Sonographic parameters for diagnosing fetal head engagement during labour

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of the head–perineum distance, angle of progression, and the head–symphysis distance as intrapartum ultrasound parameters in the determination of an engaged fetal head. Two hundred and one women in labour underwent both ultrasound and digital vaginal examination in the estimation of fetal head station. The transperineal ultrasound measured head–perineum distance, angle of progression, and head–symphysis distance for values correlating with digital vaginal examination head station. Using station 0 as the minimum level of head engagement, correlating cut-off values for head–perineum distance, angle of progression, and head–symphysis distance were obtained. Receiver operating characteristics were used in determining the diagnostic performance of these cut-off values for the detection of fetal head engagement. With head–perineum distance of 3.6 cm the sensitivity and specificity of sonographic determination of engaged fetal head were 78.7 and 72.3%, respectively. A head–symphysis distance of 2.8 cm also had sensitivity and specificity of 74.5 and 70.8%, respectively, in determining engagement, whilst an angle of progression of 101° was consistent with engagement by digital vaginal examination with 68.1% sensitivity and 68.2% specificity. Ultrasound shows high diagnostic performance in determining engaged fetal head at a head–perineum distance of ≤3.6 cm, head–symphysis distance of ≤2.8 cm, and angle of progression of ≥ 101°.

Keywords

Angle of progression head–perineum distance head–symphysis distance engaged fetal head

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Murphy

Shah

Cohen

. Labor and delivery in nulliparous women who present with an unengaged fetal head. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 122–125.

Friedman

Sachtleben

. Station of the fetal presenting part: III. Interrelationship with cervical dilatation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 93: 537–542.

Segel

Carreño

Weiner

et al.

Relationship between fetal station and successful vaginal delivery in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 723–730.

Debby

Rotmensch

Girtler

et al.

Clinical significance of the floating fetal head in nulliparous women in labor. J Reprod Med 2003; 48: 37–40.

Hamilton

Simoneau

Ciampi

et al.

Descent of the fetal head (station) during the first stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 360-e1–360-e1.

Elisabeth KW and Ira MB. Operative vaginal delivery. Up to date (guideline). Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer, 2006.

Sekia

Takedab

. A review of prerequisites for vacuum extraction: appropriate position of the fetal head for vacuum extraction from a forceps delivery perspective. Med Clin Rev 2016; 2. DOI: 10.21767/2471-299X.1000022.

Dixon

Foureur

. The vaginal examination during labour. Is it of benefit or harm? NZ Coll Midwives J 2010; 42: 21–26.

Lewin

Fearon

Hemmings

et al.

Women’s experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. Midwifery 2005; 21: 267–277.

10.

Maharaj

. Puerperal pyrexia: a review. Part I. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62: 393–399.

11.

Buchmann

Libhaber

. Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 101: 285–289.

12.

Wiafe

Whitehead

Venables

et al.

The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound 2016; 24: 222–232.

13.

Cunningham

Leveno

Bloom

et al.

Williams obstetrics, 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005, pp. 409–441.

14.

Barbera

Pombar

Perugino

et al.

A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 313–319.

15.

Youssef

Maroni

Ragusa

et al.

Fetal head–symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 419–424.

16.

Eggebø

Gjessing

Heien

et al.

Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 387–391.

17.

Maticot-Baptista

Ramanah

Collin

et al.

Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2009; 38: 474–480.

18.

Dimassi

Belghith

Triki

. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal head engagement. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2014; 127: 6–9.

19.

World Health Organization. Reproductive health. Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2003.

20.

Tutschek

Torkildsen

Eggebø

. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 425–429.

21.

Chan

Yung

et al.

Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head–perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1476–1481.

22.

Barbera

Imani

Becker

et al.

Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 320–325.