BraymanAAAzadnivMMakinIRSEffect of a stabilised microbubble echo contrast agent on hemolysis of human erythrocytes exposed to high intensity pulsed ultrasound. Echocardiography1995; 12: 13–21.
2.
BraymanAAAzadnivMCoxCMillerMW.Hemolysis of Albunex-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes in vitro by 1 MHz pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1996; 22: 927–938.
3.
BraymanAAMillerMW.Acoustic cavitation nuclei survive the apparent ultrasonic destruction of Albunex microspheres. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1997; 23: 793–796.
4.
DaleckiDRaemanCHChildSZCarstensenEL.Intestinal haemorrhage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1995a; 21: 1067–1072.
5.
DaleckiDRaemanCHChildSZCarstensenEL.Thresholds for intestinal haemorrhage in mice exposed to a piezo-electric lithotripter. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1995b; 21: 1239–1246.
6.
DaleckiDRaemanCHChildSZFrancisCWPenneyDPCarstensenEL.Contrast agents enhance biological effects in vivo. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.1996; 99: 2486.
7.
DaleckiDRaemanCHChildSZCoxCFrancisCWMeltzerRSCarstensenEL.Hemolysis in vivo from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1997; 23: 307–313.
8.
DuckFAStarrittHCAindowJDPerkinsMAHawkinsAJThe output of pulse echo ultrasound equipment: a survey of powers, pressures and intensities. Br. J. Radiol.1985; 58: 989–1001.
9.
ter HaarGR“Physical principles of Medical Ultrasound”. Ed. CR Hill.Ellis Horwood1986.
10.
HartmanCChildSZMayerRSchenkE, Carstensen ELLung damage from exposure to the fields of an electrohydraulic lithotripter. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1990; 16: 675–679.
11.
IveyJAGardnerEAFowlkesJBRubinJMCarsonPL.Acoustic generation of intra-arterial contrast boluses. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1995; 21: 757–767.
12.
MillerDLThomasRM.Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1995; 21: 1059–1065.
13.
MillerDLThomasRMContrast agent gas bodies enhance hemolysis induced by lithotripter shock waves and high intensity focused ultrasound in whole blood. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.1996; 22: 1089–1095.
14.
NandaNC: Echocontrast enhancers — how safe are they? In “Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement” Eds NandaNSchliefR1993: 97–110.
15.
RaemanCHChildSZDaleckiDMayerRParkerKJCarstensenEL.Damage to murine kidney and intestine from exposure to the fields of a piezoelectric lithotripter. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol1994; 20: 589–594.
16.
RaemanCHDaleckiDChildSZMeltzerRSCarstensenEL.Albunex does not increase the sensitivity of the lung to pulsed ultrasound. Echocardiography (in press).
17.
SchliefRStaksTMahlerMSuccessful opacification of the left heart chambers on echocardiographic examination after intravenous injection of a new saccharide based contrast agent. Echocardiology1990; 7: 1–4.
18.
UhlendorfVScholleF-D.Imaging of spatial distribution and flow of microbubbles using non-linear acoustic properties. Acoustical Imaging1996; 22: 233–238.