This review aims to identify the content of family-based interventions that are commonly used for primary caregivers of people diagnosed with chronic illness. In addition, the psychological-related outcome measures of the FAMIs will be examined.
Methods
PRISMA was adopted for the review process. We searched CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies that implemented a family-based intervention for family caregivers of patients with chronic illness. We reviewed articles published between January 2000 and January 2021. Two independent reviewers, multiple researcher triangulation, and peer review were employed to ensure the validity and reliability of the data.
Results
We included 11 studies in this systematic literature review. In total, seven themes emerged under the content of family-based intervention consisting of family elements, skills, information, activities, positive psychology, recovery, and roles and responsibility. The psychological related outcome measures of the intervention include recovery, patient care management, skills improvement, emotional management, family relationships, and self-functioning.
Discussion
The aspect of family functioning may help the family caregivers to empower themselves and build up their inner strength to face unexpected situations. The results highlighted the importance of the involvement of the experts in family therapy in helping family caregivers. Cultural implications were also highlighted.
AnsahJPChiuCT. Projecting the chronic disease burden among the adult population in the United States using a multi-state population model. Frontiers in Public Health2023; 10.
4.
Escobar PinzonLCClausMZepfKI, et al.Preference for place of death in Germany. J Palliat Med2011; 14: 1097–1103.
5.
NeergaardMAJensenABSondergaardJ, et al.Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark. Scand J Caring Sci2011; 25: 627–636.
6.
KizzaIBMuliiraJK. Determinants of quality of life among family caregivers of adult cancer patients in a resource-limited setting. Support Care Cancer2020; 28: 1295–1304.
7.
TavaresMLPimentaAMGarcía-VivarC, et al.Relationship between level of care dependency and quality of life of family caregivers of care-dependent patients. J Fam Nurs2020; 26: 65–76.
8.
ShinJHKimJH. Family caregivers of people with dementia associate with poor health-related quality of life: a nationwide population-based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 16252.
9.
MatsahNSYusufAAMohd KhaidirAS, et al.A review of family caregiving challenges in Malaysia. Prof Guid Couns J2022; 3: 1–9.
10.
SorayyanezhadANikpeymaNNazariS. The relationship of caregiver strain with resilience and hardiness in family caregivers of older adults with chronic disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs2022; 21: 184.
11.
HaggarS. Families, the heart of palliative care: valuing relationships. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012.
12.
RasquinhaSJShekharR. Effectiveness of family intervention to enhance quality of life of caretakers of persons living with cancer. Adv Sci Lett2018; 24: 196–198.
13.
FunkLStadjuharKIToyeC, et al.Part 2: home based family caregiving at the end of life: a comprehensive review of published qualitative research (1998-2008). Palliat Med2010; 24: 594–607.
14.
HenrikssonAArestedtK. Exploring factors and caregiver outcomes associated with feelings of preparedness for caregiving in family caregivers in palliative care: a correlational, cross sectional study. Palliat Med2013; 27: 639–646.
15.
Rico-BlázquezMQuesada-CuboVPolentinos-CastroE, et al.Health-related quality of life in caregivers of community-dwelling individuals with disabilities or chronic conditions. A gender-differentiated analysis in a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs2022; 21: 69.
16.
MirhosseiniSBazghalehMBasirinezhadM, et al.Health-related quality of life and caregiver’s burden in patients with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review2021; 23: 29–35.
17.
LongNXPhungTTNgocNB, et al.Self-reported psychological distress among caregivers of patients with cancer: Findings from a health facility-based study in Vietnam 2019. Health Psychol Open2020; 7.
18.
HuMLiXZhuY, et al.The role of family caregiving in the management of individuals with mental illnesses and the outcome of family-based interventions for mental illnesses in China: a scoping review. The Lancet Reg Health–Western Pac2024.
19.
CuiPYangMHuH, et al.The impact of caregiver burden on quality of life in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a moderated mediation analysis of the role of psychological distress and family resilience. BMC Public Health2024; 24: 817.
20.
HarropEByrneANelsonA. It’s alright to ask for help”: findings from a qualitative study exploring the information and support needs of family carers at the end of life. BMC Palliat Care2014; 13: 22.
21.
GeardAKirkevoldMLøvstadM,et al.How do family members of individuals with spinal cord and acquired brain injuries make sense of their experiences: a qualitative study of meaning making processes. Health Psychol Open2020; 7: 1–13.
22.
MinuchinS. Families and family therapy. New York: Routledge, 2018
EustaceRGrayBCurryD. The meaning of family nursing intervention: what do acute care nurses think?Res Theory Nurs Pract2015; 29: 125–142.
25.
PahlavanzadehSHeidariFGMaghsudiJ, et al.The effects of family education program on the caregiver burden of families of elderly with dementia disorders. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res2010; 15: 102–108.
26.
EtemadifarSBahramiMShahriariM, et al.The effectiveness of a supportive educative group intervention on family caregiver burden of patients with heart failure. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res2014; 19: 217–223.
27.
NavidianAPahlavanzadehSYazdaniM. The effectiveness of family training on family caregivers of inpatients with mental disorders. Iran J Psychiatr Clin Psychol2010; 16: 99–106.
28.
DuncanL. The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Lived Experiences of Caregivers from the Black Community. PhD Dissertation, Barry University, Florida, 2022.
29.
McCubbinHI. Family stress and coping: a decade review. J Marriage Fam1980; 42: 855–871.
30.
Mohamed ShaffrilHASamsuddinSFAbu SamahA. The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity2021; 55: 1319–1346.
31.
FriedmanMBowedenVJonesE. Family nursing: Research, theory, and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
32.
HongQNFàbreguesSBartlettG, et al.The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf2018; 34: 285–291. ISSN 0167-832.
33.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
34.
FernandesCSAngeloMMartinsMM. Giving voice to caregivers: a game for family caregivers of dependent individuals. Rev Esc Enferm USP2018; 52: e03309.
35.
SotoudehRPahlavanzadehSAlaviM. The effect of a family-based training program on the care burden of family caregivers of patients undergoing hemodialysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res2019; 24: 144–150.
36.
ChoiHVanRM. Mhealth family adaptation intervention for families of young children with down syndrome: a feasibility study. J Pediatr Nurs2020; 50: 69–76.
37.
WacharasinCPhaktoopMSananreangsakS. Examining the usefulness of a family empowerment program guided by the illness beliefs model for families caring for a child with thalassemia. J Fam Nurs2015; 21: 295–321.
38.
ZimanskyMStasielowiczLFrankeI, et al.Effects of implementing a brief family nursing intervention with hospitalized oncology patients and their families in Germany: a quasi experimental. J Fam Nurs2020; 26: 346–357.
39.
GettingsSFrancoFSantoshPJ. Facilitating support groups for siblings of children with neurodevelopmental disorders using audio-conferencing: a longitudinal feasibility study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health2015; 9: 8.
40.
BarreraMNevilleAPurdonL, et al.“It's just for us!” perceived benefits of participation in a group intervention for siblings of children with cancer. J Pediatr Psychol2018; 43: 9951003.
41.
MokuauNBraunKLWongLK, et al.Development of a family intervention for native Hawaiian women with cancer: a pilot study. Soc Work2008; 53: 9–19.
42.
KatsukiFTakeuchiHKonishiM, et al.Pre-post changes in psychosocial functioning among relatives of patients with depressive disorders after brief multifamily psychoeducation: a pilot study. BMC Psychiatry2011; 11: 56.
43.
HickeyLAndersonVHearpsS, et al.Family appraisal of paediatric acquired brain injury: a social work clinical intervention trial. Dev Neurorehabil2018; 21: 457–464.
44.
AllenRSHilgemanMMEgeMA, et al.Legacy activities as interventions approaching the end of life. J Palliat Med2008; 11: 1029–1038.
45.
HansonSMHGedaly-DuffVKaakinenJR. Family health care nursing. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 2001.
46.
SuperDE. A life-span life space approach to career development. In: BrownDBrooksL (eds) Career choice and development: applying contemporary theories to practice. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
47.
LeeE. Access to Health and Social Services for Racial and Ethnic Minority Family Caregivers of Older Adults: Unmet Needs, Satisfaction with Health and Social Services, and Service Use. PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 2020.
48.
WantonoroWKomarudinKImaniaDR, et al.The influence of 6-Month interdisciplinary accompaniment on family caregivers’ knowledge and self-efficacy regarding diabetic wound care. SAGE Open Nurs2023; 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231167801
