An investigation into sonography student experiences of simulation teaching and learning in the acquisition of clinical skills

Abstract

Technological developments are impacting on many aspects of life, including education. One particular area of technology where there is growing interest within higher education institutions (HEIs) offering healthcare training is the use of simulators. The literature shows diverging views on the role of simulated learning in healthcare and further evaluation is needed to explore the quality of learning opportunities that are offered, and their effectiveness in the preparation of students for clinical practice. A qualitative study was undertaken, using interviews to explore the experiences of a group of sonography students after interacting with an ultrasound simulator. Simulation was positively evaluated by students in this study. The findings confirm that simulated learning enables students to be interactive learners rather than being passive recipients of knowledge. Simulated learning provides learning opportunities in a risk free environment, which reduces stress for the student and potential harm to patients. Confidence levels were increased, thereby improving future clinical scanning experiences for both the student and their patients. Suggestions were made for the more effective integration of simulated learning into the curriculum. Continued research into simulation, teaching and learning practices needs to occur if we are to ensure maximum advantage of the simulation experience.

Keywords

Diagnostic ultrasound training ultrasound simulator sonography education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Higher Education Funding Council for England. Enhancing Learning and Teaching Through the Use of Technology. See http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2009/09_12/09_12.pdf (last checked 24 November 2013).

Department of Health. Liberating the NHS: Developing the Healthcare Workforce, from Design to Delivery, 2012. See http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_132076 (last checked 28 November 2013).

Gibbs V, Griffiths M. Funding and commissioning issues for undergraduate and postgraduate healthcare education. Imaging Oncol 2013;56–61.

Health Education England. Introducing Health Education England. See http://www.hee.nhs.uk/work-programmes/education-outcomes/ (last checked 2 November 2013).

White D, Warren N, Faughnan S, et al. Study of UK Online Learning: Final report. University of Oxford, 2010. See http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/UKOnlineLearningStudy-FinalReport-Mar10-FINAL-FORPUB.pdf (last checked 21 November 2013).

Gibbs

. An investigation into the challenges facing the future provision of continuing professional development for allied health professionals in a changing healthcare environment. Radiography 2011; 17: 152–7.

Educause. See http://www.educause.edu/home (last checked 2 Decmber 2013).

Bradley

. The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Med Educ 2006; 40: 254–62.

Johnson

Patterson

. Simulation education in emergency medical services for children. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med 2006; 7: 121–7.

10.

Linder

Pulsipher

. Implementation of simulated learning experiences for baccalaureate pediatric nursing students. Clin Simul Nurs 2008; 4: e41–7.

11.

Comer

. Patient care simulations: role playing to enhance clinical understanding. Nurs Educ Perspect 2005; 26: 357–61.

12.

Kinney

Henderson

. Comparison of low fidelity simulation learning strategy with traditional lecture. Clin Simul Nurs 2008; 4: e15–8.

13.

Jefferies

. A framework for designing, implementing and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect 2005; 26: 96–103.

14.

Alinier

Hunt

Gordon

. Determining the value of simulation in nurse education: study design and initial results. Nurse Educ Pract 2004; 4: 200–207.

15.

Weller

. Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Med Educ 2004; 38: 32–8.

16.

Harder

. Evolution of simulation use in health care education. Clin Simul Nurs 2009; 5: 169–72.

17.

Parr

Sweeney

. Use of human patient simulation in an undergraduate critical care course. Crit Care Nurs Q 2006; 29: 188–98.

18.

Moule

Wilford

Sales

. Student experiences and mentor views of the use of simulation for learning. Nurse Educ Today 2008; 28: 790–7.

19.

Schiavenato

. Reevaluating simulation in nursing education: beyond the human patient simulator. J Nurs Educ 2009; 48: 388–94.

20.

Black

Watties-Daniels

. Cutting edge technology to enhance nursing classroom instruction at Coppin State University. ABNF J 2006; 17: 103–6.

21.

Parker

Myrick

. A critical examination of high-fidelity human patient simulation within the context of nursing pedagogy. Nurs Educ Today 2009; 29: 322–9.

22.

Kneebone

Scott

Darzi

. Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1095–102.

23.

Brown

Chronister

. The effect of simulation learning on critical thinking and self confidence when incorporated into an electrocardiogram nursing course. Clin Simul Nurs 2009; 5: e45–52.

24.

Gomm

. Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

25.

Charmaz

. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative Analysis, London: Sage Publications, 2006.

26.

Strauss

Corbin

. Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.

27.

Heer

Middendorf

Muller-Egloff

. Ultrasound training: the virtual patient. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 440–44.

28.

Eraut

. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br J Educ Psychol 2000; 70: 113–36.

29.

Brannan

White

Bezanson

. Simulator effects on cognitive skills and confidence levels. J Nurs Educ 2008; 47: 495–500.

30.

Mikkelson

Reime

Harris

. Nursing students’ learning of managing cross infections – scenario-based simulation training versus study groups. Nurse Educ Today 2008; 28: 664–71.

31.

Gaba

. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual saf Health Care 2004; 13(Suppl 1): i2–10.

32.

Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive Summary. London: The Stationery Office (TSO), 2013. See http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/sites/default/files/report/Executive%20summary.pdf (last checked 14 December 2013).

33.

Kneebone

. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med 2005; 80: 549–53.

34.

Murray

Grant

Howarth

. The use of simulation as a teaching and learning approach to support practice learning. Nurse Educ Pract 2008; 8: 5–8.

35.

Prion

. A practical framework for evaluating the impact of clinical simulation experiences in prelicensure nursing education. Clin Simul Nurs 2008; 4: 69–78.