavisH (2016)
Dissociation, reflexivity and habitus. European Journal of Social Theory19(4): 556–573.
78.
RaffertyAEGriffinMA (2004)
Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly15(3): 329–354.
79.
RothWMBowenGM (2001)
Of disciplined minds and disciplined bodies: On becoming an ecologist. Qualitative Sociology24(4): 459–481.
80.
RothenbergMA (2010) The Excessive Subject: A New Theory of Social Change.
Cambridge:
Polity.
81.
SennettR (1993) Authority.
New York:
WW Norton & Company.
82.
SimpsonB (2009)
Pragmatism, Mead and the practice turn. Organization Studies30(12): 1329–1347.
83.
SimpsonB (2014) George Herbert Mead (1863-1931). In: Helin J, Hernes T, Hjorth D and Holt R (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 272–286.
84.
SimpsonB (2016) Where’s the Agency in Leadership-as-Practice?
New York/London:
Routledge.
85.
SimpsonBBuchanLSillinceJ (2017)
The performativity of leadership talk. Leadership. Epub ahead of print 05 June 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1742715017710591
86.
SullivanS (2001) Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism, and Feminism.
Bloomington, IN:
Indiana University Press.
87.
TavoryIEliasophN (2013)
Coordinating futures: Toward a theory of anticipation 1. American Journal of Sociology118(4): 908–942.
88.
ThomasML (2016) Mead, Whitehead, and the sociality of nature. In: Joas H and Huebner DR (eds) The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p. 185.
89.
TomaselloM (2009) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
90.
TourishD (2013)
The dark side of transformational leadership: A critical perspective. Routledge.
91.
TourishD (2014)
Leadership, more or less? A processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership10(1): 79–98.
TurnerVW (1982) From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play.
Boston, MA:
PAJ Publications.
94.
Uhl-BienM (2006)
Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly17(6): 654–676.
95.
Van KnippenbergD (2011)
Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly22(6): 1078–1091.
96.
Van KnippenbergDSitkinSB (2013)
A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals7(1): 1–60.
97.
WacquantL (2004) Body & Soul.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
98.
WacquantL (2005)
Carnal connections: On embodiment, apprenticeship, and membership. Qualitative Sociology28(4): 445–474.
99.
WickertCSchaeferSM (2015)
Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations68(1): 107–130.
100.
WoodMDibbenM (2015)
Leadership as relational process. Process Studies44(1): 24–47.
