MacMahonBPughT.Epidemiology. Principles and Methods. Boston: Little Brown, 1970.
2.
O'BrienW.Dose-dependent effect of ultrasound on fetal weight in mice. J Ultrasound Med1983; 2: 1–8.
3.
TarantalAHendrickxA.Evaluation of the Bioeffects of Prenatal Ultrasound Exposure in the Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fascicularis): I. Neonatal/Infant Observations. Teratology1989; 39: 137–147
4.
MooreRDiamondECavalieriR.The relationship of birth weight and intrauterine diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Obstet Gynecol1988; 71: 513–517.
5.
LyonsEDykeC.TomsMCheangM.In utreo exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: A 6-year follow-up. Radiology1988; 166: 687–690.
6.
NewnhamJEvansSMichaelCStanleyFLandauL.Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet1993; 342: 887–891.
7.
WaldenströmUAxelssonONilssonSEffects on routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet1988; 2: 585–588.
8.
BakketeigLEik-NesSJacobsenGRandomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet1984; 2: 207–211.
9.
Saari-KemppainenAKarjalainenOYlostaloPHeinonenO.Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. Lancet1990; 336: 387–391.
10.
EwigmanBCraneJFrigolettoFEffect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med1993; 329: 821–827.
11.
SalvesenKJacobsenGVattenLEik-NesSBakketeigL.Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent growth during childhood. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1993; 3: 6–10.
12.
NeilsonJ.Routine ultrasound in early pregnancy. Update Software1997 ed. Oxford: The Cochrane Library, 1997.
13.
CartwrightRMcKinneyPHoptonPUltrasound examination in pregnancy and childhood cancer. Lancet1984; 2: 999–1000.
14.
SorahanTLancashireRStewartAPeckI.Pregnancy ultrasound and childhood cancer: a second report from the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1995; 102: 831–832.
15.
WilsonLKWaterhouseJ.Obstetric ultrasound and childhood malignancies. Lancet1984; 2: 997–999.
ScheidtPStandleyFBrylaD.One-year follow-up of infants exposed to ultrasound in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol1978; 131: 743–748.
18.
StarkCOrleansMHaverkampAMurphyJ.Short and long term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstet Gynecol1984; 63: 194–200.
19.
SalvesenKBakketeigLEik-NesSUndheimJOklandO.Routine ultrasonography in utero and school performance at age 8–9 years. Lancet1992; 339: 85–89.
20.
SalvesenKVattenLJacobsenGRoutine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent vision and hearing at primary school age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1992; 2: 243–247.
21.
SalvesenKVattenLEik-NesSHugdahlKBakketeigL.Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. Br Med J1993; 307: 159–164.
22.
SalvesenKVattenLEik-NesSHugdahlKBakketeigL.Routine ultrasound scanning in pregnancy-Authors' reply. Br Med J1993; 307: 1562.
23.
GeschwindNGalaburdaA.Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, association and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Arch Neurol1985; 42: 427–459
24.
KielerHAxelssonOHaglundBNilssonSSalvesenK.Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent handedness. Early Hum Dev1997, in press.
25.
CampbellJElfordRBrantR.Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. Can Med Assoc J1993; 149: 1435–1440.
26.
SalvesenKVattenLBakketeigLEik-NesS.Routine ultrasonography in utero and speech development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1994; 4: 101–103.
