It is essential for the management of the patient that ultrasound practitioners produce reports based on their examinations that are accurate and clear. Ideally, all reports should attempt to answer the original clinical question. This seems a simple requirement and yet it is not always as easy as it sounds. In this paper, we explore the importance of the report, reasons that give rise to poor report writing and suggest educational resources that are available to improve poor report writing. Common mistakes and language ambiguity are discussed. Finally, we suggest a simple five-point framework, which practitioners may find useful when constructing ultrasound reports.
HallF. Language of the radiology report: primer for residents and wayward radiologists. AJR2000; 175: 1239–42.
2.
Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for the Reporting and Interpretation of Imaging Investigations, London: Royal College of Radiologists, 2006.
3.
European Society of Radiology. Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging2011; 2: 93–6.
CoakleyFLibermanLPanicekD. Style guidelines for radiology reporting: a manner of speaking. AJR2003; 180: 327–8.
15.
Royal College of Radiologists and the Society and College of Radiographers. Team Working in Clinical Imaging, London: Royal College of Radiologists and the Society and College of Radiographers, 2012.
