Adherence to treatment has proven to require the involvement of patients in treatment and care planning. This process involves incorporating patient knowledge, or knowledge about the patients’ everyday life, into the clinical encounter. This article explores the disclosure practices of such knowledge from older adults with multimorbidity.
Methods
This was an 18-month qualitative study among 14 older adults with multimorbidity living in Denmark. A thematic analysis was applied, focusing on perceptions of patient knowledge and disclosure practices among the participating patients.
Results
Older adults with multimorbidity have various reasons for not disclosing personal knowledge. The results present three different domains of what we termed discarded patient knowledge: (1) knowledge that had no direct biomedical relevance from participants’ perspective; (2) knowledge considered too private; and (3) knowledge assumed to position one as inferior.
Discussion
The participants made judgments on what they believed was welcome in the clinical encounter, framing their knowledge within the purview of biomedicine. Participants’ disclosure practices showed that personal knowledge is sometimes not recognized as important for health and care by participants themselves. Knowledge that could have influenced practitioners’ understanding of the problem and provided different solutions, is argued to be discarded patient knowledge.
WilladsenTGBebeAKoster-RasmussenR. et al.
The role of diseases, risk factors and symptoms in the definition of multimorbidity – a systematic review. Scand J Primary Health Care2016;
34: 112–2110.
2.
ViolanCFoguet-BoreuQFlores-MateoG. et al.
Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One2014;
9: e10214910.
3.
MarengoniAAnglemanSMelisR. et al.
Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Age Res Rev2011;
10: 430–910.
4.
BählerCHuberCABrünggerB. et al.
Multimorbidity, health care utilization and costs in an elderly community-dwelling population: a claims data based observational study. BMC Health Serv Res2015;
15: 2310.
5.
PloegJMatthew-MaichNFraserK. et al.
Managing multiple chronic conditions in the community: a Canadian qualitative study of the experiences of older adults, family caregivers and healthcare providers. BMC Geriatr2017;
17: 4010.
6.
ØrtenbladLMeillierLJønssonAR.Multi-morbidity: a patient perspective on navigating the health care system and everyday life. Chronic Illness. 2018; 14: 271–282.
7.
RosbachM andAndersenJS.Patient-experienced burden of treatment in patients with multimorbidity – a systematic review of qualitative data. Plos One2017;
12: e017991610.
8.
ShippeeNDShahNDMayCR. et al.
Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice. J Clin Epidemiol2012;
65: 1041–1051, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.005
9.
PattonDECadoganCARyanC. et al.
Improving adherence to multiple medications in older people in primary care: selecting intervention components to address patient-reported barriers and facilitators. Health Expect2018;
21: 138–4810.
10.
NelsonMERejeskiWJBlairSN. et al.
Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College ofSports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exercise2007;
39: 1435–4510.
11.
ChernoffR.Nutrition and health promotion in older adults. J Gerontol: Ser A2001;
56: 47–5310.
12.
PamukERWilliamsonDFSerdulaMK. et al.
Weight loss and subsequent death in a cohort of U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med1993;
119: 744–810.
13.
CoulterA. Understanding the experience of illness and treatment. In: Ziebland S, Coulter A, Calabrese JD, Locock L (eds) Understanding and using health experiences: improving patient care. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.
14.
SackettDLRosenbergWMCGrayJAM. et al.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ1996;
312: 71–210.
15.
MartinLRWilliamsSLHaskardKB. et al.
The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag2005;
1: 189–199.
16.
GuassoraADGannikD.Developing and maintaining patients' trust during general practice consultations: the case of smoking cessation advice. Patient Educ Couns2010;
78: 46–5210.
17.
Broholm-JørgensenMGuassoraADReventlowS. et al.
Balancing trust and power: a qualitative study of GPs perceptions and strategies for retaining patients in preventive health checks. Scand J Primary Health Care2017;
35: 89–9710.
18.
PolsJ.Knowing patients: turning patient knowledge into science. Sci Technol Human Values2014;
39: 73–9710.
19.
KleinmanA.Patients and healers in the context of culture.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press, 1980.
20.
LimCBerryABLHirschTet al. “It just seems outside my health”: how patients with chronic conditions perceive communication boundaries with providers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on designing interactive systems, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. ACM, 4–8 June 2016, pp.1172–1184.
21.
BarryCABradleyCPBrittenN. et al.
Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ2000;
320: 1246–5010.
22.
FarberBA.Patient self-disclosure: a review of the research. J Clin Psychol2003;
59: 589–60010.
23.
HeritageJRobinsonJD.Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care. In: MaynardDWHeritageJ (eds) Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp.48–85.
24.
PedersenKMAndersenJSSøndergaardJ.General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Family Med2012;
25: S34–S810.
25.
ZieblandS.Narrative interviewing. In: ZieblandSCoulterACalabreseJDLocockL (eds) Understanding and using health experiences: improving patient care.
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press, 2013.
26.
DewaltKDeWaltB.Participant observations. A guide for fieldworkers.
Walnut Creek, CA:
AltaMira; 2002.
27.
CoulterACollinsA.Making shared decision-making a reality. No decision about me, without me.
London, UK:
Kings Fund, 2011.
28.
GreenARCarrilloJEBetancourtJR.Why the disease-based model of medicine fails our patients. Western J Med2002;
176: 141–143.
29.
NaikAD.On the road to patient centeredness. JAMA Intern Med2013;
173: 218–910.
30.
EpsteinRMStreetRLJr.The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med2011;
9: 100–310.
31.
HanyokLAHellmannDBRandC. et al.
Practicing patient-centered care. The questions clinically excellent physicians use to get to know their patients as individuals. Patient2012;
5: 141–510.
32.
CoulterA.Patient engagement–what works?J Ambulat Care Manage2012;
35: 80–910.
33.
WallaceESalisburyCGuthrieB. et al.
Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care. BMJ: Br Med J2015; 350: h176.
34.
BalintM.He doctor, his patient and the illness.
London:
Pitman, 1957.
35.
EngelGL.The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science1977;
196: 129–136.
36.
FasuloAPinoM.Sharing knowledge and shaping identities in healthcare interactions. Patient Educ Counsel99 2016; 99: 875–877.
37.
Joseph-WilliamsNElwynGEdwardsA.Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Counsel2014;
94: 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031
38.
Bente PrytzMKirkengenALAnnaL
, et al.
What do GPs actually know about their patients as persons?Eur J Person Centered Healthcare2013;
1: 149–160.
39.
RozenblumRLisbyMHockeyPM. et al.
Uncovering the blind spot of patient satisfaction: an international survey. BMJ Qual Safe2011;
20: 959–6510.
40.
HeislerM.Eliciting personal values of patients with multiple chronic conditions: why and how. J Gen Intern Med2017; 32: 1273–1274. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4183-y.
41.
RatanawongsaNKarterAJParkerMM. et al.
Communication and medication adherence: the diabetes study of Northern California. JAMA Intern Med2013;
173: 210–810.
42.
LohALeonhartRWillsCE. et al.
The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression. Patient Educ Counsel2007;
65: 69–7810.
43.
ArnetzJEAlminIBergströmK. et al.
Active patient involvement in the establishment of physical therapy goals: effects on treatment outcome and quality of care. Adv Physiother2004;
6: 50–6910.
44.
KristensenMATHølge-HazeltonBWaldorffFB. et al.
How general practitioners perceive and assess self-care in patients with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract2017;
18: 109.
45.
DavidsenAReventlowS. Different approaches to understanding patients in general practice in Denmark: a qualitative study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling2011; 39: 209–226.
46.
JulliardKVivarJDelgadoC. et al.
What Latina patients don’t tell their doctors: a qualitative study. Ann Family Med2008;
6: 543–910.
47.
TimmermansSTavoryI.Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol Theory2012;
30: 167–8610.
48.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006;
3: 77–10110.
