Using ultrasound to teach anatomy in the undergraduate medical curriculum: an evaluation of the experiences of tutors and medical students

Abstract

This paper describes the experiences of staff and students at two UK medical schools, who introduced portable ultrasound (PU) as an imaging technology to deliver clinical anatomy teaching and to aid skill development in interpretation of cross-sectional anatomy (CSA). A sonographer contributed to curriculum design and teaching, but mostly anatomy tutors delivered the teaching. This case study method evaluates staff and student perspectives on the ultrasound-based anatomy teaching. Quantitative data and qualitative data were collected and analysed. Staff were positive about the experience. They described their expectations for students and solutions for practical issues regarding the teaching, but were concerned about their competency in scanning and wanted bespoke training for sonoanatomy teaching. Curriculum development was accelerated through engagement with a sonographer and an ultrasound champion. Students were extremely positive about their experience; they valued the expertise of a sonographer who taught more challenging sonoanatomy, but were equally positive regarding teaching sessions led by well-trained anatomy tutors who taught more simple sonoanatomy. Students affirmed most tutors’ expectations that ultrasound could reinforce existing anatomical knowledge, added clinical contextualisation, but not that use of ultrasound (US) assisted in interpreting CSA. Students valued the introduction to the technology and found sonoimage interpretation challenging, but not insurmountable. Students wanted more instruction on ultrasound physics, an expansion of ultrasound curriculum, with smaller groups and opportunities to scan volunteers. These data support the case for the use of PU to deliver anatomy teaching and to prime medical students for later clinical encounters with PU.

Keywords

Portable ultrasound undergraduate curriculum medical students anatomy sonoanatomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Patten

Donnelly

Richards

. Studying living anatomy: the use of portable ultrasound in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Int J Clin Skills 2010; 4: 72–7.

Ivanusic

Cowie

Barrington

. Undergraduate student perceptions of the use of ultrasonography in the study of “Living Anatomy”. Anat Sci Educ 2010; 3: 318–22.

Finn

Sawdon

Griksaitis

. The additive effect of teaching undergraduate cardiac anatomy using cadavers and ultrasound echocardiography. Eur J Anat 2012; 16: 199–205.

Griksaitis

Sawdon

Finn

. Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: A comparative study. Anat Sci Educ 2012; 5: 20–6.

Rao

van Holsbeeck

Musial

. A pilot study of comprehensive ultrasound education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 745–9.

Afonso

Amponda

Yang

. Adding new tools to the black bag – introduction of ultrasound into the physical diagnosis course. J Gen Int Med 2010; 25: 1248–52.

Hoppmann

Rao

Poston

. An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2011; 3: 1–12.

Fernandez-Frackelton

Peterson

Lewis

. A bedside ultrasound curriculum for medical students: prospective evaluation of skill acquisition. Teach Learn Med 2007; 19: 14–9.

Swamy

Searle

. Anatomy teaching with portable ultrasound to medical students. BMC Med Educ 2012; 12: 99–99.

10.

Stringer

Duncan

Samalia

. Using real-time ultrasound to teach living anatomy: an alternative model for large classes. N Z Med J 2012; 125: 37–45.

11.

Brown

Adhikari

Marx

. Introduction of ultrasound into gross anatomy curriculum: perceptions of medical students. J Emerg Med 2012; 43: 1098–102.

12.

Sweetman

Crawford

Hird

. The benefits and limitations of using ultrasound to supplement anatomical understanding. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6: 141–8.

13.

Pawson

Tilley

. Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage, 1997.

14.

Glaser

Strauss

. The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction, 2007.

15.

Lingard

Albert

Levison

. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 2008; 337: (39602):690162.47.–(39602):690162.47..

16.

Teichgräber

Meyer

Poulsen Nautrup

. Ultrasound anatomy: a practical teaching system in human gross anatomy. Med Educ 1996; 30: 296–8.

17.

Gogalniceanu

Sheena

Kashef

. Is basic emergency ultrasound training feasible as part of standard undergraduate medical education? J Surg Educ 2010; 67: 152–6.

18.

Butter

Grant

Egan

. Does ultrasound training boost Year 1 medical student competence and confidence when learning abdominal examination? Med Educ 2007; 41: 843–8.

19.

Wicke

Brugger

Firbas

. Teaching ultrasound of the abdomen and the pelvic organs in the medicine curriculum in Vienna. Med Educ 2003; 37: 476–476.

20.

Helio

Hansen

Holck

. Ultrasound ‘electronic vivisection' in the teaching of human anatomy for medical students. Eur J Ultrasound 1997; 5: 203–7.

21.

Teichgräber

Meyer

Berens von Rautenfeld

. Teaching applied anatomy to senior medical students with an emphasis on surgery and radiology. Surg Radiologic Anat 1996b; 18: 141–2.

22.

Arger

Schultz

Sehgal

. Teaching medical students diagnostic sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 1365–9.

23.

Shapiro

Jacobson

. A pilot project to study the use of ultrasonography for teaching physical examination to medical students. Comput Biol Med 2002; 32: 403–9.

24.

Wong

Jayatilleke

Kendall

. Feasibility of a focused ultrasound training programme for medical undergraduate students. Clinical Teacher 2011; 8: 3–7.

25.

Barloon

Brown

Abu-Yousef

. Teaching physical examination of the adult liver with use of real-time sonography. Acad Radiol 1998; 5: 101–3.

26.

Wittich

Montgomery

Neben

. Teaching cardiovascular anatomy to medical students by using a handheld ultrasound device. JAMA 2002; 288: 1062–3.

27.

Celebi

Zwirner

Lischner

. Student tutors are able to teach basic sonographic anatomy effectively – a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33(EFirst): 141–5.

28.

Knobe

Münker

Sellei

. Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ 2010; 44: 148–55.

29.

Pearson P, Scott L. From novel concept to valued collaboration: CETL4HealthNE final evaluation (full report). University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2013.