WaldN JMurphyPMajorP: UKCCCR Multicentre Randomized Trial of One and Two View Mammography in breast cancer screening. BMJ1995; 311: 1189–93.
2.
StamperPCVan VoorhisBJRavnikarVA: Mammographic changes associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: a longitudinal study. Radiology1990; 174: 487–490.
3.
CyrlakDWongCH.Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy. AJR1993; 161: 1177–83.
4.
HickmanP.F.MooreN.R.ShepstoneB.J: The indeterminate breast mass: Assessment using Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. BJR1994; 67: 14–20.
5.
WeinrebJ.C.NewsteadG: MR Imaging of the Breast. Radiology1995; 196: 593–610.
6.
DaoT.H.RahmouniA.CampanaF: Tumour recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium enhanced MR imaging. Radiology1993; 187: 751–755.
7.
GillesRGuinebretiereJ.M.LucidarmeO: Non-palpable breast tumours; diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology1994; 191: 625–631.
8.
DixonA KWheelerT KLomasDJ: Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging for axillary symptoms following treatment of breast carcinoma? A randomized trial. Clinical Radiology1993; 48: 371–376.
9.
GillesR.GuinebretiereJ.M.ToussanitC.: Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology1994; 191: 633–638.
10.
FobbenE.S.RubinC.Z.KalisherL.: Breast MR Imaging with commercially available techniques; radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology1995; 196: 143–152.
11.
NelsonT.R.PretoriusD.H.SchifferL.M.: Menstrual variation of normal breast NMR relaxation parameters. J. Comput Asssist Tomogr.1985; 9: 874–879.
12.
KaiserW.A.HahnD: Comparison of relative signal changes in breast lesions between 2D and 3D dynamic MR mammography at 1.5 T (abstr). Radiology1993; 189: 105.
13.
OellingerH.J.BuettnerA.F.Heywang-KoebrunnerS.H.: How realistic is a dedicated system for MR imaging of the female breast. Radiology1993; 189: 106.
14.
StamperP.C.HermanS.KlippensteinD.L.: Suspect breast lesions; findings at dynamic Gadolinium — enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic featuresRadiology1995; 197: 387–395.
15.
StackJ PRedmondO MCoddMB: Breast Disease: Tissue characterisation with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology1990; 174: 491–494.
16.
KerslakeR.W.CarletonP.J.FoxJ.N.: Dynamic gradient echo and fat suppressed spin echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Clinical Radiology1995; 440–454.
17.
TurkatT.J.KleinB.D.PolanR.L.: Dynamic MR mammography: A technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. JMRI1994; 4: 563–568.
18.
OrelS.G.ScnallM.D.LiVolsiV.A: Suspicious Breast Lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology1994; 190: 485–493.
19.
HarmsS.E.FlamigD.P: MR imaging of the breast. JMRI1993; 3: 277–283.
20.
WaldD.S.WeinrebJ.C.NewsteadG: MR guided fine needle aspiration of breast lesions: Initial experienceJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography1996; 20 (1): 1–8.
21.
Heywang-KobrunnerS.H.HuynhA.T.ViehwegP: Prototype breast coil for MR -guided needle localization. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography1994; 18 (6): 876–881.
22.
AdlerD.D.WahlR.L: New methods for imaging the breast: Techniques, findings and potential. AJR1995; 164: 19–30.
23.
HarmsS. E.FlamigD.PEvansW.P.: MR imaging of the breast: Current status and future potential. AJR1994; 163: 1039–1047.
24.
GorczycaD.P.DeBruhlN.D.MundD.F.: Linguine sign at MR imaging: does it represent the collapsed silicone implant shell?Radiology1994; 191: 576–577.
25.
BergW.A.CaskeyC.I.HamperU.M.: Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, ultrasound and mammography. Radiographics1993; 13: 1323–1326.
26.
MundD.F.FarriaD.M.GorczycaD.P.: MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone gel implants: spectrum of findings. AJR1993; 161: 773–778.
27.
GorczycaD.P.SinhaS.AhnC.Y.: Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology1992; 185: 407–410.
28.
BuscombeJ: Scintigraphic imaging of breast cancer: A review. Nuclear Medicine Communications1997; 18: 698–709.
29.
VeronesiUPaganelliGGalimbertiV: Sentinel Node Biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes. The Lancet1997; 349: 1864–67.
30.
BruntonJ NCaramellaEHeryM: Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: pre operative detection with ultrasound. Radiology1986; 158: 325–6.
31.
MumtazHHall-CraggsM ADavidsonT: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR1997; 169: 417–24.
32.
ALMANAC MRC trial protocol; A randomized trial of sentinel node guided axillary therapy compared with standard axillary therapy in early breast cancer. Final version June 1999.
33.
Scintimammography.A guide to good practice.BuscombeJohn, HillJonathan, ParbhooSantilal.1998Gibbs Associates Limited.