Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Unlike the United Kingdom, policies in Australia prevent sonographers from exercising autonomy in their level of communication with pregnant patients in the event of adverse findings. The organisational structure makes the sonographer dependent on the sonologist because sonographers do not have the authority to provide the official report. The emotional labour on sonographers is increased as they struggle to provide patient-centred care, given the limits put on their communication during the ultrasound examination. The aim of this study was to explore Australian sonographers’ views on communicating adverse findings, including their level of autonomy in communicating with patients and how this influences their sense of professional identity.

Methods

Following a national survey, seven purposively selected participants, who were qualified to perform obstetric ultrasound examinations, completed follow-up interviews. The interviews were thematically analysed with iterative comparison to the survey results. Three case studies show sonographers differed in their ‘communicator type’ due to geographical location and workplace setting.

Results

The case studies illustrate a sonographer’s communication role, and level of autonomy is negotiated/renegotiated depending on the needs and expectations of each workplace. Their communication practices varied due to the sonologist (radiologist/obstetrician) policy on sonographer/patient communication, presence and support in the clinical setting. A strong professional identity and level of autonomy came from the construction of attributes that were built over time based on multiple factors, including previous experience, geographical location, critical incidents, training and supportive work environments.

Conclusion

The sonography profession demands autonomy and a strong professional identity free of hierarchical barriers within a collaborative model of care.

Keywords

Ultrasound adverse results independent practice information patient-centred care preliminary report

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Edwards

Chamunyonga

Clarke

The role of deliberate practice in development of essential sonography skills. Sonography 2018; 5: 76–81.

Johnson

Arezina

McGuinness

, et al. Breaking bad and difficult news in obstetric ultrasound and sonographer burnout: is training helpful? Ultrasound 2019; 27: 55–63.

Dipietro

JA.

Psychological and psychophysiological considerations regarding the maternal-fetal relationship.

Infant Child Develop 2010; 19: 27–38.

Jo Delaney

Patient-centred care as an approach to improving health care in Australia. Collegian 2018; 25: 119–123.

McKechnie

Pridham

Tluczek

Walking the “emotional tightrope” from pregnancy to parenthood: understanding parental motivation to manage health care and distress after a fetal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease.

J Fam Nurs 2016; 22: 74–107.

Luz

George

Spitz

, et al. Breaking bad news in prenatal medicine: a literature review. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2017; 35: 14–31.

Smith

McNeil

Mitchell

, et al. A study of macro-, meso- and micro-barriers and enablers affecting extended scopes of practice: the case of rural nurse practitioners in Australia. BMC Nursing 2019; 18: 14.

Ramsay

Fracchia

CA.

The role of the sonologist in a sonographer‐based practice. Australas Radiol 1999; 43: 20–26.

Thomas S, O'Loughlin K and Clarke J. Sonographers' communication in obstetrics: Challenges to their professional role and practice in Australia. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2020; 23: 129--139.

10.

Australasian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. Minimum education & training requirements for ultrasound practitioners. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2017; 20: 132–135.

11.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Provision of medical ultrasound services, version 1.1 2019. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Faculty of Clinical Radiology Council.

12.

Benoit

Zadoroznyj

Hallgrimsdottir

, et al. Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: the evidence from Canada and Australia. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71: 475–481.

13.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Collaborative maternity care C-Obs 33, https://ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/RANZCOG-MEDIA/Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical-Obstetrics/Collaborative-Maternity-Care-(C-Obs-33)-Review-March-2016.pdf?ext=.pdf (2016, accessed 24 October 2019).

14.

Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand. Clinical practice guideline for care around stillbirth and neonatal death. 3rd ed. https://www.stillbirthcre.org.au/assets/Uploads/Respectful-and-Supportive-Perinatal-Bereavement-Care.pdf (2018, accessed 9 July 2019).

15.

Thomas

O’Loughlin

Clarke

Organisational and professional structures shaping the sonographer role in obstetrics. Sonography 2016; 3: 125–133.

16.

Department of Health. Medicare benefits schedule, http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Home (2016, accessed 3 February 2016).

17.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Standards of Practice for Clinical Radiology, Version 11.1. Sydney, Australia: ANZCR, 2020.

18.

Thomas

O’Loughlin

Clarke

The 21st century sonographer: role ambiguity in communicating an adverse outcome in obstetric ultrasound. Cogent Med 2017; 4: 1373903.

19.

Thomas

O’Loughlin

Clarke

Factors that influence the communication of adverse findings in obstetrics: a survey of current sonographer practices in Australia. J Diagnost Med Sonogr 2020; 36: 199–209.

20.

Dolbear

Harrison

Bolton

, et al. Consortium for the Accreditation of Sonographic Education (CASE) Standards for Sonographic Education, http://www.case-uk.org/standards/ (2019, accessed 8 April 2020).

21.

Society and College of Radiographers and British Medical Ultrasound Society. Guidelines for professional ultrasound practice. Revision 3, December 2018 Minor amendments, March 2019 (accessed 20 Feb 2020).

22.

British Medical Ultrasound Society. Sonographer workforce development, https://www.bmus.org/policies-statements-guidelines/sonographer-workforce-development/ (2018, accessed 3 March 2020).

23.

Hart

Dixon

A-M.

Sonographer role extension and career development: a review of the evidence. Ultrasound 2008; 16: 31–35.

24.

Brown

Engineering identities. Career Develop Int 2004; 9: 245–273.

25.

Gale-Grant

Gatter

Abel

Developing ideas of professionalism.

Clin Teacher 2013; 10: 165–169.

26.

Cruess

Boudreau

, et al. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators. Acad Med 2015; 90: 718–725.

27.

Elwyn

Edwards

Thompson

Shared decision making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

28.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Maternal suitability for models of care, and indications for referral within and between models of care, https://ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/RANZCOG-MEDIA/Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical-Obstetrics/Maternal-suitability-for-models-of-care-(C-Obs-30)-March-18.pdf?ext=.pdf (2016, accessed 20 January 2016).

29.

Weaver

Peters

Koch

, et al. ‘Part of the team’: professional identity and social exclusivity in medical students. Med Educ 2011; 45: 1220–1229.

30.

Hoogland

Jochemsen

Professional autonomy and the normative structure of medical practice. Theoret Med Bioethics 2000; 21: 457–475.

31.

Johnson

TJ.

Professions and power. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 1972.

32.

Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry. Sonographer Accreditation, https://www.asar.com.au/home (2019, accessed 10 February 2019).

33.

Riley

Kumar

Teaching medical professionalism.

Clin Med 2012; 12: 9–11.

34.

Manting

MA.

Interprofessional education and obstetric ultrasound. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 8: 72–76.

35.

Kasar

The meaning of professionalism. In: Clark

Kasar

(eds) Developing professional behaviors. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc., 2000, pp. 3–8.

36.

Simpson

Bor

‘I’m not picking up a heart-beat’: experiences of sonographers giving bad news to women during ultrasound scans. Br J Med Psychol 2001; 74: 255–272.

37.

Singh

Knight

Wright

, et al. Occupational burnout among radiographers, sonographers and radiologists in Australia and New Zealand: findings from a national survey. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016; 61: 304–310.

38.

Thomas

The need for interprofessional working. In: Thomas J, Pollard K and Sellman D (eds) Interprofessional working in health and social care: professional perspectives, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

39.

Miller

Interprofessional practice in health and social care: challenging the shared learning agenda. London: Arnold, 2001.

40.

Palmer

Short

Health care and public policy: an Australian analysis. 5th ed. South Yarra, Victoria: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

41.

Johnson

Cowin

Wilson

, et al. Professional identity and nursing: contemporary theoretical developments and future research challenges. Int Nurs Rev 2012; 59: 562–569.

42.

Finberg

HJ.

Whither (wither?) the ultrasound specialist?

J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 1543–1547.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.56 MB

Sonographers’ level of autonomy in communication in Australian obstetric settings: Does it affect their professional identity?

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material