Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chervenak
F A
McCullogh
L B
(1996 ). Should sex identification be offered as part of the routine ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet . Gynaecol. , 8 , 293 –294 .
2.
Harrington
K
Armstrong
V
Freeman
J
Aquilina
J
Campbell
S
(1996 ). Fetal sexing by Ultrasound in the second trimester: maternal preference and professional ability . Ultrasound Obstet. Gynaecol. , 8 , 318 –321 .
3.
Meagher
S
Davison
G.
(1996 ). Early second trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound . Ultrasound Obstet. Gynaecol. , 8 , 322 –324 .
4.
Kenyon
S
Harrington
K
Armstrong
V
Brosnan
M
Freeman
J
Levey
U
Martin
J
Jordan
L
Campbell
S.
Fetal sexing by Ultrasound in the second trimester: matemal preference and professional ability . Proceedings BMUS 24th Annual Meeting, 9 – 11 December 1992, Blackpool .
5.
Oliver
S
Rajan
L
Turner
H
Oakley
A
Entwistle
V
Watt
I
Sheldon
T A
Rosser
J.
, BMJ
1996 ; 313 : 1251 –5 .
6.
Newburn
M
Gready
M.
, Commentary: Evidence based information for women is important . BMJ
1996 : 313 : 1253 –4 .
7.
Chamberlain
P
Boyd
P A
, Commentary: Evidence based practice and antenatal ultrasonography — the need for more studies . BMJ
1996 ; 313 : 1254 –5 .