Risk of infection following semi-invasive ultrasound procedures in Scotland,2010 to 2016: A retrospective cohort study using linked national datasets

Abstract

Introduction

Outbreak reports indicate a risk of cross-infection following medical procedures using semi-invasive ultrasound probes. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of infection, using microbiological reports and antibiotic prescriptions as proxy measures, associated with semi-invasive ultrasound probe procedures, including transoesophageal echocardiography, transvaginal and transrectal ultrasound.

Methods

Patient records from the Electronic Communication of Surveillance in Scotland and the Prescribing Information System were linked with the Scottish Morbidity Records for cases in Scotland between 2010 and 2016. Three retrospective cohorts were created to include inpatients/day-cases and outpatients in the following specialties: Cardiology, Gynaecology and Urology. Cox regression was used to quantify the association between semi-invasive ultrasound probe procedures and the risk of positive microbiological reports and community antibiotic prescriptions in the 30-day period following the procedure.

Results

There was a greater hazard ratio of microbiological reports for patients who had undergone transoesophageal echocardiography (HR: 4.92; 95% CI: 3.17–7.63), transvaginal (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.21–1.64) and transrectal ultrasound (HR: 3.40; 95% CI: 2.90–3.99), compared with unexposed cohort members after adjustment for age, co-morbidities, previous hospital admissions and past care home residence. Similarly, there was a greater hazard ratio of antibiotic prescribing for those who had received transvaginal (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.20–1.32) and transrectal (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.66–1.84) ultrasound, compared with unexposed patients.

Conclusion

Analysis of linked national datasets demonstrated a greater risk of infection within 30 days of undergoing semi-invasive ultrasound probe procedures, using microbiological reports and antibiotic prescriptions as proxy measures of infection.

Keywords

Cross infection infection control ultrasound endosonography endocavitary probe echocardiography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Koibuchi

Kotani

Taniguchi

. Ultrasound probes as a possible vector of bacterial transmission. Med Ultrason 2013; 15: 41–44.

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Medical device alert: reusable transoesophageal echocardiography, transvaginal and transrectal ultrasound probes (transducers) (MDA/2012/037), https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/5485abf1ed915d4c0d000261/con160567.pdf (2012, accessed 2 January 2018).

Bancroft

English

Terashita

et al.

Outbreak of Escherichia coli infections associated with a contaminated transesophageal echocardiography probe. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34: 1121–1123.

Suleyman

Tibbetts

Perri

et al.

Nosocomial outbreak of a novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase Salmonella enterica serotype Isangi among surgical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37: 954–961.

Seki

Machida

Yamagishi

et al.

Nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa caused by damaged transesophageal echocardiogram probe used in cardiovascular surgical operations. J Infect Chemother 2013; 19: 677–681.

Kanemitsu

Endo

Oda

et al.

An increased incidence of Enterobacter cloacae in a cardiovascular ward. J Hosp Infect 2007; 66: 130–134.

Levy

Teysseire

Etienne

et al.

A nosocomial outbreak of Legionella pneumophila caused by contaminated transesophageal echocardiography probes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24: 619–622.

Vetter

Schuepfer

Kuster

et al.

A hospital-wide outbreak of Serratia marcescens and Ishikawa’s “fishbone” analysis to support outbreak control. Qual Manag Health Care 2016; 25: 1–7.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines.pdf (2008, accessed 2 January 2018).

10.

Health Protection Scotland. NHSScotland Guidance for Decontamination of Semi-Critical Ultrasound Probes; Semi-Invasive and Non-Invasive Ultrasound Probes, www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/resourcedocument.aspx?id=5729 (2017, accessed 2 January 2018).

11.

Health Facilities Scotland. Report on the 2012 national survey of the decontamination of transoesophageal echocardiography, transvaginal and transrectal ultrasound probes. Unpublished Report, 2015.

12.

Nyhsen

Humphreys

Nicolau

et al.

Infection prevention and ultrasound probe decontamination practices in Europe: a survey of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2016; 7: 841–847.

13.

Information Services Division Scotland. The National Data Catalogue, www.ndc.scot.nhs.uk/ (accessed 2 January 2018).

14.

Health Protection Scotland. ECOSS (The Electronic Communication of Surveillance in Scotland), www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/surveillance/SystemsDetail.aspx?id=248 (accessed 2 January 2018).

15.

Alvarez-Madrazo

McTaggart

Nangle

et al.

Data resource profile: the Scottish national Prescribing Information System (PIS). Int J Epidemiol 2016; 45: 714–715f.

16.

Information Services Division Scotland. Data Dictionary A-Z: CHI Number, www.ndc.scot.nhs.uk/Dictionary-A-Z/Definitions/index.asp?ID=128&Title=CHI%20Number (accessed 2 January 2018).

17.

Charlson

Pompei

Ales

et al.

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–383.

18.

Quan

Sundararajan

Halfon

et al.

Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43: 1130–1139.

19.

MedicinesComplete. British National Formulary (BNF) Legacy, www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/bnflegacy/64/ (accessed 2 January 2018).

20.

Bennie

Malcolm

Marwick

et al.

Building a national Infection Intelligence Platform to improve antimicrobial stewardship and drive better patient outcomes: the Scottish experience. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72: 2938–2942.

21.

Heymann

. Control of communicable diseases manual, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.

22.

Therneau T. A Package for Survival Analysis in S. version 2.38, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html (2015, accessed 2 January 2018).

23.

Kuwata

Takahashi

Koibuchi

et al.

Incidence of human papillomavirus contamination of transvaginal probes in Japan and possible contamination prevention strategy. J Med Ultrasonics 2016; 43: 505–508.

24.

Buescher

Möllers

Falkenberg

et al.

Disinfection of transvaginal ultrasound probes in a clinical setting: comparative performance of automated and manual reprocessing methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 646–651.

25.

Ngu

McNally

Patel

et al.

Reducing transmission risk through high-level disinfection of transvaginal ultrasound transducer handles. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 36: 581–584.

26.

M’Zali

Bounizra

Leroy

et al.

Persistence of microbial contamination on transvaginal ultrasound probes despite low-level disinfection procedure. PLoS One 2014; 9: e93368–e93368.

27.

Casalegno

Carval

KLB

Eibach

et al.

High risk HPV contamination of endocavity vaginal ultrasound probes: an underestimated route of nosocomial infection?

PLoS One 2012; 7: e48137–e48137.

28.

Bénet

Ritter

Vanhems

. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection related to endocavitary ultrasound probe expsoure in France. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35: 1429–1431.

29.

Kramer

Schwebke

Kampf

. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6: 130–130.

30.

Leroy

M’Zali

Kann

et al.

Impact of vaginal-rectal ultrasound examinations with covered and low-level disinfected transducers on infectious transmissions in France. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35: 1497–1504.

31.

Leroy

. Infectious risk of endovaginal and transrectal ultrasonography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 2013; 83: 99–106.

32.

Bénet

Vanhems

. Methodological issues concerning the meta-analysis by Leroy on the risk of infectious complications after endovaginal and transrectal ultrasonography. J Hosp Infect 2014; 88: 52–53.

33.

Bénet

Ecochard

Vanhems

. Letter to the editor regarding “Impact of vaginal-rectal ultrasound examinations with covered and low-level disinfected transducers on infectious transmissions in France” by Leroy et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 36: 851–852.

34.

Heidenreich

Bastian

Bellmunt

et al.

EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis and local treatment with curative intent – update 2013. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 124–137.

35.

Wolf

Bennett

Dmochowski

et al.

Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 2008; 179: 1379–1390.

36.

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Guidelines for Cleaning and Preparing External- and Internal-Use Ultrasound Probes Between Patients, Safe Handling, and Use of Ultrasound Coupling Gel, www.aium.org/officialStatements/57 (2017, accessed 13 February 2018).

37.

Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine, Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Guidelines for Reprocessing Ultrasound Transducers. AJUM 2017; 20: 30–40.

38.

Kanagala

Bradley

Hoffman

et al.

Guidelines for transoesophageal echocardiographic probe cleaning and disinfection from the British Society of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: i17–i23.

39.

Abramowicz

Evans

Fowlkes

et al.

Guidelines for cleaning transvaginal ultrasound transducers between patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43: 1076–1079.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.69 MB