Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Most chronic disease self-management interventions emphasise the integral role of self-efficacy in achieving behaviour change. We explored the applicability of this model in a low-income setting, from the perspective of both patients and clinicians.

Methods

Interviews with multimorbid patients and their health providers at two rural community health centres in Victoria, Australia. We used a phenomenological methodology, exploring themes of confidence to manage health, outcome expectations and goals.

Results

Many assumptions in which the self-efficacy model is grounded did not apply to this population. Past experiences and resource constraints, especially poverty and healthcare access, influenced confidence, expectations and the ability to achieve desired outcomes.

Discussion

The focus of traditional self-management support on individual behaviour change disadvantages rural low-income patients, who face barriers related to life experience and resource constraints. For this group, self-management support needs to return to its roots, moving away from a narrow conception of behaviour change and reinstating the role of ‘support’ into ‘self-management support’ interventions. Health providers working in rural low-income settings should recognise the limits inherent in self-efficacy focussed interventions and think broadly about engaging with their clients in whatever way supports them to find a life with meaning and purpose.

Keywords

self-management self-efficacy chronic disease rural low income

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lorig

Holman

. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2003; 26: 1–7.

Barlow

Wright

Sheasby

, et al. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 48: 177–187.

Walker

Swerissen

Belfrage

. Self-management: its place in the management of chronic illnesses. Aust Health Rev 2003; 26: 34–42. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review.

Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit. Capabilities for supporting prevention and chronic condition self-management: a resource for educators of primary health care professionals. In: Australian government department of health and aging, (ed.). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009.

Bandura

. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1997.

Greenhalgh

. Primary health care: theory and practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.

Greenhalgh

. Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. Br Med J 2009; 338: –9.

Hardman

Begg

Spelten

. What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 150.

Figaro

Elasy

Belue

, et al. Exploring socioeconomic variations in diabetes control strategies: impact of outcome expectations. J Natl Med Assoc 2009; 101: 18–23.

10.

Bartlett

Lambert

McCusker

, et al. Self-management across chronic diseases: targeting education and support needs. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103: 398–404.

11.

Clark

Frankel

Morgan

, et al. The meaning and significance of self-management among socioeconomically vulnerable older adults. Journal of Gerontology: SOCIAL SCIENCES 2008; 63B: S312–S319.

12.

Aweko

De Man

Absetz

, et al. Patient and provider dilemmas of type 2 diabetes self-management: a qualitative study in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in Stockholm. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091810.

13.

Caplan LS

. Socioeconomic status and financial coping strategies: the mediating role of perceived control. Soc Psychol Q 2007; 70: 43–58.

14.

Murray

Rodgers

Fraser

. Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status, control beliefs and exercise behavior: a multiple mediator model. J Behav Med 2012; 35: 63–73.

15.

Packer

Boldy

Ghahari

, et al.

Self-management programs conducted within a practice setting: who participates, who benefits and what can be learned?

Patient Educ Couns 2012; 87: 93–100.

16.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's Health 2020 (2021, accessed 23/3/21). https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/australias-health

17.

Hardman

Begg

Spelten

. Healthcare professionals’ perspective on treatment burden and patient capacity in low-income rural populations: challenges and opportunities. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021–01387-y

18.

Skinner

. A guide to constructs of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71: 549–570.

19.

Sokol

Fisher

. Peer support for the hardly reached: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2016; 106: e1–e8 Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t.

20.

Sadler

Wolfe

McKevitt

. Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. SAGE Open Med 2014; 2. DOI: 10.1177/2050312114544493. 2050312114544493. 2014/01/01.

21.

Kenning

Fisher

Bee

, et al. Primary care practitioner and patient understanding of the concepts of multimorbidity and self-management: a qualitative study. SAGE Open Med 2013; 1. DOI: 10.1177/2050312113510001.

22.

Corbin

Strauss

. Unending work and care: managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988.

23.

Franklin

Lewis

Willis

, et al. Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Chronic Illn 2018; 14: 79–103.

24.

Coventry

Small

Panagioti

, et al. Living with complexity marshalling resources: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of lived experience of mental and physical multimorbidity. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16(171). DOI 10.1186/s12875-015-0345-3

25.

Kendall

Rogers

. Extinguishing the social?: state sponsored self-care policy and the chronic disease self-management programme. Disabil Soc 2007; 22: 129–143.

26.

Boehmer

Dobler

Thota

, et al. Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN discussion aid. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e029105.

27.

Tinetti

Naik

Dindo

, et al. Association of patient priorities-aligned decision-making With patient outcomes and ambulatory health care burden among older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2019. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235.

28.

O’Brien

Wyke

Guthrie

, et al. An ‘endless struggle’: a qualitative study of general practitioners’ and practice nurses’ experiences of managing multimorbidity in socio-economically deprived areas of Scotland. Chronic Illn 2011; 7: 45–59.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.02 MB

0.47 MB

Self-efficacy in disadvantaged communities: Perspectives of healthcare providers and clients