Objectives: To provide an overview of issues raised by conducting research in the area of chronic childhood illness, using the example of childhood cancer.
Methods: This literature review used informal methods.
Results: Children with cancer and their families may participate in a wide variety of studies in different research traditions, including social science studies, epidemiological, biological and genetic research, and clinical trials. Different concerns about research participation have been raised in these different contexts. Sociological debate has tended to characterize exclusion from research as a manifestation of assumptions of poor competence on the part of children, and to see inclusion in research as a means of restoring proper balance in power relations and giving children a voice. The ethical imperative within clinical research, on the other hand, has been in favour of protection of individuals from risk or direct harm. Lack of consensus on issues such as the status of children's consent for research participation persists, in part because debates have taken place within rather than across disciplinary boundaries, and in part because of a tendency to debate issues as ethical principles in an empirical vacuum. The lack of research on the experiences and views of those asked to take part in childhood cancer research is striking.
Discussion: It is important that debates about the involvement of children in research are informed by high-quality social science research and by interdisciplinary dialogue.
Santelli J.Human subjects protection and parental permission in adolescent health research . J Adolesc Health1997; 21: 384—7.
2.
Glantz LHResearch with children. Am J Law Med1998; 24: 213—44.
3.
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child2000; 82: 177—82.
4.
MedicalResearch Council. Ethics guide: medical research involving children. London: Medical Research Council, 2004.
5.
Dixon-Woods M. , Young B., Heney D.Rethinking childhood cancer: a multidisciplinary approach to chronic childhood illness. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005.
6.
Haimes E.What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics2002; 16: 89—113.
7.
Mayall B.Towards a sociology for childhood: thinking from children's lives. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
8.
Glover S.Why won't they listen to us? On giving power and voice to children participating in research. Childhood2004; 11: 81—93.
9.
Alderson P.Children as researchers: the effects of participation rights on research methodology . In: Christensen P, James A, eds. Research into children: perspectives and practices. London: Falmer, 2000: 241—57.
10.
Christensen P., Prout A.Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood2002; 9: 477—97.
11.
Field MJ, Behrman REEthical conduct of clinical research involving children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.
12.
Beardsmore CSEthical aspects of respiratory research in infancy and early childhood. Pediatr Pulmonol1998 ; 26: 64—8.
13.
Morrow V., Richards M.The ethics of social research with children: an overview. Children Soc1996; 10: 90—105.
14.
The World Medical Association Policy. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed August 2006).
15.
Goodenough T. , Williamson E., Kent E., Ashcroft R.What did you think about that? Researching children's perceptions of participation in a longitudinal genetic epidemiology study. Children Soc2003; 17: 113—25.
16.
British Psychological Society.Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants. Available at: http://www.bps.org.uk/the-society/ethicsrules-charter-code-of-conduct/code-of-conduct/ethical-principles-for-conducting-research-with-human-participants.cfm (accessed August 2006).
17.
British Sociological Association.Statement of ethical practice for the British Sociological Association. Available at: [http://www.britsoc.co.uk/new_site/user_doc/Statement%20of%20Ethical%20Practice.pdf (accessed August 2006).
18.
American Sociological Association.Code of ethics and policies and procedures of the ASA Committee on professional ethics. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1999.
19.
Greig A., Taylor J.Doing research with children. London: Sage, 1999.
20.
James A., Jenks C., Prout A.Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
21.
Harden J., Scott S., Backett-Milburn K., Jackson S.Can't talk, won't talk? Methodological issues in researching children. Sociol Res Online2000; 5.
22.
Christensen P. , James A.Research with children: perspectives and practices . London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2000.
23.
Mayall B.Children's childhoods: observed and experienced. London : Falmer Press, 1994.
24.
Brannen J., Dodd K., Oakley A., Storey P.Young people, health and family life. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1994.
25.
Prout A., James A.Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer, 1997.
26.
Hatch J.Impression management in kindergarten classrooms: an analysis of children's face to face work in peer interactions. Anthropol Educ Q1987; 18: 100—15.
27.
Corsaro W.Transitions in early childhood: the promise of comparative, longitudinal ethnography . In: Colby A, Jessor R, Shweder R, eds. Ethnography and human development: context and meaning in social inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1996: 419—57.
28.
Bluebond-Langner M.The private worlds of dying children. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.
29.
Shaw I.Unbroken voices: children, young people and qualitative methods. In: Butler I, Shaw I, eds. A case of neglect? Children's experiences and the sociology of childhood. Aldershot: Avebury, 1996: 19—36.
30.
Mauthner M.Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: lessons from three research projects. Children Soc1997; 11: 16—28.
31.
Docherty S. , Sandelowski M.Interviewing children. Res Nurs Health1999; 22: 177—85.
32.
Fine G., Sandstrom K.Knowing children, participant observation with minors. London: Sage, 1988.
33.
Edwards J., Gibson F., Richardson A., Sepion Bre.Fatigue in adolescents with and following a cancer diagnosis: developing and evidence base for practice. Eur J Cancer2003 ; 39: 2671—80.
34.
Wallander JL , Varni JWEffects of pediatric chronic physical disorders on child and family adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry1998; 39: 29—46.
Noll Rbm, Garstein MA, Vannatta K., Corell J., Bukowski WM, Davies,WH. Social, emotional and behavioural functioning of children with cancer. Pediatrics1999; 103: 71—8.
37.
Bauman LJ, Drotar D., Leventhal JM, Perrin EC, Pless IBA review of psychosocial interventions for children with chronic health conditions . Pediatrics1997; 100: 244—51.
38.
Zebrack BJ, Chesler MAHealth-related worries, self-image and life outlooks of long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Health Soc Work2001; 26: 245—56.
39.
Zebrack B., Zelter L., Whitton J., et al. Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood leukaemia, Hodgkin's disease, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Pediatrics2002; 110: 42—52.
40.
Oosterhuis J., Coeburgh J., Van Veen E.Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients. Nat Rev Cancer2003; 3: 73—7.
41.
Stationery Office .The Royal Liverpool children's inquiry report . London: Stationery Office, 2001.
42.
Seale C., Kirk D., Tobin M., et al. Effect of media portrayals of removal of children's tissue on UK tumour bank. BMJ2005; 331: 401—3.
43.
MedicalResearch Council. Human tissue and biological samples for use in research-operational and ethical guidelines. London: MRC, 2001.
44.
Human Genetics Commission.Inside information. London: Human Genetics Commission, 2002.
45.
Titmuss R.The gift relationship: from human blood to social policy. London: Allen and Unwin, 1970.
46.
Tutton R.Person, property and gift: exploring languages of tissue donation to biomedical research. In: Tutton R, Corrigan O, eds. Donating and exploiting DNA . London: Routledge, 2004: 19—38.
47.
Lock M.The alienation of body tissue and the biopolitics of immortalized cell lines . Body Society2001; 7: 63—92.
48.
Tutton R.Gift relationships in genetics research. Sci Culture2002; 11: 523—42.
49.
Fox M., McHale J.Regulating human body parts and products. Health Care Analysis2000; 8: 83—6.
50.
Rabinow P. FrenchDNA: trouble in purgatory. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.
Waldby C.Biomedicine, tissue transfer and intercorporeality. Feminist Theory2002; 3: 239—54.
53.
Office of National Statistics.Childhood cancer . London: Office of National Statistics , 2004.
54.
Illman J.Cancer registries: should informed consent be required?J Natl Cancer Inst2002; 94: 1269—70.
55.
Jenkinson C. , Muir K., Hawtin P., Chilvers C.Attitudes and impressions of participants in a study of the causes of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer2001; 84: 413—16.
56.
Scott D., Valery P., Boyle F., Bain C.Does research into sensitive areas do harm? Experiences of research participation after a child's diagnosis with Ewing's sarcoma. Med J Aust2002; 177: 507—10.
57.
Bleyer W.The US Pediatric Cancer Clinical Trials Programmes: the international implications and the way forward. Eur J Cancer1997; 33: 1439—47.
58.
Ablett S., Pinkerton C.Recruiting children into cancer trials, role of the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG). Br J Cancer2003 ; 88: 1661—5.
59.
McTiernan A.Issues surrounding the participation of adolescents with cancer in clinical trials in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care2003; 12: 233—9.
Tallon D., Chard J., Dieppe P.Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer . Lancet2000; 355: 2037—40.
62.
Koops L., Lindley RIThrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: consumer involvement in design of new randomised controlled trial. BMJ2002; 325: 415.
63.
Levi RB, Marsick R., Drotar D., Kodish E.Diagnosis, disclosure, and informed consent: learning from parents of children with cancer. J Pediatr Haematol Oncol2000 ; 22: 3—12.
64.
Wiley F., Ruccione K., Moore I., et al. Parents' perceptions of randomization in pediatric clinical trials. Cancer Pract1999; 7: 248—56.
65.
Kodish E., Eder M., Noll R., et al. Communication of randomization in childhood cancer trials. JAMA2004; 291: 470—5.
66.
Simon C., Zyzanski SJ, Eder M., Raiz P., Kodish ED, Siminoff LAGroups potentially at risk for making poorly informed decisions about entry into clinical trials for childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol2003; 21: 2173—8.
67.
Kupst M., Patenaude A., Walco G., Sterling C.Clinical trials in pediatric cancer: parental perspectives on informed consent . J Pediatr Hematol Oncol2003; 25: 787—90.
68.
Brannen J., O'Brien M.Introduction. In: Brannen J, O'Brien M, eds. Children and families: research and policy. London: Falmer Press , 1996.
