This research investigates the empirical assumptions behind the claim that leaders exaggerate the importance of their group’s goals more so than non-leaders and that they may use these beliefs to justify deviating from generally accepted moral requirements when doing so is necessary for goal achievement. We tested these biased thought processes across three studies. The results from these three studies established the more-important-than-average effect, both for real and illusory groups. Participants claimed that their group goals are more important than the goals of others, and this effect was stronger for leaders than for non-leading group members. In Study 3, we demonstrated the justification bias and connected this bias to beliefs about the importance of group goals. Participants indicated that they would be more justified than others in engaging in unethical behaviors to attain their group’s goals; leaders reported being more justified in such deviations than non-leaders; and the more highly leaders evaluated their group’s goals, the greater justification bias they reported.
Alicke MD and Govorun O. ( 2005) The better-than-average effect. In: Alicke MD, Dunning DA and Krueger JI (eds) The Self in Social Judgment. New York: Psychology Press, 85-106.
2.
Alicke MD, Klotz ML, Breitenbecher DL, Yurak TJ and Vredenburg DS ( 1995) Personal contact, individuation and the better than average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68: 804-825.
3.
Alicke MD, Vredenburg DS, Hiatt M. and Govorun O. ( 2001) The ‘better than myself effect’. Motivation and Emotion25: 7-22.
4.
Allison ST, Messick DM and Goethals GR ( 1989) On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition7: 275-295.
5.
Baumhart R. ( 1968) An honest profit. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
6.
Billig M. and Tajfel H. ( 1973) Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior . European Journal of Social Psychology3: 27-52.
7.
Brewer MB ( 1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86: 307-324.
8.
Brewer MB and Silver M. ( 1978) Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics . European Journal of Social Psychology8: 393-400.
9.
Chambers JR and Windschitl PD ( 2004) Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of non-motivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects . Psychological Bulletin130: 813-838.
10.
Chemers MM ( 2000) Leadership research and theory: A functional integration . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice4: 27-43.
11.
Doris JM ( 1998) Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Nous32: 504-530.
12.
Doris JM ( 2002) Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior . New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Eden D. and Leviatan U. ( 1975) Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology60: 736-741.
14.
Flanagan O. ( 1991) Varieties of moral personality: Ethics and psychological realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Forsyth DR and Nye JL ( 2008) Seeing and being a leader: The perceptual, cognitive, and interpersonal roots of conferred influence. In: Hoyt CL, Goethals GR and Forsyth DR (eds) Leadership at the crossroads: Leadership and psychology, Vol. 1. Westport, CT: Praeger, 116-129.
16.
Galinsky AD, Jordan J. and Sivanathan N. ( 2008) Harnessing power to capture leadership. In: Ciulla J, Hoyt C, Goethals G and Forsyth D (eds) Leadership at the Crossroads : Vol. 1. Leadership and Psychology . Westport, CT: Praeger, 283-299.
17.
Glover J. ( 2000) Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Goethals R., Messick DM and Allison ST ( 1991) The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison . In: Suls J and Wills TA (eds) Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 149-176.
19.
Goodpaster KE ( 2007) Conscience and Corporate Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
Haidt J. ( 2008) Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science3: 65-72.
21.
Hampton J. ( 1989) The nature of immorality. Social Philosophy and Policy7(1): 22-44.
22.
Harman G. ( 1999) Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society99: 315-331.
23.
Harman G. ( 2003) No character or personality. Business Ethics Quarterly13: 87-94.
24.
Heine SJ and Lehman DR ( 1997) The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72: 1268-1283.
25.
Hogg MA ( 2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review5: 184-200.
26.
Hoorens V. ( 1993) Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison . In: Stroebe W and Hewstone M (eds) European Review of Social Psychology: Vol. 4, Vol. 4. Chichester: Wiley , 113-139.
27.
Howell DC ( 2004) Fundamental Statistics for the Social Sciences , 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole .
28.
Hoyt CL, Simon S and Reid L (2009) Choosing the best (wo)man for the job: The effects of mortality salience, sex, and gender stereotypes on leader evaluations . Leadership Quarterly20: 233-246.
29.
Jaccard J. and Wan CK ( 1996) LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Leary MR and Tangney JP (eds) (2003) Handbook of Self and Identity . New York: Guilford Press.
31.
Lovett F. ( 1997) The community’s pulse: Thinking about values . The Responsive Community7: 87.
32.
Major B., Quinton WJ and Schmader T. ( 2003) Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology39: 220-231.
33.
Messick DM ( 2005) On the psychological exchange between leaders and followers . In: Messick DM and Kramer RM (eds) The psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research. Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum, 81-96.
34.
Messick DM and Bazerman MH ( 1996) Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making . Sloan Management Review37: 9-22.
35.
Messick DM, Bloom S., Boldizar JP and Samuelson CD ( 1985) Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology21: 480-500.
36.
Miller DT, Downs JS and Prentice DA ( 1998) Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: The social bond between birthday mates. European Journal of Social Psychology28: 475-481.
37.
Novicevic MM, Buckley MR, Harvey MG and Fung H. ( 2008) Self-evaluation bias of social comparisons in ethical decision making: The impact of accountability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology38: 1061-1091.
38.
Park B. and Rothbart M. ( 1982) Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42: 1051-1068.
39.
Price P. ( 2000) Wishful thinking in the prediction of competitive outcomes . Thinking and Reasoning6: 161-172.
40.
Price T. ( 2006) Understanding Ethical Failures in Leadership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Sherif M. and Sherif C. ( 1953) Groups in Harmony and Tension. New York: Harper & Bros.
42.
Svenson O. ( 1981) Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica47: 143-148.
43.
Tajfel H. ( 1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
44.
Tajfel H. and Turner JC ( 1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG and Worchel S (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations . Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, 33-47.
45.
Tavris C. and Aronson E. ( 2007) Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. New York : Harcourt.
46.
Van Lange PAM, Taris TW and Vonk R. ( 1997) Dilemmas of academic practice: Perceptions of superiority among social psychologists. European Journal of Social Psychology27: 675-685.
47.
Werhane PH ( 1999) Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making . New York: Oxford University Press.
