Abstract
Background
Elastography is a new promising ultrasonographic technique which is used to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions based on the stiffness of the lesion.
Purpose
To determine the role of strain elastography in characterisation of breast lesions and to compare the diagnostic performances of strain elastography and conventional ultrasound (US).
Methods
In total, 113 breast lesions in 100 women were prospectively evaluated by US and strain elastography followed by the histopathological examination. Elastography score based on the Tsukuba colour scale and strain ratio were determined for each lesion. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for each modality and the diagnostic performances were compared. The best cut-off point was calculated for each of the elastography parameters using the receiver operator curve analysis.
Results
Out of the 113 lesions, 40 were malignant (35.4%) and 73 were benign (64.6%). The area under the curve for elastography score showed significant difference with that of US: 0.98 versus 0.90 (Difference = 0.08, p =0.02). The elastography parameters were more specific as compared to US (ES-95 and SR-93% vs. 63%, p < 0.05) with a high negative predictive value. The combined use of elastography and US gave better results with 95% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 94% accuracy and negative predictive value reaching 97%.
Conclusion
Strain elastography is a useful adjunct to conventional ultrasonography. The combined use of strain elastography and ultrasound improves the characterisation of breast lesions and helps in down-staging of assigned BI-RADS category, thereby avoiding unnecessary biopsies. ES is the most useful elastography parameter to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.