This paper examines how distributed leadership involving actor–object couplings may contribute to coordinated action across disparate thought worlds. We draw on ideas from French pragmatist sociology and on a case study of a successful collaborative research project involving participants from academia, government and practice settings to show how various kinds of objects (including material artifacts, more abstract concepts and human-material assemblages such as committees and procedures) come to participate in the leadership practices of multiple individuals, allowing the connection among different worlds. We suggest that adjustments between groups involved in collaborative work do not necessarily occur through the sharing of a common vision but through the ability of leaders to translate projects in terms that can be appreciated by the groups that must be mobilized. These translation activities are distributed widely between leaders and objects that co-construct each other. Objects frame action and give meaning to people, participating in the construction of leaders' roles.
AdlerNElmquistMNorrgrenF (2009) The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context. Research Policy38: 1136–1149.
2.
AmabileTMPattersonCMuellerJ (2001) Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal44: 418–431.
3.
AmblardHBernouxPHerrerosG (1996) Les Nouvelles Approches Sociologiques des Organisations, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
4.
AnnisetteMRichardsonAJ (2011) Justification and accounting: Applying sociology of worth to accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal24: 229–249.
5.
BarrettMObornE (2010) Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams. Human Relations63: 1199–1221.
6.
BartunekJMRynesSLDaftRL (2001) Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal44: 340–355.
7.
Beaudoin J and Mailhot C (2009) Mieux comprendre la gestion de l innovation : le cas d un centre de liaison et de transfert en sciences sociales au Québec. Management International, 13(special issue): 147–154.
8.
BechkyBA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science14: 312–330.
9.
BoldenR (2011) Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews13: 251–269.
10.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
BrysonJMCrosbyBCBrysonJK (2009) Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing: The contributions of actor-network theory. International Public Management Journal12: 172–207.
12.
BuchananDAAddicottRFitzgeraldL (2007) Nobody in charge: Distributed change agency in healthcare. Human Relations60: 1065–1090.
13.
CarlilePR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science13: 442–455.
14.
CarlilePR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science15: 555–568.
15.
ChreimSWilliamsBBJanzL (2010) Change agency in a primary health care context: The case of distributed leadership. Health Care Management Review35: 187–199.
16.
ColdrenAF (2007) Spanning the boundary between school leadership and classroom instruction at Hillside elementary school. In: SpillaneJPDiamondJB (eds) Distributed Leadership in Practice, New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, pp. 16–34.
17.
CollinsHEvansRGormanM (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A38: 657–666.
18.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism, Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
19.
CrosbyBCBrysonJM (2010) Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly21: 211–230.
20.
CurrieGLockettA (2011) Distributing leadership in health and social care: Concertive, conjoint or collective?International Journal of Management Reviews13: 286–300.
21.
DenisJ-LLangleyASergiV (2012) Leadership in the plural. Academy of Management Annals6: 211–283.
22.
DoughertyD (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science3: 179–202.
23.
EngeströmY (1987) Learning by Expanding. An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
24.
Ernø-KjølhedeEHustedKMønstedM (2001) Managing university research in the triple helix. Science and Public Policy28: 49–55.
25.
ErnstCYipJ (2009) Boundary spanning leadership: Tactics to bridge social identity groups in organizations. In: PittinskyTL (eds) Crossing the Divide: Intergroup Leadership in a World of Difference, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 87–100.
26.
EtzkowitzHLeydesdorffLA (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, London, UK: Pinter.
27.
FitzsimonsDJamesKTDenyerD (2011) Alternative approaches for studying shared and distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews13: 313–328.
28.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyH (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
GrayB (2008) Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine35: S124–S132.
30.
GronnP (2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly13: 423–451.
HalversonR (2007) How leaders use artifacts to structure professional community in schools. In: StollLLouisKS (eds) Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth, and Dilemmas, Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, pp. 93–105.
33.
HuxhamCVangenS (2000) Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal43: 1159–1175.
34.
JagdS (2011) Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory14: 343–359.
35.
KelloggKCOrlikowskiWJYatesJ (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science17: 22–44.
36.
KieserALeinerL (2009) Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies46: 516–533.
37.
Knorr-CetinaK (1997) Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory Culture and Society14: 1–30.
38.
Knorr-CetinaK (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
LadkinD (2010) Rethinking Leadership, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
40.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
LeeTWMitchellTRSablynskiCJ (1999) Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior55: 161–187.
42.
Livian,YF and Herreros, G (1994) Une nouvelle grille d'analyse des organisations? L'apport des économies de la grandeur, Revue française de gestion 101, November–December: 43–59.
43.
MartinGPCurrieGFinnR (2009) Leadership, service reform, and public-service networks: The case of cancer-genetics pilots in the English NHS. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19: 769–794.
44.
MesnyAMailhotC (2007) The difficult search for compromises in a Canadian industry/university research partnership. Canadian Journal of Sociology32: 203–227.
45.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
46.
MohrmanSAGibsonCBMohrmanAMJr (2001) Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal44: 357–375.
47.
MulcahyDPerilloS (2011) Thinking management and leadership within colleges and schools somewhat differently: A practice-based, actor-network theory perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership39: 122–145.
48.
NicoliniDMengisJSwanJ (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science23: 612–629.
49.
ObornEBarrettMDawsonS (2013) Distributed leadership in policy formulation: A sociomaterial perspective. Organization Studies34: 253–276.
50.
PatriottaGGondJPSchultzF (2011) Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies48: 1804–1836.
51.
PearceCLCongerJA (2003) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52.
PettigrewAM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science1: 267–292.
53.
PittinskyTL (2009) Crossing the Divide: Intergroup Leadership in a World of Difference, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
54.
ReineckeJ (2010) Beyond a subjective theory of value and towards a ‘fair price’: An organizational perspective on Fairtrade minimum price setting. Organization17: 563–581.
55.
SilberIF (2003) Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology beyond repertoire theory?European Journal of Social Theory6: 427–449.
56.
SpillaneJP (2006) Distributed Leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57.
SpillaneJPColdrenAF (2011) Diagnosis and Design for School Improvement: Using a Distributed Perspective to Lead and Manage Change, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58.
SpillaneJPDiamondJB (2007) Distributed Leadership in Practice, New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
59.
SpillaneJPHalversonRDiamondJB (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies36: 3–34.
60.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
61.
ThorntonPHOcasioWLounsburyM (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62.
ZhangJFaermanSR (2007) Distributed leadership in the development of a knowledge sharing system. European Journal of Information Systems16: 479–493.
