Background: Social comparisons influence self-evaluation and social and psychological adjustment to illness but are under-explored in relation to self-skills training group situations.
Methods: A longitudinal qualitative study embedded within an RCT of a national programme of lay led self-care support in England (Department of Health, 2001). In-depth interviews were undertaken with a purposeful maximum variation sample of recruits. Data were analysed thematically. Three key themes emerged highlighting (1) the experience of group participation and interaction, (2) the process and (3) function of social comparison.
Results: Data highlight the salience of social comparison as an underlying feature of the group dynamics of self-care skills training. The nature, dimensions and scope of social comparisons extend beyond the cognitive states and dimensions traditionally forming the focus of social—psychological approaches to social comparison to include wider dimensions including entitlement to resources. The results confirm the tendency to make positive comparisons that result in beneficial self-evaluations. However, positive comparisons allow respondents to present themselves as socially and morally worthy, which may act to mask the identification of appropriate need and inequalities.
Conclusion: Social comparisons function both as an accurate representation of internal cognitive states but also constitutes identity work involving competing values and moral requirements. We show that even those who report significant needs will sometimes portray themselves in a way that suggests positive social comparisons, which fit with a rationed and morally prescriptive and acceptable view of entitlement to NHS services. Such insights suggest that social comparisons in initiatives such as the EPP may be beneficial for some but exacerbate rather than alleviate health inequalities in long-term condition management for others.
Leventhal H. , Hudson S., Robitaille C.Social comparison and health: a process model. In: Buunk BP, Gibbons FX, eds. Health, coping and well-being: perspectives from social comparison theory . Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1997: 411-32.
2.
Dibb B., Yardley L.Factors important for the measurement of social comparison in chronic illness: a mixed-methods study. Chronic Illn2006; 2: 219-30.
3.
O’Cathain A., Goode J., Luff D., Strangleman T., Hanlon G., Greatbatch D.Does NHS Direct empower patients?Soc Sci Med2005 ; 61: 1761-71.
4.
Wilkinson S. , Kitzinger C.Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Soc Sci Med2000; 50: 797-811.
5.
Wilkinson RGPutting the picture together prosperity, redistribution, health and welfare . In: Auerbach JA, Krimgold BK, eds. Income, socio-economic status and health: exploring the relationships. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999 .
6.
Department of Health.The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century, 2001. London, Crown Copyright, Ref Type: Report.
7.
Festinger L.A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations1954; 7: 117-40.
8.
Wood JV, Taylor KLServing self-relevant goals through social comparison. In: Suls J, Wills TA , eds. Social comparison: contemporary theory and research . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1991: 23-49.
9.
Suls J., Martin R., Wheeler L.Social comparison: why, with whom, and with what effect?Curr Direct Psychol Sci2002; 11: 159-63.
10.
Bennenbroek FTC , Buunk BP, van der Zee KI, Grol B.Social comparison and patient information: what do cancer patients want?Patient Educ Couns2002; 47: 5-12.
11.
Devillis R. , Blalock S., Holt K., Renner B., Blanchard L., Klotz M.Arthritis patients’ reactions to unavoidable social comparisons. Pers Soc Psychol Bull1991; 17: 392-99.
12.
Tennen H., Affleck G.Social comparison as a coping process: a critcal review and application to chronic pain disorder. In: Buunk BP , Gibbons FX, eds. Health, coping and well-being: perspectives from social comparison theory. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. , 1997: 263-98.
13.
Affleck G., Tennen H., Pfeiffer C., Fifield J., Rowe J.Downward comparison and coping with serious medical problems. Am J Orthopsychiatry1991; 57: 570-8.
14.
Wills TADownward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychol Bull1981; 90: 245-71.
15.
Taylor SE, Lobel M.Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts . Psychol Rev1989; 96: 569-75.
16.
Buunk BPComparison direction and comparison dimension among disabled individuals: toward a refined conceptualization of social comparison under stress. Pers Soc Psychol Bull1995; 21: 316-30.
17.
Taylor SE, Buunk BP, Aspinwall LGSocial comparison, stress, and coping. Pers Soc Psychol Bull1990; 16: 74-89.
18.
Tennen H., Affleck G.Benefit-finding and benefit-reminding. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, eds. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002: 584-97.
19.
Van der ZK, Oldersma F., Buunk BP, Bos D.Social comparison preferences among cancer patients as related to neuroticism and social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol1998; 75: 801-10.
20.
Faircloth CA , Boylstein C., Rittman M., Young MESudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociol Health Illness2004; 26: 242-61.
21.
Pound P., Compertz P., Ebrahim S.Illness in the context of older age: the case of stroke. Sociol Health Illness1998; 20: 489-506.
22.
Carricaburu D., Pierret J.From biographical disruption to biographical reinforcement: the case of HIV-positive men. Sociol Health Illness1995; 17: 65-88.
23.
Comaroff J. , Maguire P.Ambiguity and the search for meaning: childhood leukaemia in the modern clinical context. Soc Sci Med1981; 158: 115-23.
24.
Sandaunet AGThe challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociol Health Illness2008; 30: 131-144.
25.
Bury M.Illness narratives: fact or fiction?Sociol Health Illness2001; 23: 263-85.
26.
Sanders C., Donovan J., Dieppe P.The significance and consequences of having painful and disabled joints in older age: co-existing accounts of normal and disrupted biographies. Sociol Health Illness2002; 24: 227-53.
27.
Williams G.The genesis of chronic illness: narrative re-construction . Sociol Health Illness1984 ; 6: 175-200.
28.
Wood JVTheory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes . Psychol Bull1989; 106: 231-48.
29.
Barlow JH, Bancroft GV, Turner APSelf-management training for people with chronic disease: a shared learning experience. J Health Psychol2005 ; 10: 863-72.
30.
Carmack Taylor CL, Kulik J., Badr H., et al . A social comparison theory analysis of group composition and efficacy of cancer support group programs. Soc Sci Med2007; 65: 262-73.
31.
Dibb B., Yardley L.How does social comparison within a self-help group influence adjustment to chronic illness? A longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med2006; 63: 1602-13.
32.
Helgeson VS , Cohen S., Schulz R., Yasko J.Group support interventions for people with cancer: benefits and hazards. In: Baum A, Andersen BL, eds. Psychosocial interventions for cancer . Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, 2001: 269-86.
33.
Lee V., Rogers A., Kennedy A.Implementing and managing self-management skills training within primary care organisations: a national survey of the expert patients programme within its pilot phase. Implement Sci2006; doi:10-1186/1748-59081-6.
34.
Donaldson L.Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS 9. BMJ2003; 326: 1279-80.
35.
Lorig KR, Sobel D., Stewart ALP, et al . Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care1999; 37: 5-14.
36.
Bandura A.Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev1977; 84: 191-215.
37.
Fu D., Fu H., McGowan P., et al . Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shanghai, China: randomized controlled trial . Bull World Health Organ2003; 81: 174-82.
38.
Kennedy A., Reeves D., Bower P., et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health2007; 61: 254-61.
Adamsen L., Rasmussen JMSociological perspectives on self-help groups: reflections on conceptualization and social processes. J Adv Nurs2001; 35: 909-17.
41.
Schiff M., Bargal D.Helping characteristics of self-help and support groups. Small Group Res2000; 31: 275-304.
42.
Britten N.Qualitative interviews in medical research. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)1995; 311: 251-53.
43.
Morse JM, Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., Spiers J.Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. IJQM2002; 1.
44.
Gately C., Rogers A., Sanders C.Rethinking the relationship between long-term condition self-management education and the utilisation of health services. Soc Sci Med2007; 65: 934-45.
45.
Mishler E.Research interviewing: context and narrative. London: Harvard University Press, 1986.
46.
Coffey A., Atkinson P.Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies . London: Sage, 1996.
47.
Goffman E. Stigma .Notes on the management of spoiled identity . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964.
48.
Newman J., Vidler E.Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: consumerism and the modernisation of health care. J Soc Policy, 2006; 35: 193-209.
49.
Rogers A., Bury M., Kennedy A. Rationality , rhetoric and religiousity in health care: the case of the Expert Patients Programme. Int J Health Serv2009; 39: 745-7.
50.
Blaxter M.Why do the victims blame themselves?. In: Radley A, ed. Worlds of illness: biographical and cultural persepctives on health and disease. London: Routledge, 1993: 124-42.
51.
Williams GH , Wood PHComing to terms with chronic illness: the negotiation of autonomy in rheumatoid arthritis. Int Disabil Stud1988; 10: 128-33.
52.
Cornwell J.Hard earned lives - accounts of health & illness from East London . London: Tavistock, 1984.
53.
Pollock K.Maintaining face in the presentation of depression: constraining the therapeutic potential of the consultation. Health ( London) 2007; 11: 163-80.
54.
Britten N.Lay views of drugs and medicine: orthodox and unorthodox accounts . In: Williams SJ, Calnan M, eds. Modern medicine. Lay perspectives and experiences . London: UCL Press , 1996: 48-73.
55.
Wilkinson S. , Kitzinger C.Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Soc Sci Med2000; 50: 797-811.
56.
Kennedy A., Rogers A., Crossley M.Participation, roles, and the dynamics of change in a group-delivered self-management course for people living with HIV. Qual Health Res2007; 17: 744-58.
Department of Health.Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services, 2006, Crown, Report.
59.
Kennedy A., Rogers A., Gately C.Assessing the introduction of the expert patients programme into the NHS: a realistic evaluation of recruitment to a national lay-led self-care initiative . Prim Health Care Res Dev2005 ; 6: 137-48.
60.
Buunk BP, Ybema JFSelective evaluation and coping with stress: making one’s situation cognitively more livable. J Appl Soc Psychol1995; 25: 1499-1517.
