ConnorJMFerguson-SmithMA.Chromosomal disorders. in Essential Medical Genetics. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.1991:pp 131–146.
2.
CuckleHSWaldThompsonS.Estimating a womans risk of having a pregnancy with Downs syndrome, using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. Br J Obstet Gyaecol1987; 94: 387–402.
3.
CuckleHNauchahalKWaldN.Birth prevalence of Downs syndrome in England and Wales. Prenat Diagn1991; 11: 29–34.
4.
MerkatzJRNitowskyHMMacriJNJohnsonWE.An association between low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosome abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol1984; 148: 886–894.
5.
CuckleHSWaldNJ.Screening for Down syndrome. In LilfordRJ (Ed) Prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Butterworths, London1990:pp 67–92.
6.
CuckleHSWaldNJ.The effect of estimating gestational age by ultrasound cephalometry on the sensitivity of alpha-fetoprotein screening for Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1987; 94: 274–276.
7.
CanickJAKnightGJPalomakiGEHaddowJECuckleHSWaldNJ.Low second trimester maternal serum unconjugated oestriol in pregnancies with Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1988; 95: 330–333.
8.
Norgaard-PedersonBLarsenSOArendsJSvenstrupBTaborA.Maternal serum markers in screening for Down's syndrome. Clin Genet1990; 37: 35–43.
9.
WaldNJCuckleHS.AFP and age screening for Down's syndrome. Proceedings of the American society of Human Genetics Conference, October 1987. Am J Hum Genet1988; 31: 197–209
10.
MantinghAMarrinkJde WolfBBreedASPMBeekhuisJRVisserGHA.Low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein at 10 weeks' gestation and fetal Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1989; 96: 499–500.
11.
CuckleHSWaldNJBarkaiGFuhrmannWAltlandKBrambatiBKnightGPalomakiGHaddowJECanickJ.First trimester biochemical screening for Down syndrome. Lancet1988;ii: 851–852.
12.
NicolaidesKHSnijdersRMGosdenCMBerryCCampbellS.Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal defects. Lancet1992; 340: 704–707.
13.
PerryTBBenzieRJCassarNHamiltonEFStockerJToftager-LarsenKLippmanA.Fetal cephalometry by ultrasound as a screening procedure for the prenatal detection of Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1984; 91: 138–143.
14.
LockwoodCBenacerrafBKrinskyABlakemoreKBelangerKMahoneyMHobbinsJ.A sonographic screening method for Down's syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol1987; 157: 803–808.
15.
BrumfieldCGHauthJCCloudGADavisROHensonBVCosperP.Sonographic measurements and ratios in fetus with Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol1989; 73 (4):644–646.
16.
BenacerrafBRFrigolettoFDCramerDW.Down syndrome: Sonographic signs for diagnosis in the second trimester. Radiol1987; 163: 811–813.
17.
PlattLDMadearisALHorensteinJMDevoreGRBeallMWassmanR.Sonographic screening for Down's syndrome: Does it really work? The society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 8th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. 1988 abstract.
18.
LynchLBerkowitzGSChitkaraUWilkinsIAMehalekKEBerkowitzRL.Ultrasound detection of Down's syndrome: Is it really possible?Obstet Gynecol1989; 73: 267–270.
19.
PetersMTLockwoodCJMillerWA.The efficacy of fetal sonographic biometry in Down's syndrome screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol1989; 161: 297–300.
20.
NicolaidesKHAzarGByrneDMansurCMarksK.Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosmal defects in the first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ1992; 304: 867–869.
21.
PandyaPPSnijdersRJMJohnsonSJBrizotMNicolaidesKH.Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency at 10–14 weeks gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1995; 102: 957–962.
22.
PandyaPPAltmanDBrizotMPettersenHNicolaidesKH.Repeatability of measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol1995; 5: 334–337.
23.
CuckleH.Fetal Nuchal Translucency test for Down's syndrome. Lancet1997; 350 (9091):1629–1630.
24.
GrudzinskasJGWardRHT, eds. Screening for Down syndrome in the first trimester. London.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists1997.
25.
PandyaPPBrizotMLKuhnPSnijdersRJMNicolaidesKH.First trimester fetal nuchal translucency thickness and risk for trisomies. Obstet Gynecol1994; 84: 420–423.
26.
PandyaPPKondyliosAHilbertLSnijdersRJMNicolaidesKH.Chromosomal defects and outcome in 1015 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol1995; 5: 15–19.
27.
JurkovicDJauniauxECampbellSPandyaPCardyDLNicolaidesKH.Coelocentesis: a new technique for early prenatal diagnosis. Lancet1993; 341 (8861):1623–1624.
28.
AdinolfiMSherlockJTutschekBHalderADelhantyJRodeckC.Detection of fetal cells in transcervical samples and prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat Diagn1995; 15 (10):943–949.
29.
LamvuGKullerJA.Prenatal diagnosis using fetal cells from the maternal circulation. Obstet Gynaecol Surv1997; 52 (7):433–437.
30.
The NICHD National Registry for Amniocentesis Study Group. Mid-trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis: Safety and accuracy. JAMA1976; 236 (13):1471–1476.
31.
Medical Research Council, Great Britain. An assesment of the hazards of amniocentesis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1978; 85:(suppl 2).
32.
TerzianEBorehamJCuckleHSWaldNJBobrowMLindenbaumTurnbullAC.A survey of diagnostic amniocenteses in Oxford from 1974 – 1981. Prenat Diag1985; 5: 401–414.
33.
TaborAPhilipJMasdenMBangJObelEBNorgaard-PetersonB.Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low risk women. Lancet1986;i: 1287–1293.
34.
BroomeDLWilsonMGWeissBKelloggPHN.Needle puncture of fetus: A complication of second trimester amniocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynaecol1976; 15: 247–252.
35.
MerinSBeythY.Uniocular congenital blindness as a complication of mid-trimester amniocentesis. Am J Opthal1980; 89: 299–301.
36.
ZipurskyAPollockJChownBIsraelsLG.Transplacental foetal haemorrhage after placental injury during delivery or amniocentesis. Lancet1963;ii: 493–494.
37.
HarrisonRCampbellSCraftI.Risks of fetomaternal haemorrhage resulting from amniocentesis with and without ultrasound placental localisation. Obstet Gynecol1975; 46 (4):389–391.
38.
SimpsonNEDallaireLMillerJRSiminovichLHamertonJLMillerJMcKeenC.Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease in Canada: Report of a collaborative study. Can Med Assoc J1976; 115: 739–746.
39.
LeschotNJVerjaalMTreffersPE.Risks of mid-trimester amniocentesis; an assessment in 3000 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1985; 92: 804–807.
40.
ByrneDLMarksKAzarGNicolaidesK.Randomized study of early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling: a technical and cytogenetic comparison of 650 patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1991; 1: 235–240.
41.
Canadian Collaborative CVS-Amniocentesis Clinical Trial Group, Multicentre randomized clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. Lancet1989;i: 1–6.
42.
Medical Research Council European Trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. Lancet1991; 8756: 1491–1499.
43.
Smidt-JensonSPerminMPhilipJ.Sampling success and risk by transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis: a randomized study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1991; 1: 86–90.
44.
FirthHVBoydPAChamberlainPMacKenzieIZLindenbaumRHHusonSM.Severe limb abnormalities after chorion villus sampling at 55–66 days' gestation. Lancet1991; 337: 762–763.
45.
FrosterUGBairdPA.Limb reduction defects in over one million consecutive livebirths. Teratology1989; 39: 127–135.
46.
MastroiacovoPCavalcantiDP.Limb-reduction defects and chorionic villus sampling. Lancet1991; 337: 1091.
47.
HsiehFChenDTsengLLeeCKoTChuangSChenH.Limb-reduction defects and chorion villus sampling. Lancet1991; 337: 1091–1092.
48.
MinyPHolzgreveWHorstJLenzW.Limb-reduction defects and chorion villus sampling. Lancet1991; 337: 1423–1424.
49.
NicolaidesKHSnijdersRJM.Cordocentesis. In EvansMl (Ed) Reproductive risks and prenatal diagnosis. Appleton and Lange, Conneticut, 1992; pp 201–220.
50.
BrambatiBTuluiLSimoniGTraviM.Genetic diagnosis before the eighth gestational week. Obstet Gynecol1991; 77 (2):318–321.
51.
NicolaidesKHSoothillPWRodeckCHWarrenRGosdenCM.Why confine chorionic villus (placental) biopsy to the first trimester?Lancet1986;i: 543–544.
52.
NicolaidesKHRodeckCHGosdenCM.Rapid Karyotyping in non-lethal malformations. Lancet1986;i: 283–287.
53.
GosdenCM.Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome anomalies. in LilfordRJ (Ed) Prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Butterworths, London1990:pp 104–164.
54.
ByrneDLAzarGNicolaidesK.Why cell culture is successful after early amniocentesis. Fet Diagn Ther1991; 6: 84–86.
55.
ByrneDL.Early amniocentesis. Fetal and Mat Med Review.1994; 6: 203–217
56.
ByrneDLMarksKBraudePRNicolaidesKH.Amnifiltration in the first trimester: feasibility, technical aspects and cytological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1991; 1: 320–324.
57.
ByrneDLPennaLMarksKOffley-ShoreB.First trimester amnifiltration: Technical, cytogenetic and pregnancy outcome of 104 consecutive procedures. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1995; 102 (3):220–223.
58.
Smidt-JensenSSundbergK.Early amniocentesis. Current Opinion Obstet Gynaecol1995; 7 (2):117–121.
59.
SundbergKJorgensenFSTaborABangJ.Experience with early amniocentesis. J Perinat Med1995; 23 (3):149–158.