The majority of team leadership studies have ignored the specific context in which that leadership takes place and the cyclical correlation of inputs and processes on ongoing performance. It is our contention that leadership is a mediator of team processes and team effectiveness on ongoing functioning of multidisciplinary teams (MDT). The members of 126 multidisciplinary teams responded to a survey on several aspects related to the functioning and leadership of their teams. The results support the hypothesis that leadership does mediate the relationship between reflexivity and effectiveness (i.e. team management performance, boundary spanning and satisfaction) within the team. Theoretically, these findings challenge those of linear models that typically analyse the impact of leadership as something that happens in isolation. Future research should describe and consider not just the team type and tasks but also investigate the roles that context and time play in team leadership.
AhearnKFerrisGRHochwarterWADouglasCAmmeterPP (2004) Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management30: 309–327.
2.
Al-AniBHorspoolABlighMC (2011) Collaborating with ‘Virtual Strangers': Towards developing a framework for leadership in distributed teams. Leadership7(3): 335–365.
3.
AllenSJ (2007) Adult learning theory and leadership development. Kravis Leadership Institute, Leadership Review7: 26–37.
4.
AvolioBJ (2007) Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory building. American Psychologist62: 25–33.
5.
BanduraA (1977) Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
6.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 1173–1182.
7.
BarryCABrittenNBaberNBradleyCStevensonF (1999) Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research9(1): 26–44.
8.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and ‘Performance’ Beyond Expectations. New York: The Free Press.
9.
BeattyKCByingtonBVan VelsorEMcCauleyCDRudermanM (2010) Developing strategic leadership. The Center for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development, 3rd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
BellL (2001) Patterns of interaction in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey, 25(1): 65–80.
11.
BellLFeldmanL (1999) A comparison of multi-disciplinary groups in the UK and New Jersey. Child Abuse Review8: 314–324.
12.
BliesePDKleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 349–381.
13.
BoiesKHowellJ (2006) Leader-member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadership Quarterly17: 246–257.
14.
BrossDCKrugmanRDLenherrMRRosenbergDASchmittBD (1988) New Child Protection Team Handbook. New York: Garland Publishing.
15.
BurkeCSStaglKCKleinCGoodwinGFSalasEHalpinSH (2006) What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly17: 288–307.
16.
CheminaisR (2009) Effective Multi-Agency Partnerships: Putting Every Child Matters into Practice. London: Sage Publications.
17.
ChenGKirkmanBLKanferRAllenDRosenB (2007) A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 331–346.
18.
CogliserCCSchriesheimCA (2000) Exploring work unit context and leader-member exchange: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior21: 487–511.
19.
CohenADovethEEickU (2001) Statistical properties of the rwg (J) index of agreement. Psychological Methods6: 297–310.
20.
DansereauFGraenGHagaWJ (1975) A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance13: 46–78.
21.
DayDVGronnPSalasE (2004) Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly15: 857–880.
22.
EdwardsADanielsHGallagherTLeadbetterJWarmingtonP (2009) Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations. Learning to do Multi-Agency Work. New York: Routledge.
23.
EllsM. J. D. (2000) Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuse. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC.
24.
FallerKCHenryJ (2000) Child sexual abuse: A case study in community collaboration. Child Abuse and Neglect24(9): 1215–1225.
25.
FerrisGRBerksonHMKaplanDMGilmoreDCBuckleyMRHochwarterWAWittLA (1999) Development and initial validation of the political skill inventory. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, 59th Annual National Meeting, Chicago, 6–11 August 1999.
26.
FoelsRDriskellJEMullenBSalasE (2000) The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction: An integration. Small Group Research31: 676–701.
27.
GersickCJHackmanJR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes47: 65–97.
28.
GoodmanLA (1960) On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association55: 708–713.
29.
GraenGBUhl-BienM (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219–247.
30.
HackmanJRDunnetteMDHoughLM (1992) Group influences on individuals in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31.
HackmanJRNohriaNKhuranaR (2010) What is this thing called leadership?. Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice: An HBS Centennial Colloquium on Advancing Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
HackmanJRWagemanR (2005) A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review30: 269–287.
33.
HackmanJRWaltonREGoodmanPS (1986) Leading groups in organizations. Designing Effective Work Groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 72–119.
34.
HendersonDJLidenRCGlibkowskiBCChaudhryA (2009) Within-group LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly20: 517–534.
35.
HirstGMannLBainPPirola-MerloARichterA (2004) Learning to lead: The development and testing of a model of leadership learning. Leadership Quarterly15: 311–327.
36.
HoeglMParboteeahKP (2006) Team reflexivity in innovative projects. RandD Management36(2): 113–125.
37.
IlgenDRHollenbeckJRJohnsonMJundtD (2005) Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology56: 517–543.
38.
JagoAG (1982) Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management Science28(3): 315–336.
39.
JamesLRDemareeRJWolfG (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology69: 85–98.
40.
JamesLRDemareeRJWolfG (1993) Rwg: an assessment of within group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78: 306–309.
41.
JenaroCFloresNAriasB (2007) Burnout and coping in human service practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice38(1): 80–87.
42.
KirkmanBLRosenB (1999) Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal42: 58–74.
43.
KozlowskiSWJBellBSBornanWCIlgenDRKlimoskiRJ (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychological, Vol. 12. London: Wiley, 333–375.
44.
KozlowskiSWJGullySMMcHughPPSalasECannon-BowersJFerrisGR (1996) A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 14. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 253–305.
45.
KozlowskiSWJWatolaDJNowakowskiJMKimBHBoteroICSalasEGoodwinGFBurkeCS (2009) Developing adaptative teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership. Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches (SIOP Frontiers Series). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
46.
KüpersWWeiblerJ (2008) Inter-leadership: Why and how should we think of leadership and followership integrally?. Leadership4(4): 443–475.
47.
LalayantsMEpsteinI (2005) Evaluating multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect teams: A research agenda. Child Welfare84(4): 433–458.
48.
LidenRCAntonakisJ (2009) Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human RelationsXX(X): 1–19.
49.
LimBPloyartR (2004) Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology89(4): 610–621.
50.
MaloneDMGallagherPA (2010) Special education teachers' attitudes and perceptions of teamwork. Remedial and Special Education31(5): 330–342.
51.
MarksMAMathieuJEZaccaroSJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review26(3): 356–376.
52.
McGrathJE (1962) Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training. Washington, DC: US Civil Service Commission, Office of Career Development.
53.
MintzbergH (1985) The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies22: 133–154.
54.
MinvielleEDervauxBRetbiAAegerterPBoumendilAJars-GuincestreMC (2005) Culture, organization, and management in intensive care: Construction and validation of a multidimensional questionnaire. Journal of Critical Care20: 126–138.
55.
MorgesonFP (2005) The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology90: 497–508.
56.
MorgesonFPDeRueDS (2006) Understanding how events disrupt teams and influence team leader intervention. Leadership Quarterly17: 271–287.
57.
MorgesonFPDeRueDSKaramEP (2010) Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management36(1): 5–39.
58.
Munn-GiddingsCHartCRamonS (2005) A participatory approach to the promotion of well-being in the workplace: Lessons from empirical research. International Review of Psychiatry17(5): 409–417.
59.
MurphyM (2004) Developing Collaborative Relationships in Interagency Child Protection Work. Dorset: Russell House Publishing.
60.
NaidooLJScherbaumCAGoldsteinHWGraenGBGraenJA (2008) Examining the relative importance of leader-member exchange on group performance over time. Knowledge Driven Corporation: A Discontinuous Model. LMX Leadership: The Series, Vol. 5. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 211–230.
61.
National Commission of Protection for Children and Youth at Risk (2011) Relatório Anual de Avaliação da Actividade das Comissões de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens no ano de 2010. [Annual Report of Assessment of Commissions of Protection of Children and Youth Activities in the year 2010].
62.
PassosACaetanoA (2005) Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past performance feedback on team effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology20: 231–244.
63.
PearceCLSimsHP (2002) Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice6: 172–197.
64.
PieterseANvan KnippenbergDvan GinkelW (2011) Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes114: 153–164.
65.
PinningtonAH (2011) Leadership development: Applying the same leadership theories and development practices to different contexts?. Leadership7(3): 335–365.
66.
RoeR (2008) Time in Applied Psychology. The study of ‘what happens’ rather than ‘what is’. European Psychologist13(1): 37–52.
67.
SantosSCostaFPassosARamalhoNCaetanoA (2009) A importância das características centrais do trabalho na satisfação com as recompensas [The importance of the central work characteristics in rewards satisfaction]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas61: 85–99.
68.
SchaubroeckJLamSSKChaSE (2007) Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 1020–1030.
69.
SchippersMCDen HartogDNKoopmanPLVan KnippenbergD (2008) The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations61(11): 1593–1616.
70.
ShroutPABolgerN (2002) Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods7: 422–445.
71.
SidenHStraatmanLMillerTHamJ (2009) The Madison Clinic: Evaluation of a collaborative outpatient paediatric palliative care clinic. Paediatrics and Child Health14(6): 379–384.
72.
SmithT. (2011) Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children’s advocacy centers in Pennsylvania.Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA.
73.
SwiftTAWestMA (1998) Reflexivity and group processes: Research and practice. Sheffield: The ESRC Centre for Organization and Innovation.
74.
StidDBradachJ (2009) How visionary nonprofits leaders are learning to enhance management capabilities. Strategy and Leadership37(1): 35–40.
75.
TeslukPEMathieuJE (1999) Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology84: 200–217.
76.
Torres, Pegado, Sarmento, Hilário, Freitas, Sousa, Cruz, and Penha (2008) Estudo de Diagnóstico e Avaliação das Comissões de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens. Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL)[Study for the Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Commissions for the Protection of Children and Youth. Center for Sociology Research and Studies. (CIES-IUL)].
77.
Van GinkelWPvan KnippenbergD (in press) Group leadership and shared task representations in decision making groups. Leadership Quarterly.
78.
WagemanR (2001) How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science12: 559–577.
79.
WagemanRHackmanJRLehmanEV (2005) The Team Diagnostic Survey: Development of an instrument. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science41: 373–398.
80.
WestMAWestMA (1996) Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. Handbook of Work Group Psychology. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 555–579.
81.
ZaccaroSJHeinenBShufflerMSalasEGoodwinGFBurkeCS (2009) Team leadership and team effectiveness. Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches. New York: Routledge, 83–111.
82.
ZaccaroSJRittmanALMarksMA (2001) Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly12: 451–483.
83.
ZimmermanLAmodeoMFasslerIREllisMAClayCM (2003) Training child welfare team leaders using the SPIN leadership guidance model. Children and Youth Services Review25(11): 891–910.
