The present study aims to explore positive and negative leadership behaviours (i.e. transformational and non-transformational leadership) in a non-Western ‘change and transformation’ context through qualitative methods. Thirty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with knowledge workers in Turkey. In addition to the original dimensions found in the literature, four categories of transformational leadership emerged: benevolent paternalism, implementation of the vision, employee participation and teamwork, and proactive behaviour. Among these categories, benevolent paternalism was identified to be the most frequently mentioned aspect of transformational leadership in the Turkish context, which implies that cultural context may influence the form and enactment of transformational leadership. Regarding non-transformational leadership, five categories emerged: destructive, closed, passive/ineffective, active-failed and a miscellaneous category. Among these, destructive leadership that includes authoritarian elements was identified as the most frequently mentioned form of non-transformational leadership. These findings imply that non-transformational leadership comes in many forms, supporting the numerous constructs on the destructive/unethical–ineffective/incompetent continuum found in the negative leadership literature. The findings are discussed with reference to the literature and to social change in Turkey.
AaslandMSSkogstadANotelaersGNielsenMBEinarsenS (2010) The prevalence of destructive leadership behavior. British Journal of Management21: 1467–8551.
2.
AntonakisJHouseRJ(2002) An analysis of the full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In: AvolioBJYammarinoFJ (eds) Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead: 3–33, Amsterdam: JAI Press.
3.
AycanZ (2001) Human resource management in Turkey: Current issues and future challenges. International Journal of Manpower22(3): 252–260.
4.
AycanZ(2006) Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In: KimUYangKHwangKK (eds) Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context, New York: Springer, pp. 445–466.
5.
AycanZKanungoRNMendonceMKaichengYDellerJ (2000) Impact of culture on human resource practices: A 10 country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review49(1): 192–221.
6.
Bass BM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: The Free Press.
7.
BassBM (1990) Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, New York: The Free Press.
8.
BassBM (1995) Transformational Leadership. Journal of Management Inquiry4(3): 293–298.
9.
BassBM (1998) Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military and Educational Impact, London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
BassBMAvolioBJ (1995) MLQ: Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, 2nd edn, Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
11.
BassBMRiggioRE (2006) Transformational Leadership, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
BerkmanÜÖzenŞ(2007) Turkish business system and managerial culture: State dependency and paternalism in transition. In: DavelEDupuisJPChanlatJF (eds) Culture and Management in the Contemporary World, Quebec: Laval University (CD-rom).
13.
BradburnNM (1963) Interpersonal relations within formal organizations in Turkey. Journal of Social Issues31: 61–67.
14.
Chen XP, Eberly MB, Chiang TJ, Farh JL and Cheng BS (in press) Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management.
15.
ChengBChouLWuTHuangMFarhJ (2004) Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology7: 89–117.
16.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1998) Charismatic Leadership in Organizations, London: Sage.
17.
CraigSBGustafsonSB (1998) Perceived leader integrity scale: An instrument for assessing employee perceptions of leader integrity. Leadership Quarterly9: 127–145.
18.
Den HartogDNHouseRJHangesPJRuiz-QuintanillaSADorfmanPWGLOBEAssociates (1999) Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?Leadership Quarterly10(2): 219–256.
19.
DruckerPF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review41: 79–94.
20.
ErbenGSGüneş erAB (2008) The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics82: 955–968.
21.
EinarsenSAaslandMSSkogstadA (2007) Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly18(3): 207–216.
22.
FarhJLChengBS(2000) A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In: LiJTTsuiASWeldonE (eds) Management and Organizations in the Chinese context, London: MacMillan, pp. 84–127.
23.
FerrisGRZinkoRBrouerRLBuckleyMRHarveyMG (2007) Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership. Leadership Quarterly18: 195–206.
24.
FrostPJ (2004) Handling toxic emotions: New challenges for leaders and their organization. Organizational Dynamics33: 111–127.
25.
GaskellG(2000) Individual and group interviewing. In: BauerMWGaskellG (eds) Qualitative Researching: With Text, Image and Sound, London: Sage, pp. 38–56.
26.
GriffinRWO’Leary-KellyAM (2004) The Dark Side of Organizational Behavior, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
HollensbeECKhazanchiSMastersonSS (2008) How do I assess if my supervisor and organization are fair? Identifying the rules underlying entity-based justice perceptions. Academy of Management51(6): 1099–1116.
28.
HowellJMAvolioBJ (1992) The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation?Academy of Management Executive6: 43–54.
29.
Hughes R, Ginnettt R and Curphy G (2009) Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. McGraw-Hill.
30.
ImamoğluEOKarakitapoğlu-AygünZ (2004) Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs130(4): 277–306.
31.
KabasakalHBodurM (2002) Arabic Cluster: A bridge between East and West. Journal of World Business37: 40–54.
32.
Karakitapoğlu-AygünZ (2004) Self, identity and emotional well-being among Turkish university students. The Journal of Psychology138: 457–478.
33.
Karakitapoğlu-Aygün Z and Gumusluoglu L (2012). A Re-Conceptualization of Transformational Leadership in the Turkish Context. Unpublished manuscript, Bilkent University, Ankara.
34.
KellerRT (1992) Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management18(3): 489–501.
35.
KellermanB (2004) Bad Leadership: What it Is, How it Happens, Why it Matters, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36.
KirbyPCParadiseLVKingMI (1992) Extraordinary leaders in education: Understanding transformational leadership. Journal of Educational Research85: 303–311.
37.
Liu D, Liao H and Loi R (in press) The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal.
38.
LoweKBKroeckGKSivasubramaniamN (1996) Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly7(3): 385–425.
39.
LuthansFPetersonSJIbrayevaE (1998) The potential for the ‘dark side’ of leadership in post-communist countries. Journal of World Business33: 185–201.
40.
McClelland DC and Burnham DH (2003) Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, Jan 117–126.
41.
PadillaAHoganRKaiserR (2007) The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers and conducive environments. Leadership Quarterly18: 176–194.
42.
Paş aSFKabasakalHBodurM (2001) Society, organizations and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review50(4): 559–589.
43.
PellegriniEKScanduraTA (2006) Leader-member exchange (LMX), paternalism and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies37: 264–279.
44.
PellegriniEScanduraTA (2008) Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management4(3): 566–593.
45.
PellegriniEKScanduraTAJayaramanV (2010) Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of Leader-Member Exchange theory. Group & Organization Management35(4): 391–420.
46.
PodsakoffPM. MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH and Fetter R (1990) Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leaders, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly1: 107–142.
47.
SchaubroeckJWalumbaFOGansterDCKepesS (2007) Destructive leader traits and neutralizing influence of an enriched job. Leadership Quarterly18: 236–251.
48.
SchillingJ (2006) On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment22(1): 28–37.
49.
SchillingJ (2007) Leaders’ romantic conceptions of the consequences of leadership. Applied Psychology: An International Review56(4): 602–623.
50.
SchillingJ (2009) From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership5: 102–128.
51.
SoyluS (2011) Creating a family or loyalty-based framework: The effects of paternalistic leadership on workplace bullying. Journal of Business Ethics99: 217–231.
52.
StraussACorbinJ(1994) Grounded theory methodology. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 273–285.
53.
SümerHC(2000) A historical and cultural approach to analyzing performance appraisal (in Turkish). In: AycanZ (eds) Management, Leadership and Human Resource Practices in Turkey, Ankara: Turkish Psychological Association, pp. 57–90.
54.
TepperBJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal43: 178–190.
55.
TepperBJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis and research agenda. Journal of Management33: 261–289.
56.
TepperBJMossSEDuffyMK (2011) Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Journal of Management54: 279–294.
57.
TrevinoLKBrownMHartmanLP (2003) A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations56(1): 5–37.
58.
WastiA (2002) Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Test of an integrated model in the Turkish context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations26(5): 525–550.
