Increased public awareness about health care issues has led to an increase in litigation cases against health care professionals, At the same time sonographers are extending their role in medical ultrasound, leaving them more vulnerable to litigation procedures. This study looked at a wide range of issues relating to medico-legal risk amongst sonographers. As it was part of a much wider study only some of the Key issues are discussed in this article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PillingD (2000) Legal aspects of ultrasound: how to avoid being sued Reverberations, UKAS March 2000.
2.
PatersonA (1995) Role Development-Towards 2000; a survey of role development in radiography, College of Radiographers.
3.
FennPDiaconSGrayAHodgesRRickmanN (2000) Current cost of medical negligence in NHS hospitals: analysis of claims database, BMJ, 320: 1567–1571.
4.
CookG A (2000) Clinical incidents and risk management-a public health issue, J. Epidemiology & Community Health, 54 (4): 242–243.
5.
CameronAMastersonA (2002) Role Development; the drivers for change: Synergy, June 2002; 12–15.
6.
ChapmanA J (1993) The case (or radiographers performing Barium enemasBr. J. Hospital Medicine50 (7): 370–377.
7.
O'ReganS D (1997) Negotiating the Legal Minefield: Guidelines for Practising SonographiesThe Radiographer44 (2): 99–102.
8.
MeireH B (1996) Ultrasound-related litigation in obstetrics and gynaecology: the need for defensive scanningUltrasound Obstet Gynecology, 7 (4): 233–235.
9.
DoH (1995) The Patient's charter Patients Charter Unit NHS Executive HQ, Department of Health.
10.
FletcherD (1997) Hospital checks cancer test on 8000 women Electronic Telegraph. 14th Aug. 812.
11.
HallC (1997) Hospital admits liability for deaths in cancer error Electronic Telegraph. 24th Feb: 760.
12.
DoH (Press Release) (1997) Dobson orders overhaul of breast and cervical cancer screening programmes, Press release. DoH Publications.
13.
ChiamM (1997) Cervical smear scandal: women Deserve betterBr. J. of Nursing6 (20): 1153.
14.
ShirleyD (2001) Setting Standards for the Anomaly Scan, BMUS Bulletin, 9 (1): 8–11.
15.
SimanowitzA (1985) Standards, attitudes and accountability in the medical profession, Lancet2 (8454): 546–7.
16.
VincentCYoungMPhillipsA (1994) Why do people sue doctors ? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action, Lancet343 (8913): 1609–1613.
17.
WilsonJTingleJ (1999) Conclusions on the way Forward In: Clinical Risk Modification: A route to clinical governance187–195OxfordButterworth-Heinemann.
18.
SPSS, SPSS for Windows Release 8 0SPSS Inc, 1998Chicago ILL.
19.
HibbertK (1997) “Medico-legal issues affecting healthcare Professionals performing diagnostic medical ultrasound”, City University, London, Unpublished MSc Dissertation.
20.
SaxtonH M (1992) Should radiologists report every film?Clinical Radiology.45 (1) pp 1–3.
21.
RansomE (2002) The causes of musculoskeletal injury amongst sonographers in theUK: Society of Radiographers.
