Sonographic imaging of extra-testicular focal lesions: comparison of grey-scale,colour Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Abstract

Extra-testicular lesions are usually benign but present with nonspecific grey-scale sonography findings. This study assesses conventional sonographic characteristics in the differentiation of extra-testicular tumoural from inflammatory lesions and whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a role. A retrospective database analysis was performed. All patients were examined by experienced sonographers employing standard techniques combining grey-scale, colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Features recorded were: clinical symptoms, size, location, echogenicity, colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement. Vascularity on colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound was graded and compared. The lesions were classified as tumoural or inflammatory. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the sonographic patterns and kappa coefficient to measure the agreement between colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A total of 30 lesions were reviewed (median diameter 12 mm, range 5–80 mm, median age 52 years, range 18–86 years), including 13/30 tumoural and 17/30 inflammatory lesions. Lesions were hypoechoic (n = 12), isoechoic (n = 6), hyperechoic (n = 2) or mixed (n = 10). Grey-scale characteristics of tumoural vs. inflammatory lesions differed significantly (P = 0.026). On colour Doppler sonography, lesions had no vessels (n = 16), 2–3 vessels (n = 10) and ≥4 vessels (n = 4). On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, lesions showed no vascularity (n = 17), perfusion similar to testis (n = 7) and higher (n = 6). All abscesses identified (n = 9) showed no vascularity on both colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. There was good agreement between these techniques in evaluating vascularity (κ = 0.719) and no significant difference between colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of tumoural vs. inflammatory lesions (P > 0.05). The grey-scale appearances of extra-testicular lesions are essential for characterisation. Colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings are not useful in that respect. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is excellent in establishing absence of vascularity.

Keywords

Epididymis tumour inflammation ultrasound contrast

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Woodward

Schwab

Sesterhenn

. Extratesticular scrotal masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2003; 23: 215–240.

Montogomery

Bloom

. The diagnosis and management of scrotal masses. Med Clin North Am 2011; 95: 235–244.

Beccia

Krane

Olsson

. Clinical management of non-testicular intrascrotal tumors. J Urol 1976; 116: 476–479.

Mirochnik

Bhargava

Dighe

. Ultrasound evaluation of scrotal pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50: 317–332.

Frates

Benson

DiSalvo

. Solid extratesticular masses evaluated with sonography: pathologic correlation. Radiology 1997; 204: 43–46.

Akbar

Sayyed

Jafri

SZH

. Multimodality imaging of paratesticular neoplasms and their rare mimics. Radiographics 2003; 23: 1461–1476.

Wolfman

Marko

Gould

. Mesenchymal extratesticular tumors and tumorlike conditions: from the radiologic pathology archives. Radiographics 2015; 35: 1943–1954.

Dell'atti

. Ultrasound diagnosis of unusual extratesticular mass: case report and review of the literature. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2013; 85: 41–43.

Dogra

Gottlieb

Oka

. Sonography of the scrotum. Radiology 2003; 227: 18–36.

10.

Merhej

Kanso

Tomb

. Paratesticular fibrous pseudotumors. Prog Urol 2005; 15: 739–741.

11.

Kim

Rosen

Langer

. US MR imaging correlation in pathologic conditions of the scrotum. Radiographics 2007; 27: 1239–1253.

12.

Cassidy

Ishioka

McMahon

. MR imaging of scrotal tumors and pseudotumors. Radiographics 2010; 30: 665–683.

13.

Claudon

Dietrich

Choi

. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 11–29.

14.

Piscaglia

Nolsoe

Dietrich

. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012; 32: 33–59.

15.

Huang

Sidhu

. Focal testicular lesions: colour Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tissue elastography as adjuvants to the diagnosis. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: S41–S53.

16.

Jaffer

Sidhu

. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the testes. Ultrasound Clin North Am 2013; 8: 509–523.

17.

Lock

Schmidt

Helmich

. Early experience with contrast enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of testicular masses; a feasibility study. Urology 2011; 77: 1049–1053.

18.

Isidori

Pozza

Gianfrilli

. Differential diagnosis of nonpalpable testicular lesions: qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced US of benign and malignant testicular tumors. Radiology 2014; 273: 606–618.

19.

Patel

Sellars

Clarke

. Features of testicular epidermoid cysts on contrast enhanced ultrasound and real time elastography. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1115–1122.

20.

Patel

Huang

Sidhu

. Metachronous bilateral segmental testicular infarction: multi-parametric ultrasound imaging with grey-scale ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and real-time tissue elastography (RTE). J Ultrasound 2014; 17: 233–238.

21.

Yusuf

Konstantatou

Sellars

. Multiparametric sonography of testicular hematomas. Features on grayscale, color Doppler, and contrast-enhanced sonography and strain elastography. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 1319–1328.

22.

Bertolotto

Derchi

Secil

. Grayscale and color Doppler features of testicular lymphoma. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 1139–1145.

23.

Hedayati

Sellars

Sharma

. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in testicular trauma: role in directing exploration, debridement and organ salvage. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: e65–e68.

24.

Lung

Jaffer

Sellars

. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of focal testicular complications secondary to epididymitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: W345–W354.

25.

Bertolotto

Derchi

Sidhu

. Acute segmental testicular infarction at contrast-enhanced ultrasound: early features and changes during follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 834–841.

26.

Carroll

Gross

. High frequency scrotal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140: 511–515.

27.

Benson

Doubilet

Richie

. Sonography of the male genital tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 705–713.

28.

Rifkin

Kurtz

Pasto

. Diagnostic capabilities of high resolution scrotal ultrasonography: prospective evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 13–19.

29.

Serra

Hriack

Coakley

. Inconclusive clinical and ultrasound evaluation of the scrotum: impact of magnetic resonance imaging on patient management and cost. Urology 1998; 51: 1018–1021.

30.

Cramer

Schlegel

Thueroff

. MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of scrotal and testicular disease. Radiographics 1991; 11: 9–21.

31.

Yang

Kim

. Differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions with gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 135–142.