People with chronic illness are particularly dependent on navigating and using the health care system. This requires navigational health literacy (HL-NAV). The article aims to examine the distribution and predictors of HL-NAV in a sample of chronically ill individuals.
Methods
Data of 1,105 people with chronic illness from the general population in Germany were collected in December 2019 and January 2020. HL-NAV was assessed by 12 items (score 0–100). Bivariate and multiple linear regression analysis were performed.
Results
HL-NAV score was 39.1 (SD 27.3). In bivariate analyses, HL-NAV was lower among chronically ill persons aged 65 or above, with low education, limited functional health literacy, low social status, financial deprivation, poor social support, multiple chronic conditions, and an illness duration of 6–10 years. In multivariate analyses, advanced age, lower education, less functional health literacy, lower social status, and less social support remained associated with lower HL-NAV.
Discussion
The results underline the importance of promoting HL-NAV among people with chronic illness. Strategies should aim at strengthening individual competencies taking into account the social and situational factors but also at reducing the demands placed on chronically ill people by providing user-friendly and trustworthy information on the health care system along the illness trajectory.
NolteEMcKeeM. Caring for people with chronic conditions: an introduction. In: NolteEMcKeeM (eds) Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2008, pp.1–14.
2.
HolmanHR. Chronic disease and the healthcare crisis. Chronic Illn2005; 1: 265–274.
3.
CorbinJStraussA. Unending work and care: managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988.
4.
BodenheimerT. Coordinating care-a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med2008; 358: 1064–1071.
5.
ØrtenbladLMeillierLJønssonAR. Multi-morbidity: a patient perspective on navigating the health care system and everyday life. Chronic Illn2018; 14: 271–282.
6.
SofaerS. Navigating poorly charted territory: patient dilemmas in health care “nonsystems”. Med Care Res Rev2009; 66: 75–93.
7.
SchaefferD. Der Patient als Nutzer. Krankheitsbewältigung und Versorgungsnutzung im Verlauf chronischer krankheit. Bern: Huber, 2004.
8.
LeeESMuthulingamGChewEAL, et al.Experiences of older primary care patients with multimorbidity and their caregivers in navigating the healthcare system: a qualitative study protocol. J Comorb2020; 10: 1–6.
9.
Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen. Bedarfsgerechte Steuerung der Gesundheitsversorgung: Gutachten 2018. Berlin: SVR, 2018.
10.
HofmarcherMMOxleyHRusticelliE. Improved health system performance through better care coordination. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing, 2007.
11.
SchaefferD. Bewältigung chronischer Krankheit im Lebenslauf – einleitung. In: SchaefferD (ed) Bewältigung chronischer Krankheit im Lebenslauf. Bern: Huber, 2009, pp.7–12.
12.
SørensenKvan den BrouckeSFullamJ, et al.Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health2012; 12: 80.
13.
HaunJNValerioMAMcCormackLA, et al.Health literacy measurement: an inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments. J Health Commun2014; 19: 302–333.
14.
SchulzPHartungU. The future of health literacy. In: SchaefferDPelikanJM (eds) Health literacy: forschungsstand und perspektiven. Bern: Hogrefe, 2017, pp.79–91.
15.
StilleyCSTerhorstLFlynnWB, et al.Medication health literacy measure: development and psychometric properties. J Nurs Meas2014; 22: 213–222.
16.
OkanOBollwegTMBerensE-M, et al.Coronavirus-Related health literacy: a cross-sectional study in adults during the COVID-19 infodemic in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 5503.
17.
van der VaartRDrossaertC. Development of the digital health literacy instrument: measuring a broad spectrum of health 1.0 and health 2.0 skills. J Med Internet Res2017; 19: e27.
18.
GrieseLBerensE-MNowakP, et al.Challenges in navigating the health care system: development of an instrument measuring navigation health literacy. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 5731.
19.
RuddREKirschIYamamotoK. Literacy and health in America. Policy Information Report, 2004. Princeton: ETS.
20.
OsborneRHBatterhamRWElsworthGR, et al.The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health2013; 13: 658.
21.
BeauchampABuchbinderRDodsonS, et al.Distribution of health literacy strengths and weaknesses across socio-demographic groups: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health2015; 15: 678.
22.
BourneAPeerbuxSJessupR, et al.Health literacy profile of recently hospitalised patients in the private hospital setting: a cross sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 877.
23.
KapsLHildebrandKNagelM, et al.Risk factors for poorer health literacy in patients with liver cirrhosis. PLoS One2021; 16: e0255349.
24.
The HLS19 Consortium of the WHO Action Network M-POHL. International Report on the Methodology, Results, and Recommendations of the European Health Literacy Population Survey 2019-2021 (HLS19) of M-POHL. Vienna: Austrian National Public Health Institute, 2021.
25.
SchaefferDBerensE-MVogtD, et al.Health literacy in Germany-findings of a representative follow-up survey. Dtsch Arztebl Int2021; 118: 723–729.
26.
SchneiderSL. The conceptualisation, measurement, and coding of education in German and cross-national surveys. GESIS survey guidelines. Mannheim: GESIS - Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften; GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2016.
27.
WeissBDMaysMZMartzW, et al.Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med2005; 3: 514–522.
28.
AdlerNEEpelESCastellazzoG, et al.Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychol2000; 19: 586–592.
29.
DalgardOSDowrickCLehtinenV, et al.Negative life events, social support and gender difference in depression: a multinational community survey with data from the ODIN study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2006; 41: 444–451.
30.
GuiXChenYPineKH. Navigating the healthcare service “Black Box”. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact2018; 2: 1–26.
31.
RavenscroftEF. Navigating the health care system: insights from consumers with multi-morbidity. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn2010; 2: 215–224.
32.
WhiteCLentinPFarnworthL. Multimorbidity and the process of living with ongoing illness. Chronic Illn2016; 12: 83–97.
33.
MaresovaPJavanmardiEBarakovicS, et al.Consequences of chronic diseases and other limitations associated with old age - a scoping review. BMC Public Health2019; 19: 1431.
34.
SperosCI. More than words: promoting health literacy in older adults. Online J Issues Nurs2009; 14: 6.
35.
SørensenKPelikanJMRöthlinF, et al.Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health2015; 25: 1053–1058.
36.
SvendsenMTBakCKSørensenK, et al.Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: a large national population-based survey among Danish adults. BMC Public Health2020; 20: 565.
37.
StormacqCvan den BrouckeSWosinskiJ. Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review. Health Promot Int2019; 34: e1–e17.
38.
SchramMTAssendelftWJJvan TilburgTG, et al.Social networks and type 2 diabetes: a narrative review. Diabetologia2021; 64: 1905–1916.
39.
SchaefferD. Chronische Krankheit und health literacy. In: SchaefferDPelikanJM (eds) Health literacy: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven. Bern: Hogrefe, 2017, pp.53–70.
40.
LiuY-BHouPXueH-P, et al.Social support, health literacy, and health care utilization Among older adults. Asia Pac J Public Health2019; 31: 359–366.
41.
ManezeDSalamonsonYPoudelC, et al.Health-Seeking behaviors of Filipino migrants in Australia: the influence of persisting acculturative stress and depression. J Immigr Minor Health2016; 18: 779–786.
42.
SentellTPittRBuchthalOV. Health literacy in a social context: review of quantitative evidence. Health Lit Res Pract2017; 1: e41–e70.
43.
HeidemannCScheidt-NaveCBeyerA-K, et al.Gesundheitliche Lage von Erwachsenen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse zu ausgewählten Indikatoren der Studie GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. J Health Monitor2021; 6: 1–27.
44.
ParkerRM. Measuring health literacy: what? So what? Now what? In: HernandezLM (ed) Measures of health literacy: workshop summary. Washington, D.C: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, 2009, pp.91–98.
45.
MogobeKDShaibuSMatshedisoE, et al.Language and culture in health literacy for people living with HIV: perspectives of health care providers and professional care team members. AIDS Res Treat2016; 2016: 5015707.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
