Relational leadership theory views leadership as a process of social construction in which participants engage through their bodily presence. The ‘in-between’ space connecting leaders and followers, however, is under-researched and has not been analysed with a focus on movement. With a phenomenological approach and dance theory, this study explores movement by considering techno DJs and their live performances to an audience in clubs. It analyses DJs’ insights into relationships between themselves and followers. DJs actively seek physical proximity and use bodily movement and kinaesthetic empathy to relate to the participants, engage in mutual challenge, and embrace the co-creation that emerges. These insights are transferable to many leadership situations that include embodied interaction. The study illustrates that leaders not only ‘have’ bodies, but ‘are’ (moving) bodies who achieve a profound appreciation of the situation. This changes how we conceive of leadership when agency in embodied interaction is conditioned and reciprocated by leaders and followers in the ‘in-between’ space and does not pertain to one or the other.
AdlerN (2010)
Going beyond the dehydrated language of management: Leadership insight. Journal of Business Strategy31(4): 90–99.
2.
AttiasBGavanasARietveld H (eds) (2013) DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and Social Change in Electronic Dance Music.
London:
Bloomsbury.
3.
BathurstRCainT (2013)
Embodied leadership: The aesthetics of gesture. Leadership9(3): 358–377.
4.
BiehlB (2017) Dance and Organisation. Integrating Dance Theory and Methods into the Study of Management.
New York:
Routledge.
5.
Biehl-MissalB (2010)
Hero takes a fall: A lesson from theatre for leadership. Leadership6(3): 279–294.
6.
Biehl-MissalB (2011)
Business is show business. Management presentations as performance. Journal of Management Studies48(3): 619–645.
7.
Biehl-MissalB (2015)
Let me entertain you? Some reflexions on the professor as a DJ. Organizational Aesthetics4(1): 4–8.
8.
Biehl-MissalB (2016)
Filling the ‘empty space’: Site-specific dance in a techno club. Culture and Organisation. 12 July 2016. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.1080/14759551.2016.1206547.
9.
Biehl-MissalBSpringborgC (eds) (2016) Dance, choreography and organisation. Special issue. Organizational Aesthetics 5(1): 1–187.
D’AndreaA (2004) Global nomads. Techno and new ages as transnational countercultures in Ibiza and Goa. In: St JohnG (ed) Rave Culture and Religion.
London:
Routledge, pp.236–255.
15.
DegotV (1987)
Portrait of the manager as an artist. Dragon: The Journal of SCOS2(4): 13–50.
16.
DesmondJ (ed) (1997) Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance (Post-Contemporary Interventions).
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
EllisCAdamsTBochnerA (2011)
Autoethnography: An overview. FQS, Forum: Qualitative Social Research12(1): Art. 10.
19.
Fairhurst G and Uhl-Bien M (2012) Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6):1043–1062.
20.
FelsteadAFullerAJewsonNet al. (2007)
Grooving to the same tunes? Learning, training and productive systems in the aerobics studio. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 189–208.
21.
Fischer-LichteE (2004) Die Wiederverzauberung der Welt. Eine Nachbemerkung zum Begriff des postdramatischen Theaters. [Re-enchantement of the world. A comment on postdramatic theatre] In: PrimavesiPSchmittOA (eds) AufBrüche. Theaterarbeit zwischen Text und Situation. [Theatre Work Between Text and Situation].
Berlin:
Theater der Zeit, pp.36–44.
22.
Fischer-LichteE (2005) Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual. Exploring Forms of Political Theatre.
London:
Routledge.
23.
Fischer-LichteE (2008) The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics.
New York:
Routledge.
24.
FosterSL (2011) Choreographing Empathy. Kinesthesia in Performance.
London and New York:
Routledge.
25.
FosterSL (2013) Dancing and theorizing and theorizing dancing. In: BrandstetterGKleinG (eds) Dance (and) Theory.
Bielefeld:
transcript, pp.19–32.
26.
GardnerWLAvolioBJ (1998)
The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review23(1): 32–58.
GerardM (2004) Selecting ritual: DJs, dancers and liminality in underground dance music. In: St JohnG (ed) Rave Culture and Religion.
London:
Routledge, pp.167–184.
29.
GillingD (2014) From Mahler to the movies: Physical empathy in orchestral leadership. In: LadkinDTaylor S (eds) The Physicality of Leadership: Gesture, Entanglement, Taboo, Possibilities.
Bingley:
Emerald, pp.109–134.
30.
GouldingCShankarAElliottRet al. (2009)
The marketplace management of illicit pleasure. Journal of Consumer Research35(5): 759–771.
HarveyA (2001)
A dramaturgical analysis of charismatic leader discourse. Journal of Organizational Change Management14(3): 253–265.
33.
HoskingD (2007) Not leaders, not followers: A post-modern discourse of leadership processes. In ShamirBPillaiRBlightM (eds) Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R Meindl.
Greenwich, CT:
Information Age Publishing, pp.167–186.
34.
HujalaALaulainenSKokkonenKet al. (2016)
Dancing with the bosses: Creative movement as a method. Organizational Aesthetics5(1): 11–36.
35.
KleinG (2004) Electronic Vibration. Pop Kultur Theorie.
Wiesbaden:
VS Verlag.
36.
KoivunenN (2006) Auditive leadership culture. Lessons from symphony orchestras. In: HoskingD MMcNamee S (eds) The Social Construction of Organization.
Copenhagen:
Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, pp.91–111.
37.
KoivunenNWennesG (2011)
Show us the sound! Aesthetic leadership of symphony orchestra conductors. Leadership7(1): 51–71.
38.
KüpersW (2013)
Embodied inter-practices of leadership – Phenomenological perspectives on relational and responsive leading and following. Leadership9(3): 335–357.
39.
KüpersW (2014) To be physical is to ‘inter-be-come’. Beyond empiricism and idealism towards embodied leadership that matters. In: LadkinDTaylor S (eds) Physicality of Leadership, Gesture, Entanglement, Taboo, Possibilities.
London:
Emerald, pp.83–108.
40.
LadkinD (2010) Rethinking Leadership: A New Look at Old Leadership Questions.
Cheltenham:
Elgar.
41.
LadkinD (2013)
From perception to flesh: A phenomenological account of the felt experience of leadership. Leadership9(3): 320–334.
42.
LadkinD (2017) How did that happen? Making sense of the 2016 US presidential election result through the lens of the ‘leadership moment’. Leadership. 13(4): 393–412.
43.
LadkinDTaylorS (2010a)
Editorial: Special issue on leadership as art: Variations on a theme. Leadership6(3): 235–241.
44.
LadkinDTaylorS (2010b)
Enacting the ‘true self’: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. Leadership Quarterly21(1): 64–74.
45.
MavinSGrandyG (2016)
A theory of abject appearance: Women elite leaders’ intra-gender ‘management’ of bodies and appearance. Human Relations69(5): 1095–1120.
46.
Merleau-PontyM (1962) The Phenomenology of Perception.
London:
Routledge.
47.
NebeA (2014)
Mit beats. Gala Men4: 55–61.
48.
ParviainenJ (2002)
Kinaesthetic empathy. Dialogue and Universalism13(11/12): 154–165.
49.
PaumgartenN (2014) Berlin nights. The thrall of techno. The New Yorker, 24 March, pp.64–73.
50.
PavisP (2003) Analyzing Performance, Theater, Dance, and Film.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
51.
PfadenhauerM (2009)
The lord of the loops. Observations at the club culture DJ-desk. Forum: Qualitative Social Research10(3): Art. 17.
52.
ReynoldsS (2013) Energy Flash. Revised ed.
London:
Faber and Faber.
53.
RiachKWarrenS (2015)
Smell organization: Bodies and corporeal porosity in office work. Human Relations68(5): 789–809.
54.
RietveldHC (2013) Journey to the light? Immersion, spectacle and mediation. In: AttiasBGavanasARietveld H (eds) DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and Social Change in Electronic Dance Music.
London:
Bloomsbury, pp.79–102.
55.
RodgersT (2010) Pink Noises: Women on Electronic Music and Sound.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
56.
RopoAParviainenJKoivunenN (2002) Aesthetics in leadership. From absent bodies to social bodily presence. In: ParryKWMeindlJR (eds) Grounding Leadership Theory and Research: Issues and Perspectives.
Greenwich, CT:
Information Age Publishing, pp.21–38.
57.
RopoASauerE (2008)
Dances of leadership: Bridging theory and practice through an aesthetic approach. Journal of Management & Organization14: 560–572.
58.
SnowberC (2012)
Dance as a way of knowing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education134: 53–60.
59.
SpringborgC (2010)
Leadership as art – Leaders coming to their senses. Leadership6(3): 243–258.
60.
TaylorS (2012) Leadership Art, Leadership Craft.
New York:
Palgrave MacMillan.
61.
TaylorSHansenH (2005)
Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1211–1231.
62.
TeipelJ (2013) Mehr Als Laut. DJs Erzählen.
Berlin:
Surkamp.
63.
TourishD (2014)
Leadership, more or less? A processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership10(1): 79–98.
64.
Uhl-BienM (2006)
Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. LeadershipQuarterly17(6): 654–676.
65.
Uhl-BienMRiggioRLoweKet al. (2014)
Followership theory: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly25(1): 83–104.
66.
WarrenS (2016) Fire and warmth: Bodies, music and space in the craft of underground DJing, paper and DJ performance. In: Art of management and organisation conference, Bled, Slovenia, 1–4 September.
