Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine social comparison in illness using a mixed-methods approach that combined inductive exploration of how people used social comparison in this self-help group with a quantitative study of social comparison processes and their relationship to quality of life.
Methods: The qualitative study involved 15 semi-structured interviews with people with Ménière's disease. Themes from the analysis of the interviews informed the development of the Social Comparison in Illness Scale (SCIS), which was then validated in a questionnaire study, in which participants with Ménière's disease (n=196) completed the SCIS, the previously validated Identification/Contrast social comparison scale, and the SF-36 health status questionnaire.
Results: The qualitative study uncovered a wide range of forms of social comparison, including upward, downward and lateral comparison on illness and coping dimensions, as well as comparing solely for informational purposes. The quantitative study indicated that these varied directions and dimensions of social comparison could be mapped onto five reliable categories that were related to quality of life: upward positive and downward positive comparison, upward negative and downward negative comparison, and comparing for information.
Discussion: These analyses highlight the complexity of socially comparing in chronic illness, but also confirm the validity of the Identification/Contrast model of social comparison in this context.
Festinger L.A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Rela1954; 7: 117—40.
2.
Gibbons FXSocial comparison as a mediator of response shift. Soc Sci Med1999; 48: 1517—30.
3.
Gibbons FX, Buunk BPIndividual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol1999; 76: 129—42.
4.
Schachter S.The psychology of affiliation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959.
5.
Wood JV, Taylor SE, Lichtman RRSocial comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol1985; 49: 1169—83.
6.
Taylor SEAdjustment to threatening events. Am Psychol1983; 38 (11): 1161—73.
7.
Helgeson VSModerators of the relation between perceived control and adjustment to chronic illness. J Pers Soc Psychol1992 ; 63: 656—66.
8.
Bennenbroek Ftc, Buunk BP, van der Zee KI, Grol B.Social comparison and patient information: what do cancer patients want? Patient Educ Couns2002; 47: 5—12.
9.
Stiegelis HE , Hagedoorn M., Sanderman R., et al. The impact of an informational self-management intervention on the association between control and illness uncertainty before and psychological distress after radiotherapy . Psycho-oncology2004; 13: 248—59.
10.
Ybema JF, Buunk BPAffective responses to social comparison: a study among disabled individuals . Br J Soc Psychol1995; 34: 279—92.
11.
Wills TADownward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychol Bull1981; 90: 245—71.
12.
Buunk BP, Collins RL, Taylor SE, VanYperen NW, Dakof GAThe affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs. J Pers Soc Psychol1990; 59: 1238—49.
13.
Tennen H., McKee TE, Affleck G.Social comparison processes in health and illness. In: Suls J, Wheeler L, eds. Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, 2000: 443—83.
14.
Affleck G., Tennen H.Social comparison and coping with major medical problems. In: Suls J, Wills TA, eds. Social comparison: contemporary theory and research . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1991: 369—93.
15.
Wills TASimilarity and self-esteem in downward comparison. In: Suls J, Wills TA, eds. Social comparison: contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991: 51—78.
16.
Buunk BP, Ybema JFSocial comparison and occupational stress: the identification-contrast model . In: Buunk BP, Gibbons FX, eds. Health, coping and well-being . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1997 : 359—88.
17.
De Vellis RF , Holt K., Renner BR, Blalock SJ, Blanchard LW, Cook HLThe relationship of social comparison to rheumatoid arthritis symptoms and affect. Basic Appl Soc Psychol1990; 11: 1—18.
18.
Gibbons FX, Blanton H., Gerrard M., Buunk B., Eggleston T.Does social comparison make a difference? Optimism as a moderator of the relation between comparison level and academic performance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull2000; 26: 637—48.
19.
Heidrich SM, Ryff CDThe role of social comparisons processes in the psychological adaptation of elderly adults. J Gerontol1993; 48: 127—36.
20.
Blalock SJ, De Vellis BM, De Vellis RFSocial comparison among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. J Appl Soc Psychol1989; 19: 665—80.
21.
De Vellis RF , Blalock SJ, Holt K., Renner BR, Blanchard LW, Klotz MLArthritis patient's reactions to unavoidable social comparisons. Pers Soc Psychol Bull1991; 17: 392—9.
22.
Bogart LM, Helgeson VSSocial comparison among women with breast cancer: a longitudinal investigation . J Appl Soc Psychol2000; 30: 547—75.
23.
Van der Zee K., Buunk BP, Sanderman R., Botke G., Van den Bergh F.Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment . Pers Individ Diff2000; 28: 17—34.
24.
Saeed SRFortnightly review: diagnosis and treatment of Ménière's disease. BMJ1998; 316: 368—72.
25.
Hagnebo C., Melin L., Larsen HC, Lindberg P., Lyttkens L., Scott B.The influence of vertigo, hearing impairment and tinnitus on the daily life of Ménière's patients. Scand Audiol1997 ; 26: 69—76.
26.
Honrubia V. , Harris MR, Bell TS, Baloh RW, Fisher LMQuantitative evaluation of dizziness characteristics and impact on quality of life. Am J Otol1996 ; 17: 595—602.
27.
Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications , 1990.
28.
Joffe H., Yardley L.Interviews and focus groups: content and thematic analysis. In: Marks DF, Yardley L, eds. Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: Sage, 2003: 56—68.
29.
Jenkinson C., Wright L., Coulter A.Patient-assessed health measurement: an introduction. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, 1993.
30.
Ménière's Society. Available at: www.meniere's.co.uk (aceessed December 2005)
31.
Taylor SE, Lobel M.Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts . Psychol Rev1989; 96: 569—75.
32.
Wills TAModes and families of coping: an analysis of downward comparison in the structure of other cognitive and behavioural mechanisms. In: Buunk B, Gibbons FX, eds. Health, coping and well-being: perspectives from social comparison theory . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1997: 167—93.
33.
Dibb B., Yardley L.How does social comparison within a self-help group influence adjustment to chronic illness? A longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med2006; 63: 1602—12.
34.
Cohn MARescuing our heroes: positive perspectives on upward comparisons in relationships, education, and work. In: Linley PA, Joseph S, eds. Positive psychology in practice . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2004:218-36.
