BaggsR.PenneyD.P.CoxC.ChildS.Z.RaemanC.H.DaleckiD.CarstensenE.L.1996.Thresholds for ultrasonically induced lung haemorrhage in neonatal swine. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.22, 119–28.
4.
BrennanP.C.EttarhR.R.ArangoD.TonraM.StantonM.1999.Ultrasound-induced morphological change within murine small intesine. Poster presentation, Radiology99, May 1999, Birmingham.
5.
CampbellJ.D.ElfordR.W.BrantR. F.1993.Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. Can. Med. Assoc. J.149, 1435–40.
6.
DaleckiD.O'BrianW.D.1997.Ultrasonically-induced lung haemorrhage in young swine. UltrasoundMed. & Biol.23, 777–81.
7.
DaleckiD.RaemanC.H.ChildS.Z.CarstensenE.L.1995.Intestinal haemorrhage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.21, 1067–72.
8.
DaleckiD.RaemanC.H.ChildS.Z.CoxC.FrancisC.W.MeltzerR.S.CarstensenE.L.1997.Hemolys in vivo from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.23, 307–313.
9.
ECURS, 1994.Guidelines for the safe use of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) devices. European J. Ultrasound3, 315–6.
10.
FDA1997.Information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearence of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, HFZ-470, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850.
11.
HendersonJ.WillsonK.JagoJ. R.WhittinghamT. A.1995.A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound scanners in current clinical use. Ultrasound in Med & Biol21, 699–705.
12.
JagoJ.R.HendersonJ.WhittinghamT.A.MitchellG.1999.A comparison of AIUM/NEMA Thermal Indices with calculated temperature rises for a simple third trimester pregnancy tissue model. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.25: 623–628.
13.
MillerD.L.GiesR.A.1998.Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 MHz ultrasound on mouse intestine. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.24: 1201–1208.
14.
NewnhamJ.P.EvansS.F.MichaelC.A.StanleyF.J.LandauL. I.1993.Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 342, 887–91.
15.
SalversenK.A.VattenL.J.Eik-NesS.H.HugdahlK.BakketeigL.S.1993.Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. Br. Med. J.307, 159–64.
16.
ShawA.PayN.M.PrestonR.C.1998.Assessment of the likely thermal index values for pulsed Doppler ultrasonic equipment. Report NPL CMAM 12, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, U.K.
17.
SkybaD.M.PriceR.J.LinkaA.Z.1998.Microbubble destruction by ultrasound results in in capillary rupture: adverse bioeffects or a possible mechanism for in vivo drug delivery?J Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.11, 497.
18.
StarkC.R.OrleansM.HaverkampA.D.MurphyJ.1984.Short and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstet. Gynecol.63, 194–200.
19.
TaranatalA.F.CanfieldD.R.1994.Ultrasound-induced lung haemorrhage in the monkey. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.20, 65–72.
20.
TarantalA.F.GargoskyS.E.EllisD.S.O'BrianD.O.Jr.HendrickxA.G.1995.Haematological and growth-related effects of frequent prenatal ultrasound exposure in the long-tailed macaque. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.21, 1073–1081.
21.
WFUMB1998.Conclusions and Recommendations on Thermal and Non-thermal Mechanisms for Biological Effects. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.24, xv–xvi.
22.
DuckF AMartinK1991.Trends in diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Phys. Med. Biol.36, 1423–1432.
23.
WhittinghamT A1999.“Acoustic outputs of diagnostic machines”, in Safety of Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound. Eds. ter HaarGDuckF A.British Institute of Radiology, London.