This article presents findings from an action research study into how maternity-return coaching can complement organisational maternity benefits in order to facilitate career re-engagement. In an initial step, mothers and managers of two multinationals were interviewed. Based on the findings a coaching programme was developed, mothers were coached, provided feedback and the programme was refined. The research indicates that maternity-return coaching can complement organisational benefits by supporting mothers on an individual level. This can be achieved by developing strategies to use the organisations’ existing framework optimally, or by clarifying and communicating expectations. These findings could be relevant in other business sectors or similar return scenarios.
BaruchY. (2004). Transforming careers: from linear to multidirectional career paths, Career Development International, 9(1), pp. 58–73.
2.
BlaikieN. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research, Quality and Quantity, 25(2), pp. 115–136.
3.
BluckertP. (2006). Psychological dimensions of executive coaching. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
4.
BraunV. and ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101.
5.
BriscoeJ. P. & HallD. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: combinations and implications, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), pp. 4–18.
6.
BrownL. M. (2010). The relationship between motherhood and professional advancement: perception versus reality, Employee Relations, 32(5), pp. 470–494.
7.
BrownS. & KelanE. (2013). Managing maternity: maternity coaching, therapeutic culture and individualisation. Paper presented at the 13th annual conference of the British Academy of Management, University of Liverpool.
8.
BussellJ. (2008). Great expectations: can maternity coaching affect the retention of professional women?International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, Special Issue 2, pp. 14–26.
9.
CabreraE. (2009). Fixing the leaky pipeline: five ways to retain female talent, People and Strategy, 32(1), pp. 40–45.
10.
CahusacE. & KanjiS. (2014). Giving up: how gendered organizational cultures push mothers out, Gender, Work and Organization, 21(1), pp. 57–70.
11.
ClarkeM. (2011). Advancing women's careers through leadership development programs, Employee Relations, 33(5), pp. 498–515.
12.
ClarkeM. (2015). Dual careers: the new norm for Gen Y professionals?Career Development International, 20(6), pp. 562–582.
13.
ClarkeM. & PatricksonM. (2008). The new covenant of employability, Employee Relations, 30(2), pp. 121–141.
14.
CotterK. (2014). Research: maternity coaching, Association for Coaching: Global Bulletin, 3, pp. 20–21.
15.
CoxE., BachkirovaT. and ClutterbuckD. (2014). Theoretical traditions and coaching genres: mapping the territory, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), pp. 139–160.
16.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2015). Women on Boards: 5 Year Summary (Davies Review). London: DBIS.
17.
Ernst & Young. (2013). Ernst & Young's maternity coaching improves retention of talented women. London: E&Y.
FilsingerC. (2012). How can maternity coaching influence women's re-engagement with their career development: a case study of a maternity coaching programme in UK-based private law firms, International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, Special Issue 6, pp. 46–56.
20.
GatrellC. (2013). Maternal body work: how women managers and professionals negotiate pregnancy and new motherhood at work, Human Relations, 66(5), pp. 621–644.
21.
GuillaumeC. & PochicS. (2007). What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and the work-life balance, Gender, Work and Organization, 16(1), pp. 14–36.
22.
HewlettS.A. & Buck-LuceC. (2005). Off-ramps and on-ramps: keeping talented women on the road to success, Harvard Business Review, 83(3), pp. 43–54.
23.
KiddS. A. & KralM. J. (2005). Practicing participatory action research, Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), pp. 187–195.
LudemanK. (2009). Coaching with women. In: PassmoreJ. (ed.) Diversity in Coaching. London: Kogan Page, pp. 237–254.
28.
MainieroL. A. & SullivanS. E. (2005). Kaleidoscope careers: an alternate explanation for the "opt out" revolution, The Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), pp. 106–123.
29.
McKinsey. (2015). The power of parity: how advancing women's equality can add $12 trillion to global growth. McKinsey & Company.
30.
McNiffJ. (2014). Writing and Doing Action Research. London: Sage.
O'NeilD. A., HopkinsM. M. & BilimoriaD. (2008). Women's careers at the start of the 21st century: patterns and paradoxes, Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), pp. 727–743.
33.
RobersonQ. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations, Group & Organization Management, 31(2), pp. 212–236.
34.
RogersJ. (2012). Coaching Skills A Handbook. (3rd ed.) Maidenhead: Open University Press.
35.
SparrowS. (2009). Back to work without a bump, Personnel Today, p. 16.
36.
Stout-RostronS. (2013). Gender issues in business coaching. In: PassmoreJ., PetersonD. B. and FreireT. (eds.) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Coaching and Mentoring. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 155–174.
37.
Sue-ChanC. & LathamG. P. (2004). The relative effectiveness of external, peer and self-coaches, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(2), pp. 260–278.
38.
SullivanS. E. & MainieroL. A. (2007). Kaleidoscope careers: benchmarking ideas for fostering family-friendly workplaces, Organizational Dynamics, 36(1), pp. 45–62.
39.
SullivanS. E. & MainieroL. A. (2008). Using the kaleidoscope career model to understand the changing patterns of women's careers: designing HRD programs that attract and retain women, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(1), pp. 32–49.
