Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-12
“Because everything changes that day;you don't do the routine”: Alterations and activities chronically ill women undertake on days with health care provider appointments
Research points to the importance of interactions with health care providers for chronically ill patients. Meanwhile, we know little about how visits to providers' offices are accommodated in these patients' lives. This analysis identifies the full scope of routine alterations and preparatory activities that require chronically will women's time and energy specifically on appointment days.
Methods
55 semi-structured interviews were conducted with women with fibromyalgia syndrome living in Ontario, Canada. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the constant-comparative technique.
Results
Two trajectories are identified: (1) alterations to daily routines on appointment days; and (2) activities to prepare for the provider–patient interaction. Factors such as wanting to minimize symptom exacerbation, desires to come across as informed patients, limited time afforded to interactions, and access to transportation explain why these particular routine alterations and preparatory activities were undertaken.
Discussion
Findings demonstrate that the health care provider–patient interaction does not start or end in the space of the provider's office but is, rather, an event that is part of a larger process primarily focused on its successful negotiation. This suggests that the boundaries of the appointment need to be reconsidered, which holds implications for appointment-focused interventions aimed at chronically ill patients.
Health Quality Ontario. Continuity of care to optimize chronic disease management in the community setting: An evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser2013; 13(6): 1–41.
2.
Van LangenbergDRAndrewsJM. Satisfaction with patient-doctor relationships in inflammatory bowel diseases: Examining patient-initiated change of specialist. World J Gastroenterol2012; 18(18): 2212–2218.
3.
GoodinABlumenscheinKFreemanPR. Consumer/patient encounters with prescription drug monitoring programs: Evidence from a medicaid population. Pain Physician2012; 3(3 Suppl): ES169–ES175.
4.
JonesDECarsonKABleichSN. Patient trust in physicians and adoption of lifestyle behaviors to control high blood pressure. Patient Educ Couns2012; 89(1): 57–62.
5.
ThorneSEHarrisSRMahoneyK. The context of health care communication in chronic illness. Patient Educ Couns2004; 54(3): 299–306.
6.
RoyerA. Life with chronic illness: Social and psychological dimensions, London, UK: Praeger, 1998.
7.
CrooksVAChouinardVWiltonRD. Understanding, embracing, rejecting: Women's negotiations of disability constructions and categorizations after becoming chronically ill. Soc Sci Med2008; 67: 1837–1846.
8.
ClarkeJNJamesS. The radicalized self: the impact on the self of the contested nature of diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome. Soc Sci Med2003; 57: 1387–1395.
9.
ZoffmannVHarderIKirkevoldM. A person-centred communication and reflection model: Shared decision-making in chronic care. Qual Health Res2008; 18(5): 670–685.
10.
BerganderBErdurLKallenbach-DermutzB. Younger and older chronic somatoform pain patients in psycho-diagnostics, physician-patient relationship and treatment outcome. Biopsychosoc Med2013; 7: 4.
11.
BuiT. Physician–patient relationship in type 2 diabetes. J Gen Intern Med2012; 27(10): 1242.
12.
FarinEMederM. Personality and the physician-patient relationship as predictors of quality of life of cardiac patients after rehabilitation. Health Qual Life Outcomes2010; 8: 100.
13.
BarkerK. The fibromyalgia story – medical authority & women's worlds of pain, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2005.
14.
HaugliLStrandEFinsetA. How do patients with rheumatic disease experience their relationship with their doctors? A qualitative study of experiences of stress and support in the doctor-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns2004; 52: 169–174.
15.
PageLAWesselyS. Medically unexplained symptoms: exacerbating factors in the doctor-patient encounter. J R Soc Med2003; 96(5): 223–227.
16.
Daker-WhiteGSandersCGreenfieldJ. Getting a diagnosis vs. learning to live with it? The case of the progressive ataxias. Chronic Illn2011; 7(2): 120–133.
17.
BelkoraJEdlowBAvivC. Training community resource centre and clinic personnel to prompt patients in listing questions for doctors: Follow-up interviews about barriers and facilitators to the implementation of consultation planning. Implement Sci2008; 3: 6.
18.
ClauwDJCroffordLJ. Chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia: What we know, and what we need to know. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol2003; 17(4): 685–701.
19.
WolfeFWalittBTKatzRS. Symptoms, the nature of fibromyalgia, and diagnostic and statistical manual 5 (DSM-5) defined mental illness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. PLoS One2014; 9(2): e88740.
20.
WernerAMalterudK. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Soc Sci Med2003; 57: 1409–1419.
21.
RadleyAMayberryJPearceM. Time, space and opportunity in the outpatient consultation: ‘The doctor's story.’. Soc Sci Med2008; 66: 1484–1496.
22.
CrooksVA. “I go on the Internet: I always, you know, check to see what's new”: Chronically ill women's use of online health information to shape and inform doctor-patient interactions in the space of care provision. ACME: Int E-Journal Crit Geograp2006; 5(1): 50–69.
23.
BoeijeH. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant2002; 36: 391–409.
24.
CrooksVA. Exploring the altered daily geographies and lifeworlds of women living with fibromyalgia syndrome: A mixed-method approach. Soc Sci Med2007; 64(3): 577–588.
25.
CrooksVAWomen's changing experiences of the home and life inside it after becoming chronically ill. In: ChouinardVHallEWiltonR (eds). Towards enabling geographies: ‘Disabled’ bodies and minds in society and space, Aldershot and Vermont: Ashgate Publishers, 2010, pp. 45–62.
26.
MacKianS. Contours of coping: mapping the subject world of long-term illness. Health Place2000; 6(2): 95–104.
27.
CorbinJStraussA. Managing chronic illness at home: Three lines of work. Qual Sociol1985; 8(3): 224–247.
28.
GoffmanE. Presentation of self in everyday life, New York, NY: Anchor, 1959.
29.
YantziNRosenbergMWBurkeSO. The impacts of distance to hospital on families with a child with a chronic condition. Soc Sci Med2001; 52: 1777–1791.
30.
TakahashiLMWiebeDRodriguezR. Navigating the time-space context of HIV and AIDS: daily routines and access to care. Soc Sci Med2001; 53: 845–863.
31.
BrownPZavestoskiSMcCormickS. Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociol Health Illn2004; 1: 50–80.
32.
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Wait times for priority procedures in Canada, 2014. Report, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Canada, March 2014.
33.
BauerGR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med2014; v110: 10–17.
34.
MasseyD. Geographies of Responsibility. Geogr Ann2004; 86B(1): 5–18.
