de LaceyG.What is audit? Why should we be doing it?Hospital Update1992: 458–466.
4.
British Medical Ultrasound Society. Clinical applications of ultrasonic fetal measurements. British Institute of Radiology, 1990, London.
5.
Report of the RCOG Working Party on Routine Ultrasound Examination in Pregnancy. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists1984: 21–22.
6.
CookP.G.BirchallI.W.J.JeansW.D.Audit of quality in a Radiological Department - A pilot study. Clinical Radiology1991: 44; 345–349.
7.
DudleyN.J.PotterR.Quality assurance in obstetric ultrasound. British Journal of Radiology1993: 66; 865–870.
8.
CampbellS.SmithP.Routine screening for congenital abnormalities by ultrasound. In Prenatal Diagnosis. Proc 11th Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, ed by RodeckC. R.NicolaidesK. N.. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 1983: 325–330.
9.
RosendahlH.KivinenS.Antenatal detection of congenital malformations by routine ultrasonography. Obstetrics and Gynaecology1989: 73; 947–951.
10.
Saari-KemppainenA.KarjalainenO.YlostaloP.HeinonenO.P.Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality; controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. Lancet1990: 336; 387–391.
11.
LeviS.HyjaziY.SchaapsJ.P.DefoortP.CoulonR.BuekensP.Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound. The Belgian Multicentre Study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology1991: 1; 101–110.
12.
ChittyL.S.HuntG.H.MooreJ.LobbM.Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. British Medical Journal1991: 303; 1165–1169.
13.
LuckC.A.Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks; a four year study of 8849 deliveries. British Medical Journal1992: 304; 1474–1478.
14.
ShirleyI.M.BottomleyF.RobinsonV.P.Routine radiographer screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk population. British Journal of Radiology1992: 65; 564–569.
15.
BucherH.C.SchmidtJ.G.Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? MetaOanalysis of various outcome measures. British Medical Journal1993: 307; 13–17.
16.
EwingmanB.G.CraneJ.P.FrigolettoF.D.. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. New England Journal of Medicine1993: 329; 821–827.
17.
ChervenakF.A.MacCulloughL.B.ChervenakJ.L.Prenatal informed consent for sonogram; an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. American Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology1989: 161; 857–860.
18.
BrooksT.PittC.The Quality Question: A report on the first year of the Organisational Audit Project. London, King's Fund Centre, 1990.